World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cynthia A. Toth

Cynthia A. Toth

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
27175
World Ranking
13665
National Ranking
6940

Cynthia A. Toth publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cynthia A. Toth sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 573 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Cynthia A. Toth D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cynthia A. Toth sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cynthia A. Toth is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has a research focus primarily within Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Ophthalmology. Their scholarly contributions include significant work in Retinopathy of Prematurity Studies as well as Retinal Diseases and Treatments.

Their research covers a range of topics including Retinal Imaging and Analysis, Neonatal and Fetal Brain Pathology, Glaucoma and Retinal Disorders, Retinal and Macular Surgery, and Retinal and Optic Conditions.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Cynthia A. Toth include:

  • Shwetha Mangalesh
  • Lejla Vajzovic
  • Vincent Tai
  • Christian Viehland
  • Sharon F. Freedman

Their research has been published extensively in specialized ophthalmic and pediatric journals. The most common publication venues are:

  • Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus
  • JAMA Ophthalmology
  • Ophthalmology Retina
  • Translational Vision Science & Technology
  • Ophthalmology

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Cynthia A. Toth include:

  • International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity, Third Edition, 2021, Ophthalmology
  • Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab for Treatment of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, 2020, Ophthalmology
  • Long-term Outcomes of Adding Lutein/Zeaxanthin and ω-3 Fatty Acids to the AREDS Supplements on Age-Related Macular Degeneration Progression, 2022, JAMA Ophthalmology
  • Artificial Intelligence for Retinopathy of Prematurity, 2022, Ophthalmology
  • Macular OCT Characteristics at 36 Weeks' Postmenstrual Age in Infants Examined for Retinopathy of Prematurity, 2020, Ophthalmology Retina

Cynthia A. Toth's work demonstrates an integration of ophthalmologic clinical research with imaging technologies and pediatric health, which aligns with their involvement in subfields such as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Biomedical Engineering, and Molecular Biology.

Best Publications

  • Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results.

    Daniel F. Martin;Maureen G. Maguire;Stuart L. Fine;Gui Shuang Ying

  • Lutein + zeaxanthin and omega-3 fatty acids for age-related macular degeneration: The Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 (AREDS2) randomized clinical trial

    Emily Y. Chew;Traci E. Clemons;John Paul SanGiovanni;Ronald Danis

  • Automatic segmentation of seven retinal layers in SDOCT images congruent with expert manual segmentation

    Stephanie J. Chiu;Xiao T. Li;Peter Nicholas;Cynthia A. Toth

  • Five-Year Outcomes with Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials

    Maureen G. Maguire;Daniel F. Martin;Gui shuang Ying;Glenn J. Jaffe

  • Risk of geographic atrophy in the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials.

    Juan E. Grunwald;Ebenezer Daniel;Jiayan Huang;Gui Shuang Ying

  • International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity, Third Edition.

    Michael F. Chiang;Graham E. Quinn;Alistair R. Fielder;Susan R. Ostmo

  • Secondary Analyses of the Effects of Lutein/Zeaxanthin on Age-Related Macular Degeneration Progression: AREDS2 Report No. 3

    Emily Y. Chew;Traci E. Clemons;John Paul SanGiovanni;Ronald P. Danis

  • Fibrin Directs Early Retinal Damage after Experimental Subretinal Hemorrhage

    C. A. Toth;L. S. Morse;L. M. Hjelmeland;M. B. Landers

  • Quantitative Classification of Eyes with and without Intermediate Age-related Macular Degeneration Using Optical Coherence Tomography

    Sina Farsiu;Stephanie J Chiu;Rachelle V O'Connell;Francisco A Folgar

  • Baseline Predictors for One-Year Visual Outcomes with Ranibizumab or Bevacizumab for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration

    Gui Shuang Ying;Jiayan Huang;Maureen G. Maguire;Glenn J. Jaffe

  • Risk of Scar in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials

    Ebenezer Daniel;Cynthia A. Toth;Juan E. Grunwald;Glenn J. Jaffe

  • A comparison of retinal morphology viewed by optical coherence tomography and by light microscopy

    C A Toth;D G Narayan;S A Boppart;M R Hee

  • Apolipoprotein E allele-dependent pathogenesis: A model for age-related retinal degeneration

    G. Malek;L. V. Johnson;B. E. Mace;P. Saloupis

  • Photoreceptor layer thinning over drusen in eyes with age-related macular degeneration imaged in vivo with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

    Stefanie G. Schuman;Anjum F. Koreishi;Sina Farsiu;Sin ho Jung

  • Histologic Development of the Human Fovea From Midgestation to Maturity

    Anita Hendrickson;Daniel Possin;Lejla Vajzovic;Cynthia A. Toth

  • Dry age-related macular degeneration: mechanisms, therapeutic targets, and imaging.

    Catherine Bowes Rickman;Sina Farsiu;Cynthia A. Toth;Mikael Klingeborn

  • Sparsity based denoising of spectral domain optical coherence tomography images

    Leyuan Fang;Shutao Li;Qing Nie;Joseph A. Izatt

  • Macular morphology and visual acuity in the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials.

    Glenn J. Jaffe;Daniel F. Martin;Cynthia A. Toth;Ebenezer Daniel

  • Pars plana vitrectomy, subretinal injection of tissue plasminogen activator, and fluid-gas exchange for displacement of thick submacular hemorrhage in age-related macular degeneration.

    Christopher L Haupert;Brooks W McCuen;Glenn J Jaffe;Eric R Steuer

  • Progression of intermediate age-related macular degeneration with proliferation and inner retinal migration of hyperreflective foci.

    Joseph G. Christenbury;Francisco A. Folgar;Rachelle V. O'Connell;Stephanie J. Chiu

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph A. Izatt
Joseph A. Izatt Duke University
Sina Farsiu
Sina Farsiu Duke University
Glenn J. Jaffe
Glenn J. Jaffe Duke University
Maureen G. Maguire
Maureen G. Maguire University of Pennsylvania
Emily Y. Chew
Emily Y. Chew National Institutes of Health
Frederick L. Ferris
Frederick L. Ferris National Institutes of Health
Stephen A. Boppart
Stephen A. Boppart University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Susan B. Bressler
Susan B. Bressler Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Leonard M. Hjelmeland
Leonard M. Hjelmeland University of California, Davis
Stuart L. Fine
Stuart L. Fine University of Colorado Denver

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine is just one of many rewarding options within the healthcare field. For those seeking alternative entry points or complementary skills, a variety of online programs are available.

Entry-level roles such as medical billing and coding offer fast tracks into healthcare. If cost is a concern, consider financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes, which can help reduce tuition expenses while preparing you for a vital administrative role.

For students interested in nursing but concerned about challenging screenings, there are lpn program no entrance exam options, letting you start your practical nursing journey without the added pressure of entrance tests.

Those looking for leadership roles in the healthcare sector should explore a healthcare administration degree online accredited program, offering flexibility and advancing your credentials in management.

Registered nurses aiming to become nurse practitioners can benefit from specialized pathways like rn to np bridge programs, streamlining your education and expanding your career opportunities.

Each of these related degrees and programs opens new doors in the healthcare industry, suited for diverse interests, schedules, and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Cynthia A. Toth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles