World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 73 19602 18396 9757 9001 171 22074

Antonio Convit publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Antonio Convit between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Antonio Convit published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2012. 2 of the 179 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2012. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1987 2025

179 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Antonio Convit: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 6
1989 6
1990 5
1991 6
1992 6
1993 7
1994 5
1995 8
1996 3
1997 7
1998 3
1999 4
2000 6
2001 5
2002 4
2003 2
2004 4
2005 7
2006 3
2007 6
2008 3
2009 6
2010 7
2011 7
2012 11
2013 6
2014 6
2015 3
2016 5
2017 5
2018 5
2019 0
2020 2
2021 3
2022 1
2023 2
2024 0
2025 2
Total 179
Download as CSV

Antonio Convit publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Convit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 171 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155 171
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Antonio Convit D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Convit sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391 73
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Psychiatry
  • Cognition

His scientific interests lie mostly in Hippocampus, Hippocampal formation, Internal medicine, Dementia and Cognition. His research in Hippocampus intersects with topics in Alzheimer's disease, Brain size, Atrophy and Degenerative disease. His Internal medicine study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Endocrinology and Cardiology.

His studies in Cardiology integrate themes in fields like Neocortex, Cognitive decline, Apolipoprotein E, Entorhinal cortex and Cognitive disorder. His Dementia research integrates issues from Neuroscience, Fusiform gyrus and Audiology. His work investigates the relationship between Cognition and topics such as Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus that intersect with problems in Type 2 diabetes, Effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance and Pediatrics.

His most cited work include:

  • Cortisol levels during human aging predict hippocampal atrophy and memory deficits. (1330 citations)
  • Prediction of cognitive decline in normal elderly subjects with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose/positron-emission tomography (FDG/PET) (538 citations)
  • Prediction of cognitive decline in normal elderly subjects with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose/positron-emission tomography (FDG/PET) (538 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of study are Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Insulin resistance, Psychiatry and Diabetes mellitus. His Internal medicine study which covers Cardiology that intersects with Pathology and Retinal. His Endocrinology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Frontal lobe, Effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance and Systemic inflammation.

His Type 2 diabetes study incorporates themes from Cognitive disorder and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. His research integrates issues of Alzheimer's disease, Hippocampus and Coronal plane in his study of Hippocampal formation. The study incorporates disciplines such as Dementia, Anatomy and Brain size in addition to Hippocampus.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Internal medicine (63.59%)
  • Endocrinology (48.54%)
  • Insulin resistance (30.58%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2020)?

  • Internal medicine (63.59%)
  • Insulin resistance (30.58%)
  • Endocrinology (48.54%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Internal medicine, Insulin resistance, Endocrinology, Obesity and Diabetes mellitus. His Internal medicine research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiology. Antonio Convit interconnects Audiology, Neuropsychology, Young adult, Brain Structure and Function and Metabolic syndrome in the investigation of issues within Insulin resistance.

His Audiology research focuses on Neuroscience and how it connects with Parahippocampal gyrus. As part of one scientific family, Antonio Convit deals mainly with the area of Obesity, narrowing it down to issues related to the Clinical psychology, and often Empathy. The concepts of his Dementia study are interwoven with issues in Hippocampal formation, Oncology and Female sex.

Between 2012 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Preliminary evidence of cognitive and brain abnormalities in uncomplicated adolescent obesity (82 citations)
  • Analysis of the MIRIAD Data Shows Sex Differences in Hippocampal Atrophy Progression (55 citations)
  • Analysis of the MIRIAD Data Shows Sex Differences in Hippocampal Atrophy Progression (55 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Psychiatry
  • Cognition

Antonio Convit mainly focuses on Insulin resistance, Internal medicine, Audiology, Gerontology and Neuropsychology. His Insulin resistance study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Cognition and Disease. The Internal medicine study combines topics in areas such as Endocrinology, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Cardiology.

The various areas that Antonio Convit examines in his Audiology study include Neuroscience and Vigilance. His study in Gerontology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Hippocampal formation, Dementia, Oncology and Female sex. Antonio Convit combines subjects such as Developmental psychology, Working memory, Brain Structure and Function and Orbitofrontal cortex with his study of Neuropsychology.

Best Publications

  • Cortisol levels during human aging predict hippocampal atrophy and memory deficits.

    Sonia J. Lupien;Mony de Leon;Susan de Santi;Antonio Convit

  • Dissociation of Cognitive and Emotional Empathy in Adults with Asperger Syndrome Using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET)

    Isabel Dziobek;Kimberley Rogers;Kimberley Rogers;Stefan Fleck;Markus Bahnemann

  • Introducing MASC: a movie for the assessment of social cognition.

    Isabel Dziobek;Stefan Fleck;Elke Kalbe;Kimberley Rogers

  • Prediction of cognitive decline in normal elderly subjects with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose/positron-emission tomography (FDG/PET)

    M. J. De Leon;A. Convit;A. Convit;O. T. Wolf;O. T. Wolf;C. Y. Tarshish

  • Hippocampal formation glucose metabolism and volume losses in MCI and AD.

    Susan De Santi;Mony J de Leon;Mony J de Leon;Henry Rusinek;Antonio Convit;Antonio Convit

  • Who cares? Revisiting empathy in asperger syndrome

    Kimberley Rogers;Isabel Dziobek;Jason Hassenstab;Oliver T. Wolf

  • Hippocampal damage and memory impairments as possible early brain complications of type 2 diabetes

    S. M. Gold;Isabel Dziobek;Victoria Sweat;Aziz Tirsi

  • The histological validation of post mortem magnetic resonance imaging-determined hippocampal volume in Alzheimer's disease.

    Matthew Bobinski;M. J. De Leon;M. J. De Leon;J. Wegiel;S. Desanti

  • Specific Hippocampal Volume Reductions in Individuals at Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease

    A. Convit;A. Convit;M.J. De Leon;M.J. De Leon;C. Tarshish;S. De Santi

  • Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on Cognition and Brain A Selected Review of the Literature

    Kathy F. Yates;Victoria Sweat;Po Lai Yau;Michael M. Turchiano

  • The radiologic prediction of Alzheimer disease: the atrophic hippocampal formation.

    M J de Leon;J Golomb;A E George;A Convit

  • Frequency of hippocampal formation atrophy in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease

    M. J. De Leon;A. E. George;J. Golomb;C. Tarshish

  • Reduced glucose tolerance is associated with poor memory performance and hippocampal atrophy among normal elderly

    Antonio Convit;Oliver T. Wolf;Chaim Tarshish;Mony J. de Leon

  • Reduced hippocampal metabolism in MCI and AD Automated FDG-PET image analysis

    L. Mosconi;W. H. Tsui;S. De Santi;J. Li

  • Atrophy of the medial occipitotemporal, inferior, and middle temporal gyri in non-demented elderly predict decline to Alzheimer's disease.

    A Convit;A Convit;J de Asis;M.J de Leon;M.J de Leon;C.Y Tarshish

  • Disinhibited eating in obese adolescents is associated with orbitofrontal volume reductions and executive dysfunction.

    Lawrence Maayan;Lawrence Maayan;Claire Hoogendoorn;Victoria Sweat;Antonio Convit;Antonio Convit

  • Hippocampal volumes in cognitively normal persons at genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease

    Eric M. Reiman;Anne Uecker;Richard J. Caselli;Stephen Lewis;Stephen Lewis

  • Regional Brain Atrophy Rate Predicts Future Cognitive Decline: 6-year Longitudinal MR Imaging Study of Normal Aging

    Henry Rusinek;Susan De Santi;Dina Frid;Wai-Hon Tsui

  • Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome and Functional and Structural Brain Impairments in Adolescence

    Po Lai Yau;BS Mary Grace Castro;Adrian Tagani;Wai Hon Tsui

  • MRI of entorhinal cortex in mild Alzheimer's disease.

    Matthew Bobinski;Mony J. De Leon;Antonio Convit;Susan De Santi

Frequent Co-Authors

Henry Rusinek
Henry Rusinek New York University
Mony J. de Leon
Mony J. de Leon Cornell University
Oliver T. Wolf
Oliver T. Wolf Ruhr University Bochum
Jan Volavka
Jan Volavka New York University
Isabel Dziobek
Isabel Dziobek Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Steven H. Ferris
Steven H. Ferris New York University
Gene-Jack Wang
Gene-Jack Wang National Institutes of Health
Bruce S. McEwen
Bruce S. McEwen Rockefeller University
Joanna S. Fowler
Joanna S. Fowler Brookhaven National Laboratory
Nora D. Volkow
Nora D. Volkow National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in healthcare careers aside from traditional medical school, there are diverse online degree options to consider. Many choose to pursue nursing as a rewarding alternative, and finding the easiest bsn program to get into can help streamline your entry into this in-demand field.

If you want a medical career that doesn’t require years of advanced study, medical billing and coding is a strong option. There are accessible online programs, some of which offer financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes, making this path more affordable for many students.

Some nursing schools now offer programs that don’t require entrance exams such as the TEAS or HESI. These nursing programs without teas requirements can help reduce application barriers and speed up the enrollment process.

Those interested in leadership roles within the healthcare sector might consider a degree in healthcare administration. Accelerated online programs can help you manage clinics, hospitals, or healthcare organizations—often much sooner than you might expect.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Convit

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles