World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
24077
World Ranking
6881
National Ranking
523

Colin Campbell publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colin Campbell sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 216 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Colin Campbell D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Colin Campbell sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Colin Campbell is a researcher affiliated with the University of York in the United Kingdom. Their work is primarily situated within the Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a notable focus on intersections involving Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science, Information Systems and Management, Education, and Global and Planetary Change.

The researcher's recent contributions cover multiple topics, including Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions, Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration, Sustainability in Higher Education, Sustainability and Climate Change Governance, Microplastics and Plastic Pollution, Recycling and Waste Management Techniques, and biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties.

Among the recent papers authored by or involving Colin Campbell are:

  • Preparing interdisciplinary leadership for a sustainable future, 2020, Sustainability Science
  • Microplastics in agricultural soils following sewage sludge applications: Evidence from a 25-year study, 2025, Chemosphere
  • The Swaps Strike Back: Evaluating Expectations of One-Year Inflation, 2023, Finance and Economics Discussion Series
  • Easing AI-advertising aversion: how leadership for the greater good buffers negative response to AI-generated ads, 2025, International Journal of Advertising
  • Carbon availability affects already large species-specific differences in chemical composition of ectomycorrhizal fungal mycelia in pure culture, 2023, Mycorrhiza

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Colin Campbell include Christopher G. Boone, Gabriele Bammer, Kamaljit S. Bawa, Jennifer A. Dunne, and Iain J. Gordon.

The research has been published in various scholarly venues, including Sustainability Science, Chemosphere, Finance and Economics Discussion Series, International Journal of Advertising, and Mycorrhiza.

Colin Campbell received recognition as a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1994.

Best Publications

  • Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems

    Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo;Fernando T. Maestre;Peter B. Reich;Peter B. Reich;Thomas C. Jeffries

  • Selective influence of plant species on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere

    Susan J. Grayston;Shenquiang Wang;Colin D. Campbell;Anthony C. Edwards

  • An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus accelerates decomposition and acquires nitrogen directly from organic material

    Angela Hodge;Colin D. Campbell;Alastair H. Fitter

  • A Rapid Microtiter Plate Method To Measure Carbon Dioxide Evolved from Carbon Substrate Amendments so as To Determine the Physiological Profiles of Soil Microbial Communities by Using Whole Soil

    Colin D. Campbell;Stephen J. Chapman;Clare M. Cameron;Mitchell S. Davidson

  • The Craft Consumer: Culture, craft and consumption in a postmodern society

    Colin Campbell

  • More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing

    Colin Campbell;Colin Campbell;Justine Rapp Farrell

  • Accounting for variability in soil microbial communities of temperate upland grassland ecosystems

    Susan J. Grayston;Gwyn S. Griffith;J. L. Mawdsley;Colin D. Campbell

  • Microbial biomass and community structure in a sequence of soils with increasing fertility and changing land use

    H. Yao;Z. He;M. J. Wilson;C. D. Campbell

  • The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK

    William J. Sutherland;Susan Armstrong-Brown;Paul R. Armsworth;Brereton Tom

  • Ad Lib: When customers create the ad

    Pierre Berthon;Leyland Pitt;Colin Campbell

  • Bacterial diversity promotes community stability and functional resilience after perturbation

    M. S. Girvan;C. D. Campbell;Kenneth Stuart Killham;James Ivor Prosser

  • Understanding Consumer Conversations Around Ads in a Web 2.0 World

    Colin Campbell;Leyland F. Pitt;Michael Parent;Pierre R. Berthon

  • Use of rhizosphere carbon sources in sole carbon source tests to discriminate soil microbial communities

    C.D Campbell;S.J Grayston;D.J Hirst

  • Effect of Metal-Rich Sludge Amendments on the Soil Microbial Community

    Erland Bååth;Montserrat Díaz-Raviña;Åsa Frostegård;Colin D. Campbell

  • Links between ammonia oxidizer community structure, abundance, and nitrification potential in acidic soils.

    Huaiying Yao;Yangmei Gao;Graeme W. Nicol;Colin D. Campbell

  • Assessing shifts in microbial community structure across a range of grasslands of differing management intensity using CLPP, PLFA and community DNA techniques

    S.J Grayston;C.D Campbell;R.D Bardgett;J.L Mawdsley

  • From data to action: How marketers can leverage AI

    Colin Campbell;Colin Campbell;Sean Sands;Carla Ferraro;Hsiu-Yuan (Jody) Tsao

  • Antibiotic resistance gene abundances correlate with metal and geochemical conditions in archived Scottish soils.

    Charles W. Knapp;Seánín M. McCluskey;Brajesh K. Singh;Colin D. Campbell;Colin D. Campbell

  • Deterministic processes vary during community assembly for ecologically dissimilar taxa

    Jeff R. Powell;Senani Karunaratne;Colin D. Campbell;Colin D. Campbell;Huaiying Yao

  • Selecting biological indicators for monitoring soils: A framework for balancing scientific and technical opinion to assist policy development

    Karl Ritz;Helaina I.J. Black;Colin D. Campbell;Jim A. Harris

  • Potential bias of fungal 18S rDNA and internal transcribed spacer polymerase chain reaction primers for estimating fungal biodiversity in soil.

    Ian C. Anderson;Ian C. Anderson;Colin D. Campbell;James I. Prosser

  • It is elemental: soil nutrient stoichiometry drives bacterial diversity

    Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo;Peter B. Reich;Amit N. Khachane;Colin D. Campbell

  • Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against the B.1.617.2 variant

    Jamie Lopez Bernal;Jamie Lopez Bernal;Jamie Lopez Bernal;Nick Andrews;Nick Andrews;Charlotte Gower;Eileen Gallagher

  • Endophytic bacterial diversity in poplar trees growing on a BTEX-contaminated site: the characterisation of isolates with potential to enhance phytoremediation.

    Fiona Porteous Moore;Tanja Barac;Brigitte Borremans;Licy Oeyen

  • Good native advertising isn’t a secret

    Colin Campbell;Lawrence J. Marks

  • Preparing for an Era of Deepfakes and AI-Generated Ads: A Framework for Understanding Responses to Manipulated Advertising

    Colin L. Campbell;Kirk Plangger;Sean Sands;Jan Kietzmann

  • The Challenges Native Advertising Poses: Exploring Potential Federal Trade Commission Responses and Identifying Research Needs:

    Colin Campbell;Pamela E. Grimm

  • Segmenting consumer reactions to social network marketing

    Colin Leslie Campbell;Carla Renee Ferraro;Sean James Sands

  • Segmenting multichannel consumers across search, purchase and after-sales

    Sean Sands;Carla Ferraro;Colin Campbell;Jason Pallant

  • Does brand meaning exist in similarity or singularity

    Pierre Berthon;Leyland F. Pitt;Colin Campbell

  • Managing the human–chatbot divide: how service scripts influence service experience

    Sean Sands;Carla Ferraro;Colin Campbell;Hsiu-Yuan Tsao

  • Understanding Why Consumers Don't Skip Pre-Roll Video Ads

    C. Campbell;F. Mattison Thompson;P.E. Grimm;K. Robson

  • The role of a companion banner and sponsorship transparency in recognizing and evaluating article-style native advertising

    Colin Campbell;Nathaniel J. Evans

  • Tracking Back-Talk in Consumer-Generated Advertising: An Analysis of Two Interpretative Approaches

    Colin Campbell;Leyland F. Pitt;Michael Parent;Pierre Berthon

  • An exploratory study into brand alignment in B2B relationships

    Colin Campbell;Lisa Papania;Michael Parent;Dianne Cyr

  • Advertisements Just Aren't Advertisements Anymore: A New Typology for Evolving Forms of Online “Advertising”

    Colin Campbell;Justin Cohen;Junzhao Ma

  • Placing a Hand in the Fire: Assessing the Impact of a YouTube Experiential Learning Project on Viral Marketing Knowledge Acquisition

    Nathaniel J. Payne;Colin Campbell;Anjali S. Bal;Niall Piercy

  • Trait and image interaction: In Ecotourism Preference

    Robert E. Krider;Ariana Arguello;Colin Campbell;José-Domingo Mora

  • E‐readiness and trust: macro and micro dualities for e‐commerce in a global environment

    Pierre Berthon;Leyland Pitt;Dianne Cyr;Colin Campbell

  • Diversity in the digital age: how consumers respond to diverse virtual influencers

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Brajesh K. Singh
Brajesh K. Singh Western Sydney University
Ian C. Anderson
Ian C. Anderson Western Sydney University
Steve P. McGrath
Steve P. McGrath Rothamsted Research
Robert M. Rees
Robert M. Rees Scotland's Rural College
Christine A. Watson
Christine A. Watson Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Bruce C. Ball
Bruce C. Ball Scotland's Rural College
B. J. Chambers
B. J. Chambers Mansfield University
Graeme I. Paton
Graeme I. Paton University of Aberdeen
Karl Ritz
Karl Ritz University of Nottingham
Susan J. Grayston
Susan J. Grayston University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Colin Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles