World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 50 17371 15940 1364 1262 194 38643

Robert Layfield publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert Layfield between 1991 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert Layfield published across 36 years, from 1991 to 2026, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2007. 9 of the 213 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2007. 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 1 publication
1991 2026

213 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert Layfield: publications per year, 1991 to 2026
Year Publications
1991 3
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 3
1997 2
1998 2
1999 5
2000 2
2001 6
2002 3
2003 7
2004 4
2005 8
2006 7
2007 14
2008 9
2009 11
2010 6
2011 11
2012 13
2013 4
2014 8
2015 9
2016 14
2017 4
2018 5
2019 8
2020 4
2021 8
2022 8
2023 10
2024 5
2025 8
2026 1
Total 213
Download as CSV

Robert Layfield publications per year - data summary

  • Robert Layfield, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from University of Nottingham, has 213 publications recorded across 36 years, from 1991 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1991 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive years are 2007 and 2016, with 14 publications each.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1992 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 36 years in the span carry no publications at all (1993, 1994 and 1995).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.5 per year counting only the 33 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 32 publications, 15% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1991-2002: 27 publications (2.3 per year); 2003-2014: 102 publications (8.5 per year); 2015-2026: 84 publications (7.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Robert Layfield publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Layfield sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 187–196 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 194 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787 194
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert Layfield publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 47–56 to 1,028+ publications.
  • Robert Layfield, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from University of Nottingham, records 194 publications - the 47th percentile of the discipline.
  • 47% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Robert Layfield, and about 53% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 197–206 publications range, and Robert Layfield ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 127–136 publications, holding 980 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 77% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 287–296 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Robert Layfield D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Layfield sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899 50
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Robert Layfield D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 65 ranges running from 40–41 to 167+ D-Index.
  • Robert Layfield, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from University of Nottingham, records 50 D-Index - the 11th percentile of the discipline.
  • 11% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Robert Layfield, and about 89% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 64–65 D-Index range, and Robert Layfield ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 58–59 D-Index, holding 1,253 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 72–73 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Robert Layfield is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research spans across the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology as well as Medicine, with specific subfields including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Organic Chemistry, Neurology, and Oncology.

Their recent publication record highlights contributions to chemical modifications of peptides and proteins, neurobiology, and cellular signaling pathways. Notable papers include:

  • Site-Selective Modification of Peptides and Proteins via Interception of Free-Radical-Mediated Dechalcogenation, 2020, Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • Site-Selective Installation of Nϵ-Modified Sidechains into Peptide and Protein Scaffolds via Visible-Light-Mediated Desulfurative C-C Bond Formation, 2021, Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • p62 overexpression induces TDP-43 cytoplasmic mislocalisation, aggregation and cleavage and neuronal death, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • ALS-associated TBK1 variant p.G175S is defective in phosphorylation of p62 and impacts TBK1-mediated signalling and TDP-43 autophagic degradation, 2020, Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
  • Cysteine-Selective Modification of Peptides and Proteins via Desulfurative C−C Bond Formation, 2022, Chemistry - A European Journal

Their work has been published repeatedly in venues such as Neuro-Oncology, IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Scientific Reports, and Angewandte Chemie.

Frequent collaborators within their research network include:

  • Farhana Haque
  • Ruman Rahman
  • Elena Faccenda
  • Anya Snary
  • Jed Long

Layfield's research topics cover a range of biochemical and pharmacological areas, including:

  • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Click Chemistry and Applications
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
  • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy

In addition to articles, Layfield has contributed to book publications, including titles published by IntechOpen. One such work is Modifications in Biomacromolecules from 2022.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Disassociation between the effects of amino acids and insulin on signaling, ubiquitin ligases, and protein turnover in human muscle.

    Paul L. Greenhaff;Leonidas Karagounis;Nicholas Peirce;Elizabeth J Simpson

  • α-Synuclein metabolism and aggregation is linked to ubiquitin-independent degradation by the proteasome

    George K Tofaris;Robert Layfield;Maria Grazia Spillantini

  • Depletion of 26S proteasomes in mouse brain neurons causes neurodegeneration and Lewy-like inclusions resembling human pale bodies

    Lynn Bedford;David Hay;Anny Devoy;Simon Paine

  • Inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in Alzheimer's disease.

    Y A Lam;C M Pickart;A Alban;M Landon

  • Proteasomal degradation of tau protein.

    Della C. David;Robert Layfield;Louise Serpell;Yolanda Narain

  • Oligodendrocytes Promote Neuronal Survival and Axonal Length by Distinct Intracellular Mechanisms: A Novel Role for Oligodendrocyte-Derived Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor

    Alastair Wilkins;Henry Majed;Robert Layfield;Alastair Compston

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Physical and Functional Interaction of Sequestosome 1 with Keap1 Regulates the Keap1-Nrf2 Cell Defense Pathway

    Ian M. Copple;Adam Lister;Akua D. Obeng;Neil R. Kitteringham

  • Neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer's disease brains contain 14-3-3 proteins.

    Layfield R;Fergusson J;Aitken A;Lowe J

  • Ubiquitin recognition by the ubiquitin-associated domain of p62 involves a novel conformational switch.

    Jed Long;Thomas R.A. Gallagher;James R. Cavey;Paul W. Sheppard

  • Pathogenesis of Paget Disease of Bone

    Stuart H. Ralston;Rob Layfield

  • Boning up on autophagy: the role of autophagy in skeletal biology.

    Irving M Shapiro;Robert Layfield;Martin Lotz;Carmine Settembre

  • Novel UBA domain mutations of SQSTM1 in Paget's disease of bone: genotype phenotype correlation, functional analysis, and structural consequences.

    Lynne J. Hocking;Gavin J. A. Lucas;Anna Daroszewska;Tim Cundy

  • SQSTM1 mutations--bridging Paget disease of bone and ALS/FTLD

    Sarah L. Rea;Veronika Majcher;Mark S. Searle;Rob Layfield

  • Role of ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders.

    Robert Layfield;James R Cavey;James Lowe

  • Oligodendrocytes promote neuronal survival and axonal length by distinct intracellular mechanisms

    Alastair Wilkins;Henry Majed;Robert Layfield;Alastair Compston

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark S. Searle
Mark S. Searle University of Nottingham
Stuart H. Ralston
Stuart H. Ralston University of Edinburgh
Neil J. Oldham
Neil J. Oldham University of Nottingham
Sergio Lavandero
Sergio Lavandero University of Chile
Boris Zhivotovsky
Boris Zhivotovsky Karolinska Institute
Evelina Gatti
Evelina Gatti Aix-Marseille University
Steven Finkbeiner
Steven Finkbeiner University of California, San Francisco
Felix Randow
Felix Randow MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology
Philippe Pierre
Philippe Pierre Aix-Marseille University
Beth Levine
Beth Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in biology and biochemistry opens doors to many rewarding fields, especially with the flexibility of online education. Students interested in health and wellness often pursue a nutritionist degree online, which can lead to positions in clinical nutrition, food science, or public health.

Those seeking advancement in healthcare leadership can consider online mha programs cahme accredited. These programs are ideal for biology or biochemistry graduates aiming for administrative or managerial roles in hospitals, clinics, or biotech organizations.

For those interested in nursing, pursuing a dnp program no clinical can be a smart choice, especially for professionals seeking advanced practice or leadership positions without in-person clinical requirements.

Additionally, a terminal degree like an online phd in healthcare management can lead to high-level research, policy, or executive roles. Online degrees provide the flexibility to continue your education and advance your career while balancing personal and work responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Layfield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles