What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Mervyn J. Bibb focuses on Genetics, Gene, Streptomyces, Streptomyces coelicolor and Plasmid.
When carried out as part of a general Genetics research project, his work on Promoter, Coding region and Genetic linkage is frequently linked to work in Start codon, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.
His work in Codon usage bias and Transcription are all subfields of Gene research.
His Streptomyces study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Genetic recombination, DNA, Gene cluster, Chromosome and Protoplast.
His Streptomyces coelicolor research is under the purview of Biochemistry.
The concepts of his Plasmid study are interwoven with issues in Molecular biology, Transformation and Escherichia coli.
His most cited work include:
- Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide natural products: Overview and recommendations for a universal nomenclature (1048 citations)
- The relationship between base composition and codon usage in bacterial genes and its use for the simple and reliable identification of protein-coding sequences (670 citations)
- Regulation of secondary metabolism in streptomycetes (630 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Mervyn J. Bibb mainly investigates Gene, Streptomyces coelicolor, Genetics, Biochemistry and Streptomyces.
His research in Gene focuses on subjects like Computational biology, which are connected to Natural product.
His Streptomyces coelicolor study combines topics in areas such as Regulator gene, Sigma factor and Transcription.
His Genetics study frequently draws connections to other fields, such as Molecular biology.
His work in Streptomyces addresses issues such as Microbiology, which are connected to fields such as Bacteria.
His research in Plasmid intersects with topics in Restriction enzyme and Cloning vector.
He most often published in these fields:
- Gene (53.64%)
- Streptomyces coelicolor (52.32%)
- Genetics (50.99%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2020)?
- Gene (53.64%)
- Gene cluster (25.83%)
- Genetics (50.99%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Gene, Gene cluster, Genetics, Streptomyces coelicolor and Biochemistry.
His study on Gene is mostly dedicated to connecting different topics, such as Computational biology.
He has researched Gene cluster in several fields, including Plasmid, Lantibiotics, Stereochemistry, Secondary metabolite and Regulation of gene expression.
His Streptomyces coelicolor research entails a greater understanding of Streptomyces.
His Streptomyces research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Streptomyces leeuwenhoekii and Botany.
His Biosynthesis, Mutant, Peptide and Nucleoside study in the realm of Biochemistry interacts with subjects such as Tunicamycin.
Between 2010 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide natural products: Overview and recommendations for a universal nomenclature (1048 citations)
- Engineering Streptomyces coelicolor for heterologous expression of secondary metabolite gene clusters (328 citations)
- Genome-wide analysis of the role of GlnR in Streptomyces venezuelae provides new insights into global nitrogen regulation in actinomycetes (105 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His primary areas of study are Gene, Gene cluster, Genetics, Streptomyces coelicolor and Biochemistry.
Mervyn J. Bibb studies Gene, focusing on Genome in particular.
His study in Streptomyces venezuelae and Mutant is done as part of Genetics.
His Streptomyces coelicolor research incorporates themes from Heterologous expression and Microbiology.
Biosynthesis and Peptide are the subjects of his Biochemistry studies.
His study in Actinorhodin is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Plasmid, Relaxase, FLP-FRT recombination and Escherichia coli.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
