World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
10202
World Ranking
9032
National Ranking
4788

Carol L. Raye publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol L. Raye sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 51 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Carol L. Raye D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol L. Raye sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carol L. Raye is affiliated with Yale University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a focus on research and teaching within this institution.

No detailed data on recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues is available for Carol L. Raye, which limits an overview of specific contributions or collaborative patterns.

There is no information provided regarding book publications or awards received, and the main fields of study, subfields, and specific research topics related to Carol L. Raye are not listed.

This absence of detailed research output or topic specialization makes it difficult to provide an in-depth analysis of their scientific work. However, the affiliation with Yale University suggests involvement in higher education and research activities consistent with that academic environment.

Best Publications

  • Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.

    Marcia K. Johnson;Mary A. Foley;Aurora G. Suengas;Carol L. Raye

  • Separable Neural Components in the Processing of Black and White Faces

    William A. Cunningham;Marcia K. Johnson;Carol L. Raye;J. Chris Gatenby

  • fMRI evidence of age-related hippocampal dysfunction in feature binding in working memory.

    Karen J Mitchell;Marcia K Johnson;Carol L Raye;Mark D’Esposito

  • Implicit and Explicit Evaluation: fMRI Correlates of Valence, Emotional Intensity, and Control in the Processing of Attitudes

    William A. Cunningham;Carol L. Raye;Marcia K. Johnson

  • Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring

    Marcia K. Johnson;Carol L. Raye;Hugh J. Foley;Mary Ann Foley

  • Dissociating medial frontal and posterior cingulate activity during self-reflection

    Marcia K. Johnson;Carol L. Raye;Karen J. Mitchell;Sharon R. Touryan

  • Aging and reflective processes of working memory: binding and test load deficits.

    Karen J. Mitchell;Marcia K. Johnson;Carol L. Raye;Mara Mather

  • The role of prefrontal cortex during tests of episodic memory.

    Scott F Nolde;Marcia K Johnson;Carol L Raye

  • Neural components of social evaluation.

    William A. Cunningham;Marcia K. Johnson;J. Chris Gatenby;John C. Gore

  • Age-related Changes in Confusion between Memories for Thoughts and Memories for Speech.

    Mary Ann Foley;Marcia K. Johnson;Carol L. Raye

  • Fact and fantasy: the roles of accuracy and variability in confusing imaginations with perceptual experiences.

    Marcia K. Johnson;Carol L. Raye;Alvin Y. Wang;Thomas H. Taylor

  • Emotional Arousal Can Impair Feature Binding in Working Memory

    Mara Mather;Karen J. Mitchell;Carol L. Raye;Deanna L. Novak

  • False memories and confabulation

    Marcia K Johnson;Carol L Raye

  • Refreshing: a minimal executive function.

    Carol L. Raye;Marcia K. Johnson;Karen J. Mitchell;Erich J. Greene

  • Neural correlates of evaluation associated with promotion and prevention regulatory focus.

    William A. Cunningham;Carol L. Raye;Marcia K. Johnson

  • Second Thoughts versus Second Looks: An Age-Related Deficit in Reflectively Refreshing Just-Activated Information

    Marcia K. Johnson;John A. Reeder;Carol L. Raye;Karen J. Mitchell

  • Neuroimaging a single thought: dorsolateral PFC activity associated with refreshing just-activated information.

    Carol L. Raye;Marcia K. Johnson;Karen J. Mitchell;John A. Reeder

  • Using fMRI to investigate a component process of reflection: prefrontal correlates of refreshing a just-activated representation.

    Marcia K. Johnson;Carol L. Raye;Karen J. Mitchell;Erich J. Greene

  • Cognitive and brain mechanisms of false memories and beliefs.

    Marcia K. Johnson;Carol L. Raye

  • Dreams and reality monitoring.

    Marcia K. Johnson;Tracey L. Kahan;Carol L. Raye

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcia K. Johnson
Marcia K. Johnson Yale University
Karen J. Mitchell
Karen J. Mitchell West Chester University
William A. Cunningham
William A. Cunningham University of Toronto
Mara Mather
Mara Mather University of Southern California
Charles A. Sanislow
Charles A. Sanislow Wesleyan University
Susan Nolen-Hoeksema
Susan Nolen-Hoeksema Yale University
Mahzarin R. Banaji
Mahzarin R. Banaji Harvard University
Lynn Hasher
Lynn Hasher University of Toronto
Norman A. S. Farb
Norman A. S. Farb University of Toronto
Paul C. Fletcher
Paul C. Fletcher University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which require professional licensure. If you are considering becoming a Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC), it is important to understand that requirements differ by state across the USA.

Online psychology degrees often provide the academic foundation needed for licensure, but each state—such as Arkansas lpc licensure requirements—has unique steps related to supervised clinical hours, educational credentials, and examination processes. In California, for example, you would need to follow the specific lpc license requirements in California, while aspiring counselors in Colorado must be aware of the lpc licensure requirements in Colorado.

Likewise, students seeking practice in Connecticut should review the lpc license requirements in Connecticut. No matter which state you choose, it is vital to research local regulations before enrolling in an online program. Thorough planning ensures that your education meets professional standards and sets you on the right path toward a rewarding mental health career.

Best Scientists Citing Carol L. Raye

Recently Published Articles