World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 63 3358 3070 292 272 254 17376

Timo Grimmer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Timo Grimmer between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Timo Grimmer published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 11.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2022. 14 of the 278 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2022. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 5 publications
2002 2025

278 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Timo Grimmer: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 0
2004 6
2005 5
2006 12
2007 3
2008 4
2009 6
2010 7
2011 7
2012 20
2013 9
2014 14
2015 18
2016 23
2017 22
2018 20
2019 18
2020 22
2021 11
2022 25
2023 10
2024 9
2025 5
Total 278
Download as CSV

Timo Grimmer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timo Grimmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 248–257 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 254 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174 254
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Timo Grimmer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timo Grimmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260 63
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Timo Grimmer is affiliated with the Technical University of Munich in Germany and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their work spans multiple subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The researcher's main areas of focus involve Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, dementia and cognitive impairment research, as well as neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms. Additional topics covered in their studies include functional brain connectivity, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, health systems with economic evaluations and quality of life considerations, and investigations into S100 proteins and annexins.

Timo Grimmer has published regularly in several scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease
  • European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease

Their recent papers reflect a focus on clinical trials and biomarker research related to Alzheimer's disease and include:

  • Two Phase 3 Trials of Gantenerumab in Early Alzheimer's Disease, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Crenezumab vs Placebo in Adults With Early Alzheimer Disease, 2022, JAMA Neurology
  • Safety and Efficacy of Semorinemab in Individuals With Prodromal to Mild Alzheimer Disease, 2022, JAMA Neurology
  • Anti-amyloid antibody therapies in Alzheimer's disease, 2023, Brain
  • Targeted Mass Spectrometry Suggests Beta-Synuclein as Synaptic Blood Marker in Alzheimer's Disease, 2020, Journal of Proteome Research

Frequent collaborators in Timo Grimmer's research include Janine Diehl-Schmid, Oliver Goldhardt, Marion Ortner, Igor Yakushev, and Robert Perneczky.

Best Publications

  • Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis.

    Willemijn J. Jansen;Rik Ossenkoppele;Dirk L. Knol;Betty M. Tijms

  • Mapping scores onto stages: mini-mental state examination and clinical dementia rating.

    Robert Perneczky;Stefan Wagenpfeil;Katja Komossa;Timo Grimmer

  • Prevalence of amyloid PET positivity in dementia syndromes: a meta-analysis.

    Rik Ossenkoppele;Willemijn J Jansen;Gil D Rabinovici;Dirk L Knol

  • Prediction of individual clinical outcome in MCI by means of genetic assessment and (18)F-FDG PET.

    Alexander Drzezga;Timo Grimmer;Matthias Riemenschneider;Nicola Lautenschlager

  • Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein in Serum is Increased in Alzheimer's Disease and Correlates with Cognitive Impairment.

    Patrick Oeckl;Steffen Halbgebauer;Sarah Anderl-Straub;Petra Steinacker

  • Beta Amyloid in Alzheimer's Disease: Increased Deposition in Brain Is Reflected in Reduced Concentration in Cerebrospinal Fluid

    Timo Grimmer;Matthias Riemenschneider;Hans Förstl;Gjermund Henriksen

  • Common variants in Alzheimer's disease and risk stratification by polygenic risk scores

    Itziar de Rojas;Itziar de Rojas;Sonia Moreno-Grau;Sonia Moreno-Grau;Niccolo Tesi;Benjamin Grenier-Boley

  • Impairment of activities of daily living requiring memory or complex reasoning as part of the MCI syndrome

    Robert Perneczky;Corina Pohl;Christian Sorg;Julia Hartmann

  • Effect of APOE genotype on amyloid plaque load and gray matter volume in Alzheimer disease

    A. Drzezga;T. Grimmer;G. Henriksen;M. Mühlau

  • Cerebral metabolic patterns at early stages of frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. A PET study.

    J Diehl;T Grimmer;A Drzezga;M Riemenschneider

  • Decline of cerebral glucose metabolism in frontotemporal dementia: a longitudinal 18F-FDG-PET-study.

    J. Diehl-Schmid;T. Grimmer;A. Drzezga;S. Bornschein

  • Imaging of amyloid plaques and cerebral glucose metabolism in semantic dementia and Alzheimer’s disease

    Alexander Drzezga;Timo Grimmer;Gjermund Henriksen;Isabelle Stangier

  • Progression to dementia in clinical subtypes of mild cognitive impairment.

    P. Alexopoulos;T. Grimmer;R. Perneczky;G. Domes

  • A European multicentre PET study of fibrillar amyloid in Alzheimer's disease

    Agneta Nordberg;Agneta Nordberg;Stephen F. Carter;Stephen F. Carter;Juha Rinne;Juha Rinne;Alexander Drzezga

  • Local Activity Determines Functional Connectivity in the Resting Human Brain: A Simultaneous FDG-PET/fMRI Study

    Valentin Riedl;Katarzyna Bienkowska;Carola Strobel;Masoud Tahmasian

  • Prevalence of amyloid-β pathology in distinct variants of primary progressive aphasia

    David Bergeron;David Bergeron;Maria L. Gorno-Tempini;Gil D. Rabinovici;Miguel A. Santos-Santos

  • White matter hyperintensities predict amyloid increase in Alzheimer's disease.

    Timo Grimmer;Maximilian Faust;Florian Auer;Panagiotis Alexopoulos

  • Cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with AD and different APOE genotypes.

    A. Drzezga;M. Riemenschneider;B. Strassner;T. Grimmer

  • Association of Cerebral Amyloid-β Aggregation With Cognitive Functioning in Persons Without Dementia.

    Willemijn J Jansen;Rik Ossenkoppele;Betty M Tijms;Anne M Fagan

  • Mild cognitive impairment with suspected nonamyloid pathology (SNAP): Prediction of progression.

    Anna Caroli;Annapaola Prestia;Samantha Galluzzi;Clarissa Ferrari

  • Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

    Diehl-Schmid J;Neumann M;Laws Sm;Perneczky R

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans Förstl
Hans Förstl Technical University of Munich
Alexander Drzezga
Alexander Drzezga University of Cologne
Robert Perneczky
Robert Perneczky Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Christian Sorg
Christian Sorg Technical University of Munich
Igor Yakushev
Igor Yakushev Technical University of Munich
Alexander Kurz
Alexander Kurz Technical University of Munich
Markus Schwaiger
Markus Schwaiger Technical University of Munich
Valentin Riedl
Valentin Riedl Technical University of Munich
Hans-Jürgen Wester
Hans-Jürgen Wester Technical University of Munich
Afra M. Wohlschläger
Afra M. Wohlschläger Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Timo Grimmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles