World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
10251
World Ranking
16642
National Ranking
1314

Neil J. Oldham publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil J. Oldham sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 135 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Neil J. Oldham D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil J. Oldham sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neil J. Oldham is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields with a strong focus on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, supported by significant work in chemistry.

Their scientific contributions cover a range of topics, including:

  • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
  • Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
  • Click Chemistry and Applications

Oldham's work is often situated within the following subfields:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Spectroscopy
  • Insect Science
  • Organic Chemistry
  • Plant Science

They have collaborated frequently with other researchers, notably Robert Layfield, John A. Pickett, Jeddidiah Bellamy-Carter, Charles Ducker, and Daniel Scott.

Oldham has published in various scientific venues with repeated contributions to:

  • Analysis & Sensing
  • Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Chemistry - A European Journal
  • Nature Communications

Their recent papers reflect diverse interests across biochemistry and chemical synthesis. Selected publications include:

  • ERFVII action and modulation through oxygen-sensing in Arabidopsis thaliana (2023), Nature Communications
  • Site-Selective Installation of Nϵ-Modified Sidechains into Peptide and Protein Scaffolds via Visible-Light-Mediated Desulfurative C-C Bond Formation (2021), Angewandte Chemie International Edition
  • Analysis of insulin glulisine at the molecular level by X-ray crystallography and biophysical techniques (2021), Scientific Reports
  • Site-Selective Installation of Nϵ-Modified Sidechains into Peptide and Protein Scaffolds via Visible-Light-Mediated Desulfurative C-C Bond Formation (2021), Angewandte Chemie
  • Pea aphid odorant-binding protein ApisOBP6 discriminates between aphid sex pheromone components, aphid alarm pheromone and a host plant volatile (2023), Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Best Publications

  • Hypoxia-inducible Factor (HIF) Asparagine Hydroxylase Is Identical to Factor Inhibiting HIF (FIH) and Is Related to the Cupin Structural Family

    Kirsty S. Hewitson;Luke A. McNeill;Madeline V. Riordan;Ya-Min Tian

  • Cellular oxygen sensing: Crystal structure of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase (PHD2).

    Michael A. McDonough;Vivian Li;Emily Flashman;Rasheduzzaman Chowdhury

  • Are variations in cuticular hydrocarbons of queens and workers a reliable signal of fertility in the ant Harpegnathos saltator

    Jürgen Liebig;Christian Peeters;Neil J. Oldham;Claus Markstädter

  • Expanding the diversity of chemical protein modification allows post-translational mimicry.

    Sander I. van Kasteren;Holger B. Kramer;Henrik H. Jensen;Sandra J. Campbell

  • Metagenome Mining Reveals Polytheonamides as Posttranslationally Modified Ribosomal Peptides

    Michael F. Freeman;Cristian Gurgui;Maximilian J. Helf;Brandon I. Morinaka

  • Defensive Bacteriome Symbiont with a Drastically Reduced Genome

    Atsushi Nakabachi;Reiko Ueoka;Reiko Ueoka;Kenshiro Oshima;Roberta Teta

  • Posttranslational hydroxylation of ankyrin repeats in IκB proteins by the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) asparaginyl hydroxylase, factor inhibiting HIF (FIH)

    Matthew E. Cockman;David E. Lancaster;Ineke P. Stolze;Kirsty S. Hewitson

  • Rapid HPLC screening of jasmonate-induced increases in tobacco alkaloids, phenolics, and diterpene glycosides in Nicotiana attenuata

    Markku Keinänen;Neil J. Oldham;Ian T. Baldwin

  • Benzoic acid glucosinolate esters and other glucosinolates from Arabidopsis thaliana.

    Michael Reichelt;Paul D Brown;Bernd Schneider;Neil J Oldham

  • Structural and Mechanistic Studies on the Inhibition of the Hypoxia-inducible Transcription Factor Hydroxylases by Tricarboxylic Acid Cycle Intermediates

    Kirsty S. Hewitson;Benoit M. R. Liénard;Michael A. McDonough;Ian J. Clifton

  • Asparaginyl hydroxylation of the Notch ankyrin repeat domain by factor inhibiting hypoxia-inducible factor

    Mathew L. Coleman;Michael A. McDonough;Kirsty S. Hewitson;Charlotte Coles

  • Structural Complexity, Differential Response to Infection, and Tissue Specificity of Indolic and Phenylpropanoid Secondary Metabolism in Arabidopsis Roots

    Paweł Bednarek;Bernd Schneider;Aleš Svatoš;Neil J. Oldham

  • Collision induced unfolding of protein ions in the gas phase studied by ion mobility-mass spectrometry: The effect of ligand binding on conformational stability

    Jonathan T. S. Hopper;Neil J. Oldham

  • Glyco‐SeS: Selenenylsulfide‐Mediated Protein Glycoconjugation—A New Strategy in Post‐Translational Modification

    David P. Gamblin;Philippe Garnier;Sander van Kasteren;Neil J. Oldham

  • Terpenoid Secondary Metabolism in Arabidopsis Thaliana: cDNA Cloning, Characterization, and Functional Expression of a myrcene/(E)-beta-ocimene Synthase

    Jörg Bohlmann;Diane Martin;Neil J Oldham;Jonathan Gershenzon

  • The biosynthesis of benzoic acid glucosinolate esters in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Gerson Graser;Neil J. Oldham;Paul D. Brown;Ulrike Temp

  • The use of dioxygen by HIF prolyl hydroxylase (PHD1)

    Luke A McNeill;Kirsty S Hewitson;Jonathan M Gleadle;Louise E Horsfall

  • The methionine chain elongation pathway in the biosynthesis of glucosinolates in Eruca sativa (Brassicaceae).

    Gerson Graser;Bernd Schneider;Neil J Oldham;Jonathan Gershenzon

  • Informational constraints on optimal sex allocation in ants.

    Boomsma Jj;Nielsen J;Sundström L;Oldham Nj

  • Accumulation of soluble and wall-bound indolic metabolites in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves infected with virulent or avirulent Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato strains

    Jens Hagemeier;Bernd Schneider;Neil J. Oldham;Klaus Hahlbrock

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher J. Schofield
Christopher J. Schofield University of Oxford
Robert Layfield
Robert Layfield University of Nottingham
Jörn Piel
Jörn Piel ETH Zurich
Benjamin G. Davis
Benjamin G. Davis University of Oxford
Wilhelm Boland
Wilhelm Boland Max Planck Society
Mark S. Searle
Mark S. Searle University of Nottingham
Aleš Svatoš
Aleš Svatoš Max Planck Society
Bernd Schneider
Bernd Schneider Max Planck Society
John E. Moses
John E. Moses La Trobe University
Bert Hölldobler
Bert Hölldobler Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Neil J. Oldham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles