World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
7973
World Ranking
8159
National Ranking
4376

Karen J. Mitchell publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen J. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Karen J. Mitchell D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen J. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karen J. Mitchell is affiliated with West Chester University in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the social sciences, with a focus on economics and econometrics, sociology and political science, and clinical psychology. They have also contributed to fields related to surgery and global and planetary change.

Their scholarly output includes work on a variety of interconnected topics such as lipoproteins and cardiovascular health, pharmaceutical economics and policy, health systems including economic evaluations and quality of life, as well as social issues related to sex work. Additionally, their research addresses conservation, biodiversity, and resource management, along with Indigenous health, education, and rights, and geographies of human-animal interactions.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Karen J. Mitchell include:

  • "A UK multicentre audit of the management of patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia with bempedoic acid against published lipid-lowering treatment targets," 2024, published in Drugs in Context
  • "Generalizability in psychology research: Beware the grinch," 2023, published in Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
  • "Characteristics of Youth Referred to Intensive Services for Commercial Sexual Exploitation and Trafficking," 2024, published in SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Using Indigenous Science to Protect Wetlands: The Swinomish Tribe's Wetland Cultural Assessment," 2025, published in Ethnobiology Letters
  • "U.S. parks and protected area power structures: From historic policies to Indigenous futurities," 2025, published in Earth stewardship.

The frequent co-authors in Karen J. Mitchell's research include Sudarshan Ramachandran, Amro Maarouf, Tony Avades, Peter Smith, and Lee Boulton.

The scientist's work is frequently published in venues such as Drugs in Context, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, SSRN Electronic Journal, Ethnobiology Letters, and Earth stewardship.

Best Publications

  • Source monitoring 15 years later: What have we learned from fMRI about the neural mechanisms of source memory?

    Karen J. Mitchell;Marcia K. Johnson

  • fMRI evidence of age-related hippocampal dysfunction in feature binding in working memory.

    Karen J Mitchell;Marcia K Johnson;Carol L Raye;Mark D’Esposito

  • Source monitoring: Attributing mental experiences

    Karen J. Mitchell;Marcia K. Johnson

  • Dissociating medial frontal and posterior cingulate activity during self-reflection

    Marcia K. Johnson;Carol L. Raye;Karen J. Mitchell;Sharon R. Touryan

  • Aging and reflective processes of working memory: binding and test load deficits.

    Karen J. Mitchell;Marcia K. Johnson;Carol L. Raye;Mara Mather

  • Repeated Exposure to Suggestion and the Creation of False Memories

    Maria S. Zaragoza;Karen J. Mitchell

  • Long-Term Memory for the Terrorist Attack of September 11: Flashbulb Memories, Event Memories, and the Factors That Influence Their Retention

    William Hirst;Elizabeth A. Phelps;Randy L. Buckner;Andrew E. Budson

  • Emotional Arousal Can Impair Feature Binding in Working Memory

    Mara Mather;Karen J. Mitchell;Carol L. Raye;Deanna L. Novak

  • Refreshing: a minimal executive function.

    Carol L. Raye;Marcia K. Johnson;Karen J. Mitchell;Erich J. Greene

  • Source monitoring and suggestibility to misinformation: adult age-related differences

    Karen J. Mitchell;Marcia K. Johnson;Mara Mather

  • A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of September 11, 2001: Flashbulb memories and memories for flashbulb events.

    William Hirst;Elizabeth A. Phelps;Robert Meksin;Chandan J. Vaidya

  • Medial cortex activity, self-reflection and depression

    Marcia K. Johnson;Susan Nolen-Hoeksema;Karen J. Mitchell;Yael Levin

  • Second Thoughts versus Second Looks: An Age-Related Deficit in Reflectively Refreshing Just-Activated Information

    Marcia K. Johnson;John A. Reeder;Carol L. Raye;Karen J. Mitchell

  • Neuroimaging a single thought: dorsolateral PFC activity associated with refreshing just-activated information.

    Carol L. Raye;Marcia K. Johnson;Karen J. Mitchell;John A. Reeder

  • Using fMRI to investigate a component process of reflection: prefrontal correlates of refreshing a just-activated representation.

    Marcia K. Johnson;Carol L. Raye;Karen J. Mitchell;Erich J. Greene

  • Interpersonal Reality Monitoring: Judging the Sources of Other People's Memories

    Marcia K. Johnson;Julie G. Bush;Karen J. Mitchell

  • Prefrontal Cortex Activity Associated with Source Monitoring in a Working Memory Task

    Karen J. Mitchell;Marcia K. Johnson;Carol L. Raye;Erich J. Greene

  • A brief thought can modulate activity in extrastriate visual areas: Top-down effects of refreshing just-seen visual stimuli.

    Matthew R. Johnson;Karen J. Mitchell;Carol L. Raye;Mark D'Esposito

  • An Age-Related Deficit in Prefrontal Cortical Function Associated With Refreshing Information

    Marcia K. Johnson;Karen J. Mitchell;Carol L. Raye;Erich J. Greene

  • fmRI evidence for an organization of prefrontal cortex by both type of process and type of information

    Marcia K. Johnson;Carol L. Raye;Karen J. Mitchell;Erich J. Greene

  • RAPID COMMUNICATION Neuroimaging a Single Thought: Dorsolateral PFC Activity Associated with Refreshing Just-Activated Information

    Carol L. Raye;Marcia K. Johnson;Karen J. Mitchell;John A. Reeder

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcia K. Johnson
Marcia K. Johnson Yale University
Carol L. Raye
Carol L. Raye Yale University
Mara Mather
Mara Mather University of Southern California
Maria S. Zaragoza
Maria S. Zaragoza Kent State University
Jon S. Simons
Jon S. Simons University of Cambridge
Mark D'Esposito
Mark D'Esposito University of California, Berkeley
Kevin N. Ochsner
Kevin N. Ochsner Columbia University
Andrew E. Budson
Andrew E. Budson Boston University
William Hirst
William Hirst New School
Cindy Lustig
Cindy Lustig University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens multiple career avenues, especially in the field of substance abuse counseling. Many students opt for online degrees, which offer flexibility and enable them to meet diverse state requirements while balancing other commitments. Online psychology and counseling programs are becoming increasingly recognized as credible pathways toward licensure and professional growth.

It’s important to keep in mind that becoming a counselor involves meeting specific educational and certification requirements, which vary by location. For example, you can review the Stockton substance abuse counselors education requirements to see what courses and supervised experience might be needed. If you are considering a different location, you could compare the Tampa substance abuse counselor certification requirements or learn about substance abuse counselor requirements in Toledo.

Each pathway may include licensure exams, supervised practice, and specialized coursework. You can also discover the steps for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Tucson. Researching these requirements thoroughly can help you select the right online degree and local pathway to launch your psychology career with confidence.

Best Scientists Citing Karen J. Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles