World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
35532
World Ranking
10796
National Ranking
5555

Maureen G. Maguire publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maureen G. Maguire sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 490 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Maureen G. Maguire D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maureen G. Maguire sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maureen G. Maguire is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with a significant emphasis on ophthalmology and related subfields.

Their scholarly output includes numerous publications centered on eye health, particularly retinal diseases and treatments. Key areas of study include retinal imaging and analysis, retinal and optic conditions, glaucoma and retinal disorders, ocular surface and contact lens research, ophthalmology and visual impairment studies, and retinal development and disorders.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Ophthalmology
  • JAMA Ophthalmology
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Ophthalmic Epidemiology
  • Translational Vision Science & Technology

Significant recent papers by Maureen G. Maguire include:

  • Five-Year Outcomes after Initial Aflibercept, Bevacizumab, or Ranibizumab Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema (Protocol T Extension Study), 2020, Ophthalmology
  • Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab for Treatment of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, 2020, Ophthalmology
  • Associations of Variation in Retinal Thickness With Visual Acuity and Anatomic Outcomes in Eyes With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Lesions Treated With Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents, 2020, JAMA Ophthalmology
  • Effect of Intravitreous Aflibercept vs Vitrectomy With Panretinal Photocoagulation on Visual Acuity in Patients With Vitreous Hemorrhage From Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, 2020, JAMA
  • Systemic Conditions Associated with Severity of Dry Eye Signs and Symptoms in the Dry Eye Assessment and Management Study, 2021, Ophthalmology

Collaborations have involved several frequent coauthors including Gui-Shuang Ying, Daniel Martín, Glenn J. Jaffe, Ebenezer Daniel, and Jennifer K. Sun. These partnerships suggest a strong network of research activity within ocular and retinal study communities.

The scope of Maureen G. Maguire's work reflects a blend of clinical and epidemiological approaches to ophthalmologic conditions, with research outcomes often published in prominent journals dedicated to eye health and medical science.

Best Publications

  • Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

    Daniel F Martin;Maureen G Maguire;Gui-shuang Ying

  • Safety and Efficacy of Gene Transfer for Leber's Congenital Amaurosis

    Albert M. Maguire;Francesca Simonelli;Eric A. Pierce;Edward N. Pugh

  • Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results.

    Daniel F. Martin;Maureen G. Maguire;Stuart L. Fine;Gui Shuang Ying

  • Relation of Visual Function to Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Multiple Sclerosis

    Jennifer B. Fisher;Dina A. Jacobs;Clyde E. Markowitz;Steven L. Galetta

  • Five-Year Outcomes with Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials

    Maureen G. Maguire;Daniel F. Martin;Gui shuang Ying;Glenn J. Jaffe

  • Risk Factors for Corneal Graft Failure and Rejection in the Collaborative Corneal Transplantation Studies

    Maureen G. Maguire;Walter J. Stark;John D. Gottsch;R. Doyle Stulting

  • Risk of geographic atrophy in the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials.

    Juan E. Grunwald;Ebenezer Daniel;Jiayan Huang;Gui Shuang Ying

  • Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in pathologic myopia with verteporfin - 1-year results of a randomized clinical trial - VIP report no. 1

    J. Arnold;D. Kilmartin;J. Olson;S. Neville

  • Evaluation of Grid Pattern Photocoagulation for Macular Edema in Central Vein Occlusion: The Central Vein Occlusion Study Group M Report

    John G. Clarkson;Elaine Chuang;Donald Gass;Maria Pedroso

  • Relationship of Drusen and Abnormalities of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium to the Prognosis of Neovascular Macular Degeneration

    Susan B. Bressler;Maureen G. Maguire;Neil M. Bressler;Stuart L. Fine

  • Longitudinal study of vision and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in multiple sclerosis.

    Lauren S. Talman;Esther R. Bisker;David J. Sackel;David A. Long

  • Frequency of Adverse Systemic Reactions after Fluorescein Angiography: Results of a Prospective Study

    Kris A. Kwiterovich;Maureen G. Maguire;Robert P. Murphy;Andrew P. Schachat

  • Foveolar choroidal blood flow in age-related macular degeneration.

    J E Grunwald;S M Hariprasad;J DuPont;M G Maguire

  • Risk factors for choroidal neovascularization in the second eye of patients with juxtafoveal or subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration

    Maureen G. Maguire;Susan B. Bressler;Neil M. Bresskr;Judith Alexander

  • The King-Devick test as a determinant of head trauma and concussion in boxers and MMA fighters

    K. M. Galetta;J. Barrett;Mike Allen;F. Madda

  • Baseline Predictors for One-Year Visual Outcomes with Ranibizumab or Bevacizumab for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

    Gui Shuang Ying;Jiayan Huang;Maureen G. Maguire;Glenn J. Jaffe

  • Reduced foveolar choroidal blood flow in eyes with increasing AMD severity.

    Juan E. Grunwald;Tatyana I. Metelitsina;Joan C. DuPont;Gui-Shuang Ying

  • Risk of Scar in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials

    Ebenezer Daniel;Cynthia A. Toth;Juan E. Grunwald;Glenn J. Jaffe

  • Ganglion cell loss in relation to visual disability in multiple sclerosis.

    Scott D. Walter;Hiroshi Ishikawa;Kristin M. Galetta;Reiko E. Sakai

  • Psychophysical Evidence for Rod Vulnerability in Age-Related Macular Degeneration

    Cynthia Owsley;Gregory R. Jackson;Artur V. Cideciyan;Yijun Huang

Frequent Co-Authors

Glenn J. Jaffe
Glenn J. Jaffe Duke University
Stuart L. Fine
Stuart L. Fine University of Colorado Denver
Cynthia A. Toth
Cynthia A. Toth Duke University
Graham E. Quinn
Graham E. Quinn Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Neil M. Bressler
Neil M. Bressler Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Frederick L. Ferris
Frederick L. Ferris National Institutes of Health
Laura J. Balcer
Laura J. Balcer New York University
Susan B. Bressler
Susan B. Bressler Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Steven Galetta
Steven Galetta New York University Langone Medical Center
Lee M. Jampol
Lee M. Jampol Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in expanding your options beyond traditional medical school? There are a growing number of online degree programs in healthcare, making it possible to build a rewarding career in medicine-related fields without attending in-person classes. For those seeking rapid advancement, consider accelerated msn psychiatric np programs, which prepare you to become a psychiatric nurse practitioner in less time than conventional programs.

If you’re seeking an entry point into healthcare leadership, exploring the cheapest online healthcare administration degree options can help you launch your management career with minimal upfront cost. For those who already hold a bachelor’s and want to move up, earning a master's in healthcare administration online offers flexibility while developing in-demand leadership skills.

Finally, practicing nurses looking to reach the pinnacle of clinical practice should explore the best dnp programs online, which enable you to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice primarily from home. These pathways make healthcare careers more accessible, affordable, and adaptable to your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Maureen G. Maguire

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles