World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
26772
World Ranking
18308
National Ranking
9137

Stuart L. Fine publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart L. Fine sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 234 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stuart L. Fine D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart L. Fine sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stuart L. Fine is affiliated with the University of Colorado Denver in the United States and specializes primarily in the field of computer science. Their research exhibits a focus on artificial intelligence, with significant contributions to several subfields including computer vision and pattern recognition, clinical psychology, social psychology, and emergency medicine.

Their scholarly output concentrates notably on domain adaptation and few-shot learning, areas within artificial intelligence where they have produced multiple publications. Alongside these technical topics, Fine's research also addresses aspects of mental health, evident in work related to suicide and self-harm studies, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, mental health treatment and access, hospital admissions and outcomes, cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes, as well as healthcare operations and scheduling optimization.

Fine has collaborated frequently with several coauthors throughout their career. These frequent collaborators include Shira Barzilay, Anat Brunstein Klomek, Lior Carmi, Mishael Zohar, and Talia Friedman, each appearing as coauthors in multiple publications.

Prominent venues for Fine's research publications include:

  • Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • 2021 20th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)
  • JMIR Research Protocols
  • Israel Journal of Health Policy Research
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Among recent publications are:

  • "Real-Time Real-World Digital Monitoring of Adolescent Suicide Risk During the Six Months Following Emergency Department Discharge: Protocol for an Intensive Longitudinal Study" (2023, JMIR Research Protocols)
  • "When policy meets reality: the new 18-hour on-call shift policy and the Israeli anesthesia workforce crisis" (2023, Israel Journal of Health Policy Research)
  • "Bring me my Meal on your Wheel - An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Food Delivery Platforms on Local Restaurant Employment" (2023, Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences)
  • "Margin-Based Regularization and Selective Sampling in Deep Neural Networks" (2020, arXiv)
  • "Predicting Adolescent Suicide Risk From Cellphone Usage Data and Self-Report Assessments" (2024, Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences)

Best Publications

  • Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

    Daniel F Martin;Maureen G Maguire;Gui-shuang Ying

  • Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: two-year results.

    Daniel F. Martin;Maureen G. Maguire;Stuart L. Fine;Gui Shuang Ying

  • Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Blindness due to Neovascular Maculopathy

    Frederick L. Ferris;Stuart L. Fine;Leslie Hyman

  • The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma, III: initial mortality findings. COMS Report No. 18.

    M Diener-West;J D Earle;S L Fine;B S Hawkins

  • Senile macular degeneration: a case-control study.

    Leslie G. Hyman;Abraham M. Lilienfeld;Frederick L. Ferris;Stuart L. Fine

  • Photocoagulation Treatment of Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: The Second Report of Diabetic Retinopathy Study Findings

    Arnall Patz;Stuart Fine;Daniel Finkelstein;Thaddeus Prout

  • Five-Year Outcomes with Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials

    Maureen G. Maguire;Daniel F. Martin;Gui shuang Ying;Glenn J. Jaffe

  • Risk of geographic atrophy in the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials.

    Juan E. Grunwald;Ebenezer Daniel;Jiayan Huang;Gui Shuang Ying

  • Aspirin Effects on Mortality and Morbidity in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report 14

    Aaron Kassoff;Sheldon M. Buzney;J. Wallace McMeel;John J. Weiter

  • Relationship of Drusen and Abnormalities of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium to the Prognosis of Neovascular Macular Degeneration

    Susan B. Bressler;Maureen G. Maguire;Neil M. Bressler;Stuart L. Fine

  • Frequency of Adverse Systemic Reactions after Fluorescein Angiography: Results of a Prospective Study

    Kris A. Kwiterovich;Maureen G. Maguire;Robert P. Murphy;Andrew P. Schachat

  • Long-term follow-up of central serous chorioretinopathy.

    C. M. Gilbert;S. L. Owens;P. D. Smith;S. L. Fine

  • Foveolar choroidal blood flow in age-related macular degeneration.

    J E Grunwald;S M Hariprasad;J DuPont;M G Maguire

  • Risk factors for choroidal neovascularization in the second eye of patients with juxtafoveal or subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration

    Maureen G. Maguire;Susan B. Bressler;Neil M. Bresskr;Judith Alexander

  • Krypton Laser photocoagulation for neovascular lesions of Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Results of a randomized clinical trial

    T. A. Meredith;P. Sternberg;J. M. Brown;R. P. Murphy

  • Exposure to sunlight and other risk factors for age-related macular degeneration.

    Sheila K. West;Frank S. Rosenthal;Neil M. Bressler;Susan B. Bressler

  • Natural course of choroidal neovascular membranes within the foveal avascular zone in senile macular degeneration.

    Susan B. Bressler;Neil M. Bressler;Stuart L. Fine;Argye Hillis

  • The grading and prevalence of macular degeneration in Chesapeake Bay watermen.

    Neil M. Bressler;Susan B. Bressler;Sheila K. West;Stuart L. Fine

  • Clinicopathologic correlation of drusen and retinal pigment epithelial abnormalities in age-related macular degeneration.

    Neil M Bressler;Juan C Silva;Susan B Bressler;Stuart L Fine

  • Risk of Scar in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials

    Ebenezer Daniel;Cynthia A. Toth;Juan E. Grunwald;Glenn J. Jaffe

Frequent Co-Authors

Maureen G. Maguire
Maureen G. Maguire University of Pennsylvania
Susan B. Bressler
Susan B. Bressler Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Neil M. Bressler
Neil M. Bressler Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Frederick L. Ferris
Frederick L. Ferris National Institutes of Health
Glenn J. Jaffe
Glenn J. Jaffe Duke University
Cynthia A. Toth
Cynthia A. Toth Duke University
W. Richard Green
W. Richard Green Johns Hopkins University
Argye E. Hillis
Argye E. Hillis Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Neil R. Miller
Neil R. Miller Johns Hopkins University
William E. Smiddy
William E. Smiddy University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career pathways beyond traditional medical school is increasingly popular among students wanting to work in healthcare. Many students consider alternative options, such as direct entry msn online programs, which allow individuals with non-nursing backgrounds to quickly transition into advanced nursing roles.

For those seeking more accessible entry points into the medical field, there are nursing programs with high acceptance rates that provide a path into nursing for candidates who may not meet the competitive requirements of some institutions.

Not everyone wants to be a clinician—some may prefer administrative roles. If you’re interested in healthcare administration, you can find medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid, making this career both accessible and affordable.

It’s also worth noting that entrance exams can sometimes be a hurdle. However, do all nursing schools require the teas? The answer is no—some reputable nursing schools do not require the TEAS or HESI, lowering entry barriers for prospective students.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart L. Fine

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles