World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4577 4237 306 285 258 11748

Elizabeth M. Saewyc publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elizabeth M. Saewyc between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elizabeth M. Saewyc published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2017. 25 of the 301 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2017. 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 11 publications
1998 2025

301 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elizabeth M. Saewyc: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 3
1999 2
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 2
2004 7
2005 5
2006 12
2007 7
2008 10
2009 13
2010 8
2011 10
2012 12
2013 22
2014 14
2015 14
2016 13
2017 23
2018 13
2019 17
2020 23
2021 18
2022 11
2023 13
2024 14
2025 11
Total 301
Download as CSV

Elizabeth M. Saewyc publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth M. Saewyc sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 251–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 258 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201 258
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Elizabeth M. Saewyc D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth M. Saewyc sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Elizabeth M. Saewyc is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily spans psychology, health professions, and medicine, with significant contributions in these scientific fields.

The scientist's work covers a variety of subfields, including general health professions, social psychology, clinical psychology, infectious diseases, and gender studies. Their research topics are diverse, with notable focus areas such as LGBTQ health, identity, and policy; adolescent sexual and reproductive health; sexuality, behavior, and technology; HIV/AIDS research and interventions; food security and health in diverse populations; reproductive health and technologies; and child and adolescent health.

Elizabeth M. Saewyc has published extensively in several academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Adolescent Health
  • LGBT Health
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing
  • Journal of Adolescence
  • PEDIATRICS

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Saewyc include:

  • Hormone therapy decision-making processes: Transgender youth and parents, 2020, Journal of Adolescence
  • Associations Between Community-Level LGBTQ-Supportive Factors and Substance Use Among Sexual Minority Adolescents, 2020, LGBT Health
  • Conditions for shared decision making in the care of transgender youth in Canada, 2020, Health Promotion International
  • A Scoping Review of Adolescent Health Indicators, 2021, Journal of Adolescent Health
  • The link between LGBTQ-supportive communities, progressive political climate, and suicidality among sexual minority adolescents in Canada, 2020, Preventive Medicine

Collaboration plays a notable role in Saewyc's research activities. Frequent co-authors include Michele L. Ybarra, Ace Chan, Monica Rana, Ronita Nath, and Ashley B. Taylor, with multiple publications together demonstrating ongoing partnership in several studies.

Best Publications

  • A Meta-Analysis of Disparities in Childhood Sexual Abuse, Parental Physical Abuse, and Peer Victimization Among Sexual Minority and Sexual Nonminority Individuals

    Mark S. Friedman;Michael P. Marshal;Thomas E. Guadamuz;Chongyi Wei

  • RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENT SEXUAL ORIENTATION: DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH DISPARITIES, STIGMA AND RESILIENCE.

    Elizabeth M. Saewyc

  • Mental Health Disparities Among Canadian Transgender Youth.

    Jaimie F. Veale;Ryan J. Watson;Tracey Peter;Elizabeth M. Saewyc

  • Depression and Suicide Ideation Among Students Accessing Campus Health Care

    Sara Mackenzie;Jennifer R. Wiegel;Marlon Mundt;David Brown

  • Measuring sexual orientation in adolescent health surveys: evaluation of eight school-based surveys.

    Elizabeth M. Saewyc;Greta R. Bauer;Carol L. Skay;Linda H. Bearinger

  • Hazards of stigma: the sexual and physical abuse of gay, lesbian, and bisexual adolescents in the United States and Canada.

    Elizabeth M. Saewyc;Carol L. Skay;Sandra L Pettingell;Elizabeth A. Reis

  • Safe Schools Policy for LGBTQ Students and commentaries

    Stephen T. Russell;Stacey Horn;Joseph Kosciw;Elizabeth Saewyc

  • Sexual intercourse, abuse and pregnancy among adolescent women: does sexual orientation make a difference?

    Elizabeth M. Saewyc;Linda H. Bearinger;Robert Wm Blum;Michael D. Resnick

  • Teenage Pregnancy and Associated Risk Behaviors Among Sexually Abused Adolescents

    Elizabeth M. Saewyc;Lara Leanne Magee;Sandra E. Pettingell

  • Disordered eating behaviors among transgender youth: Probability profiles from risk and protective factors

    Ryan J. Watson;Jaimie F. Veale;Elizabeth M. Saewyc

  • Non-binary youth: Access to gender-affirming primary health care

    Beth A. Clark;Jaimie F. Veale;Marria Townsend;Hélène Frohard-Dourlent

  • School-Based Strategies to Reduce Suicidal Ideation, Suicide Attempts, and Discrimination among Sexual Minority and Heterosexual Adolescents in Western Canada.

    Elizabeth M. Saewyc;Chiaki Konishi;Hilary A. Rose;Yuko Homma

  • Enacted stigma, mental health, and protective factors among transgender youth in Canada

    Jaimie F. Veale;Tracey Peter;Robb Travers;Elizabeth M. Saewyc

  • Protective Factors in the Lives of Bisexual Adolescents in North America

    Elizabeth M. Saewyc;Yuko Homma;Carol L. Skay;Linda H. Bearinger

  • Sexual orientation, sexual abuse, and HIV-risk behaviors among adolescents in the Pacific Northwest.

    Elizabeth Saewyc;Carol L. Skay;Kimberly Richens;Elizabeth Reis

  • The Relationship Between Sexual Abuse and Risky Sexual Behavior Among Adolescent Boys: A Meta-Analysis

    Yuko Homma;Naren Wang;Elizabeth Saewyc;Nand Kishor

  • “I would have preferred more options”: accounting for non-binary youth in health research

    Hélène Frohard-Dourlent;Sarah Dobson;Beth A. Clark;Marion Doull

  • Stigma management? The links between enacted stigma and teen pregnancy trends among gay, lesbian, and bisexual students in British Columbia

    Elizabeth M. Saewyc;Colleen S. Poon;Yuko Homma;Carol L. Skay

  • Out yonder: sexual-minority adolescents in rural communities in British Columbia.

    Colleen S. Poon;Elizabeth M. Saewyc

  • Trends and disparities in disordered eating among heterosexual and sexual minority adolescents.

    Ryan J. Watson;Jones Adjei;Elizabeth Saewyc;Yuko Homma

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryan J. Watson
Ryan J. Watson University of Connecticut
Marla E. Eisenberg
Marla E. Eisenberg University of Minnesota
Linda H. Bearinger
Linda H. Bearinger University of Minnesota
Amy L. Gower
Amy L. Gower University of Minnesota
Michael D. Resnick
Michael D. Resnick University of Minnesota
John L. Oliffe
John L. Oliffe University of British Columbia
Heather L. Corliss
Heather L. Corliss San Diego State University
Michele L. Ybarra
Michele L. Ybarra Johns Hopkins University
Saoirse Nic Gabhainn
Saoirse Nic Gabhainn University of Galway
Margaret Rosario
Margaret Rosario City University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open a variety of career doors, especially in the field of substance abuse counseling. Many who earn a psychology degree choose to pursue online programs that allow them to specialize in addiction counseling. These online pathways are especially valuable for students balancing work and studies, and for meeting regional certification needs.

Educational and licensure requirements often vary by location. For example, those interested in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Riverside must complete specific supervised experience and credentialing steps. Similarly, Sacramento substance abuse counselors education requirements focus on curriculum and practical training mandates that differ from other regions.

If you are considering relocation or working in different states, research how to how to become a substance abuse counselor in Saint Paul or how to become a substance abuse counselor in San Antonio. These careers often require state-specific certifications, but foundational skills gained in psychology programs remain broadly relevant across the U.S.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth M. Saewyc

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles