World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 42 6557 6330 1218 1212 251 7193

Qile Zhao publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Qile Zhao between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Qile Zhao published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2025. 30 of the 274 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2025. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 29 publications 2026: 1 publication
2003 2026

274 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Qile Zhao: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 1
2006 3
2007 2
2008 5
2009 4
2010 5
2011 4
2012 8
2013 10
2014 11
2015 13
2016 11
2017 17
2018 26
2019 16
2020 11
2021 20
2022 25
2023 26
2024 25
2025 29
2026 1
Total 274
Download as CSV

Qile Zhao publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qile Zhao sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 248–257 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 251 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280 251
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Qile Zhao D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Qile Zhao sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426 42
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Qile Zhao is affiliated with Wuhan University in China and has a significant body of research focused primarily within the fields of Engineering, Earth and Planetary Sciences, and Physics and Astronomy. Their work spans multiple specific subfields, notably Aerospace Engineering, Oceanography, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, and Geophysics.

The research topics covered by Qile Zhao include GNSS positioning and interference, Geophysics and Gravity Measurements, Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics, Advanced Frequency and Time Standards, Inertial Sensor and Navigation, Earthquake Detection and Analysis, and Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies. These topics feature prominently across their scholarly contributions.

Qile Zhao's recent published papers showcase a concentration on satellite navigation systems and associated methodologies. Selected publications include:

  • Precise orbit determination for BDS satellites, 2022, Satellite Navigation
  • Initial Assessment of the BDS-3 PPP-B2b RTS compared with the CNES RTS, 2021, GPS Solutions
  • The cooperative IGS RT-GIMs: a reliable estimation of the global ionospheric electron content distribution in real time, 2021, Earth system science data
  • Orbit and clock analysis of BDS-3 satellites using inter-satellite link observations, 2020, Journal of Geodesy
  • Assessing the Performance of Multi-GNSS PPP-RTK in the Local Area, 2020, Remote Sensing

Frequent coauthors in Qile Zhao's research include Kecai Jiang, Jing Guo, Jun Tao, Wenwen Li, and Tao Geng. These collaborations indicate a networked approach often seen in multidisciplinary scientific investigations.

Qile Zhao's publications have appeared repeatedly in well-known scientific venues such as GPS Solutions, Advances in Space Research, Remote Sensing, Journal of Geodesy, and Satellite Navigation. This distribution underscores the focus on satellite navigation and geospatial science.

Best Publications

  • The Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS) - Achievements, prospects and challenges

    Oliver Montenbruck;Peter Steigenberger;Lars Prange;Zhiguo Deng

  • Precise orbit determination for quad-constellation satellites at Wuhan University: strategy, result validation, and comparison

    Jing Guo;Xiaolong Xu;Qile Zhao;Jingnan Liu

  • Precise relative positioning using real tracking data from COMPASS GEO and IGSO satellites

    Chuang Shi;Qile Zhao;Zhigang Hu;Jingnan Liu

  • Initial results of precise orbit and clock determination for COMPASS navigation satellite system

    Qile Zhao;Jing Guo;Min Li;Lizhong Qu

  • Precise orbit determination of Beidou Satellites with precise positioning

    Chuang Shi;QiLe Zhao;Min Li;WeiMing Tang

  • Improving the estimation of fractional-cycle biases for ambiguity resolution in precise point positioning

    Jianghui Geng;Jianghui Geng;Chuang Shi;Maorong Ge;Alan H. Dodson

  • Recent development of PANDA software in GNSS data processing

    Chuang Shi;Qile Zhao;Jianghui Geng;Yidong Lou

  • Precise Point Positioning with the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System

    Min Li;Lizhong Qu;Qile Zhao;Jing Guo

  • Multipath analysis of code measurements for BeiDou geostationary satellites

    Guangxing Wang;Kees Jong;Qile Zhao;Zhigang Hu

  • Real-time detection and repair of cycle slips in triple-frequency GNSS measurements

    Qile Zhao;Binzi Sun;Zhiqiang Dai;Zhigang Hu

  • Seismic deformation of the Mw 8.0 Wenchuan earthquake from high-rate GPS observations

    C. Shi;Y. Lou;H. Zhang;Q. Zhao

  • Automatic Registration of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Point Clouds using Panoramic Reflectance Images

    Zhizhong Kang;Jonathan Li;Liqiang Zhang;Qile Zhao

  • A modified phase clock/bias model to improve PPP ambiguity resolution at Wuhan University

    Jianghui Geng;Xingyu Chen;Yuanxin Pan;Qile Zhao

  • Precise orbit and clock determination for BeiDou-3 experimental satellites with yaw attitude analysis

    Qile Zhao;Chen Wang;Jing Guo;Jing Guo;Bin Wang

  • DEOS Mass Transport model (DMT-1) based on GRACE satellite data: methodology and validation

    X.L. Liu;P.G. Ditmar;C. Siemes;D.C. Slobbe

  • Precise orbit determination for BDS-3 satellites using satellite-ground and inter-satellite link observations

    Xin Xie;Tao Geng;Qile Zhao;Hongliang Cai

  • Analysis of BDS satellite clocks in orbit

    Bin Wang;Yidong Lou;Jingnan Liu;Qile Zhao

  • Performance of BDS-3: Measurement Quality Analysis, Precise Orbit and Clock Determination

    Xin Xie;Tao Geng;Qile Zhao;Jingnan Liu

  • Real‐time capture of seismic waves using high‐rate multi‐GNSS observations: Application to the 2015 Mw 7.8 Nepal earthquake

    Tao Geng;Xin Xie;Rongxin Fang;Xing Su

  • Analysis of BeiDou Satellite Measurements with Code Multipath and Geometry-Free Ionosphere-Free Combinations

    Qile Zhao;Guangxing Wang;Zhizhao Liu;Zhigang Hu

  • Three-carrier ambiguity resolution using the modified TCAR method

    Qile Zhao;Zhiqiang Dai;Zhigang Hu;Binzi Sun

  • Improvements in the Monthly Gravity Field Solutions Through Modeling the Colored Noise in the GRACE Data

    Xiang Guo;Qile Zhao;Pavel Ditmar;Yu Sun

  • BDS-3 differential code bias estimation with undifferenced uncombined model based on triple-frequency observation

    Shengfeng Gu;YinTong Wang;Qile Zhao;Fu Zheng

  • Assessing the Performance of Multi-GNSS PPP-RTK in the Local Area

    Hongyang Ma;Qile Zhao;Sandra Verhagen;Dimitrios Psychas

  • Inter-system PPP ambiguity resolution between GPS and BeiDou for rapid initialization

    Jianghui Geng;Xiaotao Li;Qile Zhao;Guangcai Li

  • Elevation-dependent pseudorange variation characteristics analysis for the new-generation BeiDou satellite navigation system

    Renyu Zhou;Zhigang Hu;Qile Zhao;Pengbo Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Chuang Shi
Chuang Shi Wuhan University
Jianghui Geng
Jianghui Geng Wuhan University
Guangxing Wang
Guangxing Wang Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Maorong Ge
Maorong Ge Technical University of Berlin
Manuel Hernández-Pajares
Manuel Hernández-Pajares Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
Riccardo Riva
Riccardo Riva Technical University of Denmark
Liang Chen
Liang Chen Beijing Institute of Technology
Xiaoji Niu
Xiaoji Niu Wuhan University
Andrzej Krankowski
Andrzej Krankowski University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn
Attila Komjathy
Attila Komjathy California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to diverse careers, but related degrees can enhance your expertise and job opportunities. For those looking to expand practical business skills, earning a bookkeeper certification is a valuable option. This certification can help students develop a strong foundation in financial recordkeeping, which is crucial for engineering project management.

Administrative skills are also highly sought after. Studying for an office administration degree online provides flexibility and equips you with the tools needed for effective operational support in technology-driven workplaces. Similarly, an online administration degree can broaden your knowledge in management and leadership, making you more adaptable within both engineering and business settings.

For professionals aiming to lead teams and projects, pursuing the cheapest online master’s in organizational leadership is an efficient way to build strategies for organizational success. Combining these related degrees with your engineering background can create a powerful profile that is attractive to employers in today’s shifting job market.

Best Scientists Citing Qile Zhao

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles