World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8892 8303 389 375 65 5907

Peter Putman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Putman between 1998 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Putman published across 23 years, from 1998 to 2020, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2010. 5 of the 66 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2010. 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication
1998 2020

66 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Putman: publications per year, 1998 to 2020
Year Publications
1998 2
1999 0
2000 0
2001 3
2002 1
2003 4
2004 4
2005 0
2006 4
2007 4
2008 0
2009 2
2010 6
2011 4
2012 4
2013 4
2014 6
2015 3
2016 4
2017 0
2018 6
2019 4
2020 1
Total 66
Download as CSV

Peter Putman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Putman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 65 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 65
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Putman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Putman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 38
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Putman is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a specific emphasis on cognitive neuroscience. The core areas of their investigations include neural and behavioral psychology studies, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, as well as neural dynamics and brain function.

Recent publications have contributed to the field of applied psychophysiology. Notably, one documented paper is titled EEG Theta/Beta Ratio Neurofeedback Training in Healthy Females, published in 2020 in the journal Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.

Peter Putman has collaborated with several researchers frequently. Coauthors include Dana Van Son, Willem van der Does, and Guido P. H. Band. These collaborations have contributed to advancing understanding in neurofeedback training and related neurophysiological phenomena.

Their documented research has appeared in Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, indicating a focused contribution to this publication venue within the domain of biosignal research and psychological applications.

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural dynamics and brain function

  • EEG Theta/Beta Ratio Neurofeedback Training in Healthy Females (2020), Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

  • Dana Van Son
  • Willem van der Does
  • Guido P. H. Band

  • Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

Best Publications

  • Testosterone shifts the balance between sensitivity for punishment and reward in healthy young women

    Jack van Honk;Dennis J.L.G Schutter;Erno J Hermans;Peter Putman

  • Testosterone administration reduces empathetic behavior: A facial mimicry study

    Erno Jan Hermans;Peter Putman;Jack van Honk

  • A Single Administration of Testosterone Reduces Fear-Potentiated Startle in Humans

    Erno J. Hermans;Peter Putman;Johanna M. Baas;Hans P. Koppeschaar

  • EEG theta/beta ratio as a potential biomarker for attentional control and resilience against deleterious effects of stress on attention

    Peter Putman;Bart Verkuil;Elsa Arias-Garcia;Ioanna Pantazi

  • EEG theta/beta ratio in relation to fear-modulated response-inhibition, attentional control, and affective traits

    Peter Putman;Jacobien van Peer;Ioulia Maimari;Steven van der Werff

  • Emotional stroop performance for masked angry faces: it's BAS, not BIS.

    Peter Putman;Erno Hermans;Jack van Honk

  • Defective somatic markers in sub-clinical psychopathy.

    Jack van Honk;Erno J Hermans;Peter Putman;Barbara Montagne

  • Gaze direction differentially affects avoidance tendencies to happy and angry faces in socially anxious individuals

    Karin Roelofs;Peter Putman;Sonja Schouten;Wolf-Gero Lange

  • Exogenous cortisol acutely influences motivated decision making in healthy young men.

    Peter Putman;Niki Antypa;Panagiota Crysovergi;Willem A. J. van der Does

  • Low cortisol levels and the balance between punishment sensitivity and reward dependency.

    Jack Van Honk;Dennis J. L. G. Schutter;Erno J. Hermans;Peter Putman

  • Exogenous testosterone attenuates the integrated central stress response in healthy young women.

    Erno J. Hermans;Erno J. Hermans;Peter Putman;Johanna M. Baas;Nynke M. Gecks

  • Anxiety meets fear in perception of dynamic expressive gaze.

    Peter Putman;Erno Hermans;Jack van Honk

  • Resting state EEG delta-beta coherence in relation to anxiety, behavioral inhibition, and selective attentional processing of threatening stimuli.

    Peter Putman

  • Frontal EEG theta/beta ratio as an electrophysiological marker for attentional control and its test-retest reliability

    Angelos Angelidis;Willem van der Does;Lemmy Schakel;Peter Putman

  • A single administration of cortisol acutely reduces preconscious attention for fear in anxious young men

    Peter Putman;Peter Putman;Erno J. Hermans;Erno J. Hermans;Hans Koppeschaar;Alexandra van Schijndel

  • Frontal EEG theta/beta ratio during mind wandering episodes.

    Dana van Son;Frances M. De Blasio;Jack S. Fogarty;Angelos Angelidis

  • Effects of single cortisol administrations on human affect reviewed: Coping with stress through adaptive regulation of automatic cognitive processing

    Peter Putman;Karin Roelofs;Karin Roelofs

  • Parietal electroencephalogram beta asymmetry and selective attention to angry facial expressions in healthy human subjects.

    Dennis J.L.G. Schutter;Peter Putman;Erno Hermans;Jack van Honk

  • Selective attention to unmasked and masked threatening words: relationships to trait anger and anxiety

    Jack van Honk;Adriaan Tuiten;Marcel van den Hout;Peter Putman

  • Attentional bias modification in posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized controlled trial.

    Maartje Schoorl;Peter Putman;Willem Van Der Does

  • Attentional control affects the relationship between tonic immobility and intrusive memories.

    Muriel A. Hagenaars;Peter Putman

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack van Honk
Jack van Honk Utrecht University
Erno J. Hermans
Erno J. Hermans Radboud University
Dennis J.L.G. Schutter
Dennis J.L.G. Schutter Utrecht University
Karin Roelofs
Karin Roelofs Radboud University
Albert Postma
Albert Postma Utrecht University
Robert J. Barry
Robert J. Barry University of Wollongong
Nic J.A. van der Wee
Nic J.A. van der Wee Leiden University Medical Center
Julian F. Thayer
Julian F. Thayer University of California, Irvine
Philip Spinhoven
Philip Spinhoven Leiden University
A.J. Willem Van der Does
A.J. Willem Van der Does Leiden University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens up a variety of related online degrees and career opportunities, especially in the fields of counseling, therapy, and social work. Many professionals choose to transition into social work roles, which offer the chance to make a meaningful impact in diverse communities.

Each state has unique educational and licensure requirements. For example, you can review the Iowa social work education requirements to understand necessary coursework and supervised practice hours. Similarly, understanding the Kansas social work license requirements is essential for those looking to practice in that state.

For those interested in further alternatives, check requirements for becoming a social worker in Kentucky or explore the specific Louisiana social work education requirements.

Online programs in psychology or social work provide flexibility for working professionals and can be a stepping-stone to a variety of fulfilling career pathways in the behavioral sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Putman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles