World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
11531
World Ranking
4401
National Ranking
2449

Michael E. Newcomb publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. Newcomb sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 191 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael E. Newcomb D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael E. Newcomb sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael E. Newcomb is a researcher affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields including psychology, medicine, and social sciences, with a substantial focus on social psychology, infectious diseases, general health professions, sociology and political science, and clinical psychology.

Their research encompasses a range of topics primarily centered on LGBTQ health, identity, and policy, HIV/AIDS research and interventions, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, reproductive health and technologies, sex work and related issues, sexuality, behavior, and technology, as well as attachment and relationship dynamics.

Michael E. Newcomb has contributed to several recent papers including:

  • "Perspectives from Transgender and Gender Diverse People on How to Ask About Gender," 2020, LGBT Health
  • "Rumination longitudinally mediates the association of minority stress and depression in sexual and gender minority individuals," 2020, Journal of Abnormal Psychology
  • "Longitudinal associations between minority stress, internalizing symptoms, and substance use among sexual and gender minority individuals assigned female at birth," 2020, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • "Systems of cissexism and the daily production of stress for transgender and gender diverse people," 2021, International Journal of Transgender Health
  • "Gender variations, generational effects, and mental health of transgender people in relation to timing and status of gender identity milestones," 2021, Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Michael E. Newcomb include:

  • Brian Mustanski
  • Sarah W. Whitton
  • Christina Dyar
  • Elissa L. Sarno
  • Gregory Swann

Publication venues where Michael E. Newcomb has frequently published their work include:

  • AIDS and Behavior
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity
  • LGBT Health
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Best Publications

  • Internalized homophobia and internalizing mental health problems: a meta-analytic review.

    Michael E. Newcomb;Brian Mustanski

  • HIV in Young Men Who Have Sex with Men: A Review of Epidemiology, Risk and Protective Factors, and Interventions

    Brian S. Mustanski;Michael E. Newcomb;Steve Nicholas Du Bois;Steve C. Garcia

  • Barriers to Gender-Affirming Care for Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Individuals.

    Jae A. Puckett;Peter Cleary;Kinton Rossman;Brian Mustanski

  • Gay and Bisexual Men's Use of the Internet: Research from the 1990s through 2013

    Christian Grov;Aaron S. Breslow;Michael E. Newcomb;Joshua G. Rosenberger

  • Internal and external mediators of women's sexual abuse in childhood

    Gail Elizabeth Wyatt;Michael Newcomb

  • High Burden of Mental Health Problems, Substance Use, Violence, and Related Psychosocial Factors in Transgender, Non-Binary, and Gender Diverse Youth and Young Adults

    Michael E. Newcomb;Ricky Hill;Kathleen Buehler;Daniel T. Ryan

  • Mental Health of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Youths: A Developmental Resiliency Perspective

    Brian Mustanski;Michael E. Newcomb;Robert Garofalo

  • Does it get better? A longitudinal analysis of psychological distress and victimization in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning youth

    Michelle Birkett;Michael E. Newcomb;Brian Mustanski

  • Moderators of the relationship between internalized homophobia and risky sexual behavior in men who have sex with men: a meta-analysis.

    Michael E. Newcomb;Brian Mustanski

  • Relationship characteristics and sexual risk-taking in young men who have sex with men.

    Brian Mustanski;Michael E. Newcomb;Elise M. Clerkin

  • Examining Risk and Protective Factors for Alcohol Use in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Youth: A Longitudinal Multilevel Analysis

    Michael E. Newcomb;Adrienne J. Heinz;Brian Mustanski

  • Intimate Partner Violence Victimization in LGBT Young Adults: Demographic Differences and Associations with Health Behaviors.

    Tyson R. Reuter;Michael E. Newcomb;Sarah W. Whitton;Brian Mustanski

  • The Influence of Families on LGBTQ Youth Health: A Call to Action for Innovation in Research and Intervention Development

    Michael E. Newcomb;Michael C. LaSala;Alida Bouris;Brian Mustanski

  • Mental health and resilience in transgender individuals: What type of support makes a difference?

    Jae A. Puckett;Emmie Matsuno;Christina Dyar;Brian Mustanski

  • Young adult gay and bisexual men's stigma experiences and mental health: An 8-year longitudinal study.

    John E. Pachankis;Timothy J. Sullivan;Brian A. Feinstein;Michael E. Newcomb

  • Sexual Orientation, Gender, and Racial Differences in Illicit Drug Use in a Sample of US High School Students

    Michael E. Newcomb;Michelle Birkett;Heather L. Corliss;Brian S. Mustanski

  • Sensation Seeking Moderates the Effects of Alcohol and Drug Use Prior to Sex on Sexual Risk in Young Men Who Have Sex with Men

    Michael E. Newcomb;Elise M. Clerkin;Brian Mustanski

  • A Longitudinal Study of IPV Victimization Among Sexual Minority Youth

    Sarah W. Whitton;Michael E. Newcomb;Adam M. Messinger;Gayle Byck

  • The effects of sexual partnership and relationship characteristics on three sexual risk variables in young men who have sex with men.

    Michael E. Newcomb;Daniel T. Ryan;Robert Garofalo;Brian Mustanski

  • Partner Disclosure of PrEP Use and Undetectable Viral Load on Geosocial Networking Apps: Frequency of Disclosure and Decisions About Condomless Sex.

    Michael E. Newcomb;Melissa C. Mongrella;Benjamin Weis;Samuel J. McMillen

  • Racial differences in same-race partnering and the effects of sexual partnership characteristics on HIV Risk in MSM: a prospective sexual diary study.

    Michael E. Newcomb;Brian Mustanski

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian Mustanski
Brian Mustanski Northwestern University
Sarah W. Whitton
Sarah W. Whitton University of Cincinnati
Brian A. Feinstein
Brian A. Feinstein Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science
Christina Dyar
Christina Dyar The Ohio State University
Kathryn Macapagal
Kathryn Macapagal Northwestern University
Michelle Birkett
Michelle Birkett Northwestern University
Robert Garofalo
Robert Garofalo Northwestern University
Richard T. D'Aquila
Richard T. D'Aquila Northwestern University
Gregory Phillips
Gregory Phillips Northwestern University
Conall O’Cleirigh
Conall O’Cleirigh Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career opportunities in social services and mental health. Many students considering Psychology also look at careers in social work, where requirements can vary by state. In Florida, for example, you’ll need to meet specific social worker degree requirements in Florida before you can practice.

Georgia also has its own guidelines, so it’s important to research the degree needed to be a social worker in Georgia if you plan to work in that state. Requirements in Hawaii differ too; you’ll want to understand the Hawaii education requirements for social workers to get licensed there.

Even states like Idaho have unique guidelines. You can learn more about the Idaho minimum degree requirement for social workers to see what’s involved.

Whether you want to pursue clinical practice, counseling, or community engagement, researching these pathways and their educational requirements is essential for success in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Michael E. Newcomb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles