World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
109
Citations
57670
World Ranking
409
National Ranking
258

Neuroscience

D-Index
109
Citations
57772
World Ranking
549
National Ranking
312

Roberto Cabeza publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Cabeza sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 254 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Roberto Cabeza D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Roberto Cabeza sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 109 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Roberto Cabeza is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and focuses on research in Neuroscience, with a particular emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience. Their work encompasses subfields such as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Neurology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Social Psychology.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

Recent publications by Roberto Cabeza span several well-known academic journals. These include:

  • "A framework for concepts of reserve and resilience in aging", 2022, Neurobiology of Aging
  • "Visual and Semantic Representations Predict Subsequent Memory in Perceptual and Conceptual Memory Tests", 2020, Cerebral Cortex
  • "The visual and semantic features that predict object memory: Concept property norms for 1,000 object images", 2021, Memory & Cognition
  • "Cortical Overlap and Cortical-Hippocampal Interactions Predict Subsequent True and False Memory", 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Age-related dedifferentiation and hyperdifferentiation of perceptual and mnemonic representations", 2021, Neurobiology of Aging

Roberto Cabeza has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Simon W. Davis
  • Mariam Hovhannisyan
  • Benjamin R. Geib
  • Zachary A. Monge
  • Shenyang Huang

Their research has been published in multiple venues, with repeated publications in these journals:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cerebral Cortex
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neurobiology of Aging
  • Memory & Cognition

Best Publications

  • Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies

    Roberto Cabeza;Lars Nyberg

  • Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model.

    Roberto Cabeza

  • Aging gracefully: compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults.

    Roberto Cabeza;Nicole D. Anderson;Jill K. Locantore;Anthony R. McIntosh

  • Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory

    Kevin S LaBar;Roberto Cabeza

  • Qué PASA? The Posterior–Anterior Shift in Aging

    Simon W. Davis;Nancy A. Dennis;Sander M. Daselaar;Mathias S. Fleck

  • The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account

    Roberto Cabeza;Elisa Ciaramelli;Ingrid R. Olson;Morris Moscovitch

  • Episodic Memory and Beyond: The Hippocampus and Neocortex in Transformation

    Morris Moscovitch;Roberto Cabeza;Gordon Winocur;Lynn Nadel

  • Maintenance, reserve and compensation: the cognitive neuroscience of healthy ageing

    Roberto Cabeza;Marilyn Albert;Sylvie Belleville;Fergus I. M. Craik

  • Age-Related Differences in Neural Activity during Memory Encoding and Retrieval: A Positron Emission Tomography Study

    Roberto Cabeza;Cheryl L. Grady;Lars Nyberg;Anthony R. McIntosh

  • Task-independent and Task-specific Age Effects on Brain Activity during Working Memory, Visual Attention and Episodic Retrieval

    Roberto Cabeza;Sander M. Daselaar;Florin Dolcos;Steven E. Prince

  • Functional neuroimaging of autobiographical memory

    Roberto Cabeza;Peggy St Jacques

  • Interaction between the amygdala and the medial temporal lobe memory system predicts better memory for emotional events.

    Florin Dolcos;Florin Dolcos;Kevin S LaBar;Roberto Cabeza

  • PET studies of encoding and retrieval: The HERA model.

    Lars Nyberg;Roberto Cabeza;Endel Tulving

  • Imaging cognition: An empirical review of pet studies with normal subjects

    Roberto Cabeza;Lars Nyberg

  • Remembering one year later: Role of the amygdala and the medial temporal lobe memory system in retrieving emotional memories

    Florin Dolcos;Kevin S. LaBar;Roberto Cabeza

  • Similarities and differences in the neural correlates of episodic memory retrieval and working memory.

    Roberto Cabeza;Florin Dolcos;Florin Dolcos;Reiko Graham;Lars Nyberg

  • Dissociable effects of arousal and valence on prefrontal activity indexing emotional evaluation and subsequent memory: an event-related fMRI study.

    Florin Dolcos;Kevin S. LaBar;Roberto Cabeza

  • Hemispheric asymmetry and aging: right hemisphere decline or asymmetry reduction.

    Florin Dolcos;Heather J Rice;Roberto Cabeza

  • Event-related potentials of emotional memory: encoding pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral pictures.

    Florin Dolcos;Rooberto Cabeza

  • Assessing the effects of age on long white matter tracts using diffusion tensor tractography

    Simon W. Davis;Nancy A. Dennis;Norbou G. Buchler;Leonard E. White

  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

    S.M. Daselaar;S.E. Prince;N.A. Dennis;S.M. Hayes

Frequent Co-Authors

Lars Nyberg
Lars Nyberg Umeå University
Sander M. Daselaar
Sander M. Daselaar Radboud University
Nancy A. Dennis
Nancy A. Dennis Pennsylvania State University
Sarah H. Lisanby
Sarah H. Lisanby Arizona State University
Florin Dolcos
Florin Dolcos University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Kevin S. LaBar
Kevin S. LaBar Duke University
Anthony R. McIntosh
Anthony R. McIntosh Simon Fraser University
Angel V. Peterchev
Angel V. Peterchev Duke University
Endel Tulving
Endel Tulving University of Toronto
David J. Madden
David J. Madden Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study psychology opens up a variety of degree options and career paths, especially with the growth of flexible online programs. A key consideration is deciding what is the difference between psychology ba and bs, as this can impact the courses you take and your future specializations.

For those seeking advanced credentials quickly, there are options such as fastest online psyd programs and accelerated psychology degree online psychology. These condensed formats help you enter the workforce sooner or pursue doctoral studies without a lengthy time commitment.

Many professionals also explore niches like applied behavior analysis online, which is ideal for those interested in working with individuals with behavioral or developmental needs.

Whether you’re interested in foundational psychology, specialized areas, or rapid pathways, researching these online degree options can help you align your studies with your career ambitions and personal schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Roberto Cabeza

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles