World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 103 546 474 18 16 406 38984
Medicine 103 7364 6919 419 403 399 39184

Oliver T. Wolf publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Oliver T. Wolf between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Oliver T. Wolf published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 16.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2019. 31 of the 504 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2019. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 27 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 30 publications 2026: 1 publication
1996 2026

504 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Oliver T. Wolf: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 3
1998 4
1999 4
2000 3
2001 7
2002 9
2003 6
2004 5
2005 15
2006 13
2007 11
2008 12
2009 22
2010 22
2011 18
2012 22
2013 27
2014 24
2015 27
2016 22
2017 20
2018 17
2019 32
2020 26
2021 25
2022 24
2023 23
2024 29
2025 30
2026 1
Total 504
Download as CSV

Oliver T. Wolf publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver T. Wolf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–410 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 406 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43 406
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Oliver T. Wolf D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver T. Wolf sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48 103
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Psychology and Cognitive Sciences

Overview

Oliver T. Wolf is affiliated with Ruhr University Bochum in Germany and conducts research primarily within the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their work encompasses a broad array of topics, with a particular focus on stress responses, memory mechanisms, and neuroendocrine regulation of behavior.

The main fields of study for this researcher include Neuroscience and Psychology, with notable subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their research covers several key topics, including:

  • Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neuroendocrine Regulation and Behavior
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Memory Processes and Influences
  • Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Oliver T. Wolf has contributed to multiple publications, frequently publishing in journals such as Psychoneuroendocrinology, Scientific Reports, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature, and Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

Selected recent papers include:

  • "Atypical lateralization in neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders: What is the role of stress?" (2020, Cortex)
  • "The effects of a music and singing intervention during pregnancy on maternal well-being and mother-infant bonding: a randomised, controlled study" (2020, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics)
  • "The brain under stress-A systematic review and activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of changes in BOLD signal associated with acute stress exposure" (2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)
  • "The impact of emotion regulation on cardiovascular, neuroendocrine and psychological stress responses" (2020, Biological Psychology)
  • "Stress research during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond" (2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)

Their work includes collaboration with several frequent coauthors, notably:

  • Christian J. Merz
  • Valerie L. Jentsch
  • Sebastian Ocklenburg
  • Lena Sophie Pfeifer
  • Matthias Brand

Oliver T. Wolf received recognition from the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina in 2019 within the domain of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences.

Best Publications

  • Free Cortisol Levels after Awakening: A Reliable Biological Marker for the Assessment of Adrenocortical Activity

    J.C. Pruessner;O.T. Wolf;D.H. Hellhammer;A. Buske-Kirschbaum

  • Stress- and treatment-induced elevations of cortisol levels associated with impaired declarative memory in healthy adults.

    C Kirschbaum;O.T Wolf;M May;W Wippich

  • Dissociation of Cognitive and Emotional Empathy in Adults with Asperger Syndrome Using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET)

    Isabel Dziobek;Kimberley Rogers;Kimberley Rogers;Stefan Fleck;Markus Bahnemann

  • Introducing MASC: a movie for the assessment of social cognition.

    Isabel Dziobek;Stefan Fleck;Elke Kalbe;Kimberley Rogers

  • Impaired Memory Retrieval after Psychosocial Stress in Healthy Young Men

    Sabrina Kuhlmann;Marcel Piel;Oliver T. Wolf

  • Stress effects on memory: an update and integration

    Lars Schwabe;Marian Joëls;Benno Roozendaal;Oliver T. Wolf

  • Prediction of cognitive decline in normal elderly subjects with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose/positron-emission tomography (FDG/PET)

    M. J. De Leon;A. Convit;A. Convit;O. T. Wolf;O. T. Wolf;C. Y. Tarshish

  • Stress Prompts Habit Behavior in Humans

    Lars Schwabe;Oliver T. Wolf

  • Psychosocial stress induces working memory impairments in an n-back paradigm

    Daniela Schoofs;Diana Preuß;Oliver T. Wolf

  • Who cares? Revisiting empathy in asperger syndrome

    Kimberley Rogers;Isabel Dziobek;Jason Hassenstab;Oliver T. Wolf

  • Stress and memory in humans: Twelve years of progress?

    Oliver T. Wolf

  • A meta-analytic review of the effects of acute cortisol administration on human memory

    S. Het;G. Ramlow;O.T. Wolf

  • Salivary alpha amylase as marker for adrenergic activity during stress: effect of betablockade.

    Anda van Stegeren;Nicolas Rohleder;Walter Everaerd;Oliver T. Wolf

  • The relationship between stress induced cortisol levels and memory differs between men and women.

    Oliver T. Wolf;Nicole C. Schommer;Dirk H. Hellhammer;Bruce S. McEwen

  • Neuroendocrine and psychometric evaluation of a placebo version of the ‘Trier Social Stress Test’

    S. Het;N. Rohleder;D. Schoofs;C. Kirschbaum

  • Reduced glucose tolerance is associated with poor memory performance and hippocampal atrophy among normal elderly

    Antonio Convit;Oliver T. Wolf;Chaim Tarshish;Mony J. de Leon

  • Stress and multiple memory systems: from ‘thinking’ to ‘doing’

    Lars Schwabe;Oliver T. Wolf

  • Learning under stress impairs memory formation.

    Lars Schwabe;Oliver T. Wolf

  • True or false? Memory is differentially affected by stress-induced cortisol elevations and sympathetic activity at consolidation and retrieval.

    Tom Smeets;Henry Otgaar;Ingrid Candel;Oliver T. Wolf

  • Effects of a Two-Week Physiological Dehydroepiandrosterone Substitution on Cognitive Performance and Well-Being in Healthy Elderly Women and Men

    Oliver T. Wolf;Oliver Neumann;Dirk H. Hellhammer;Andrea C. Geiben

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian J. Merz
Christian J. Merz Ruhr University Bochum
Antonio Convit
Antonio Convit New York University
Lars Schwabe
Lars Schwabe Universität Hamburg
Katja Wingenfeld
Katja Wingenfeld Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Matthias Brand
Matthias Brand University of Duisburg-Essen
Christian Otte
Christian Otte Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Isabel Dziobek
Isabel Dziobek Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Mony J. de Leon
Mony J. de Leon Cornell University
Rudolf Stark
Rudolf Stark University of Giessen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of online programs and career routes. Many students opt for online bachelor's or master's degrees in psychology, counseling, or social work to balance their studies with life's demands. These flexible programs can serve as stepping stones toward licensure and specialized practice.

Becoming a licensed therapist often requires meeting specific state guidelines, gaining supervised clinical experience, and passing relevant exams. For example, you can explore the Phoenix licensed therapist requirements or review the Pittsburgh licensed therapist requirements if you plan to practice in those regions.

Additionally, requirements and opportunities may differ in other cities. Learn more about becoming a licensed therapist in Plano or explore becoming a licensed therapist in Port St. Lucie to see how local regulations may impact your pathway. Understanding these nuances helps ensure you choose an educational and career route that aligns with your goals and meets state standards.

Best Scientists Citing Oliver T. Wolf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles