World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 92 11309 10630 5803 5367 392 31006

Henry Rusinek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Henry Rusinek between 1978 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Henry Rusinek published across 49 years, from 1978 to 2026, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2024. 17 of the 445 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2024. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 6 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 8 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 33 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 1 publication
1978 2026

445 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Henry Rusinek: publications per year, 1978 to 2026
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 6
1990 4
1991 6
1992 4
1993 11
1994 8
1995 8
1996 8
1997 12
1998 7
1999 2
2000 5
2001 7
2002 4
2003 9
2004 11
2005 17
2006 10
2007 11
2008 11
2009 14
2010 9
2011 7
2012 14
2013 14
2014 22
2015 22
2016 20
2017 13
2018 12
2019 15
2020 14
2021 23
2022 17
2023 13
2024 33
2025 16
2026 1
Total 445
Download as CSV

Henry Rusinek publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry Rusinek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 392 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 392
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Henry Rusinek D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henry Rusinek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 92
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Henry Rusinek is a researcher affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their primary field of study is medicine, with a significant focus on radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging. Throughout their career, they have contributed in subfields including neurology, psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, and physiology.

Rusinek's research encompasses a variety of topics that intersect advanced imaging techniques and neurological conditions. Key areas of their work include:

  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Their publication record features research published in several prominent scientific venues. Most frequently, Rusinek's work appears in:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Scientific Reports
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Rusinek are:

  • "Generalizable deep learning model for early Alzheimer's disease detection from structural MRIs" (2022, Scientific Reports)
  • "Decreased CSF clearance and increased brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease" (2022, Fluids and Barriers of the CNS)
  • "Higher CSF sTREM2 attenuates ApoE4-related risk for cognitive decline and neurodegeneration" (2020, Molecular Neurodegeneration)
  • "Visceral adipose tissue in patients with COVID-19: risk stratification for severity" (2020, Abdominal Radiology)
  • "The Brain-Nose Interface: A Potential Cerebrospinal Fluid Clearance Site in Humans" (2022, Frontiers in Physiology)

Collaboration is an important aspect of Rusinek's research efforts. Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Arjun V. Masurkar (28 publications)
  • Lidia Glodzik (23 publications)
  • Mony J. de Leon (22 publications)
  • Tracy Butler (17 publications)
  • Thomas Wısnıewskı (17 publications)

Best Publications

  • Clearance systems in the brain—implications for Alzheimer disease

    Jenna M. Tarasoff-Conway;Roxana O. Carare;Ricardo S. Osorio;Lidia Glodzik

  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis

    Y. Iturria-Medina;R. C. Sotero;P. J. Toussaint;J. M. Mateos-Pérez

  • Hippocampal and entorhinal atrophy in mild cognitive impairment Prediction of Alzheimer disease

    D. P. Devanand;G. Pradhaban;X. Liu;A. Khandji

  • Prediction of cognitive decline in normal elderly subjects with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose/positron-emission tomography (FDG/PET)

    M. J. De Leon;A. Convit;A. Convit;O. T. Wolf;O. T. Wolf;C. Y. Tarshish

  • Hippocampal formation glucose metabolism and volume losses in MCI and AD.

    Susan De Santi;Mony J de Leon;Mony J de Leon;Henry Rusinek;Antonio Convit;Antonio Convit

  • Four distinct trajectories of tau deposition identified in Alzheimer’s disease

    Jacob W Vogel;Alexandra L Young;Neil P Oxtoby;Ruben Smith

  • Protruding aortic atheromas predict stroke in elderly patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: experience with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography.

    Edward S. Katz;Paul A. Tunick;Henry Rusinek;Greg Ribakove

  • The histological validation of post mortem magnetic resonance imaging-determined hippocampal volume in Alzheimer's disease.

    Matthew Bobinski;M. J. De Leon;M. J. De Leon;J. Wegiel;S. Desanti

  • Specific Hippocampal Volume Reductions in Individuals at Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease

    A. Convit;A. Convit;M.J. De Leon;M.J. De Leon;C. Tarshish;S. De Santi

  • Spread of pathological tau proteins through communicating neurons in human Alzheimer's disease

    Jacob W. Vogel;Yasser Iturria-Medina;Olof T. Strandberg;Ruben Smith

  • Perfusion imaging of the liver: current challenges and future goals.

    Pari V. Pandharipande;Glenn A. Krinsky;Henry Rusinek;Vivian S. Lee

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity in a verbal fluency task

    R. Schlösser;M. Hutchinson;S. Joseffer;H. Rusinek

  • Frequency of hippocampal formation atrophy in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease

    M. J. De Leon;A. E. George;J. Golomb;C. Tarshish

  • Diagnosis of cirrhosis with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone and in combination: preliminary experience.

    Jignesh Patel;Eric E. Sigmund;Henry Rusinek;Marcel Oei

  • Reduced hippocampal metabolism in MCI and AD Automated FDG-PET image analysis

    L. Mosconi;W. H. Tsui;S. De Santi;J. Li

  • Atrophy of the medial occipitotemporal, inferior, and middle temporal gyri in non-demented elderly predict decline to Alzheimer's disease.

    A Convit;A Convit;J de Asis;M.J de Leon;M.J de Leon;C.Y Tarshish

  • Volumetric measure of the frontal and temporal lobe regions in schizophrenia: relationship to negative symptoms.

    Michael Sanfilipo;Todd Lafargue;Henry Rusinek;Luigi Arena

  • Hippocampal hypometabolism predicts cognitive decline from normal aging.

    Lisa Mosconi;Susan De Santi;Juan Li;Wai Hon Tsui;Wai Hon Tsui

  • Regional Brain Atrophy Rate Predicts Future Cognitive Decline: 6-year Longitudinal MR Imaging Study of Normal Aging

    Henry Rusinek;Susan De Santi;Dina Frid;Wai-Hon Tsui

  • Pulmonary nodule detection: low-dose versus conventional CT.

    H Rusinek;D P Naidich;G McGuinness;B S Leitman

Frequent Co-Authors

Mony J. de Leon
Mony J. de Leon Cornell University
Vivian S. Lee
Vivian S. Lee University of Utah
Antonio Convit
Antonio Convit New York University
Lidia Glodzik
Lidia Glodzik Cornell University
Yi Li
Yi Li University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James S. Babb
James S. Babb New York University
Samir S. Taneja
Samir S. Taneja New York University
David P. Naidich
David P. Naidich New York University
Sandra E. Black
Sandra E. Black University of Toronto
Reisa A. Sperling
Reisa A. Sperling Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn't always mean becoming a physician. There are flexible, in-demand options for those interested in health sciences, patient care, or health management.

For experienced nurses aiming to advance their careers with minimal on-site training, online dnp programs without clinicals offer an attractive path to achieve the prestigious Doctor of Nursing Practice degree. Those seeking a quicker entry into nursing can explore what is the fastest way to become an lpn to begin working directly with patients after a short, focused program.

Mental health careers are also growing rapidly. If you want to specialize in psychiatric nursing, online pmhnp programs help registered nurses become Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners, offering direct care and support in this high-demand field.

For those interested in the business side of healthcare, an online health management degree opens doors to roles in healthcare administration and leadership. These online options offer flexibility, affordability, and diverse opportunities for anyone considering a rewarding career in the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Henry Rusinek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles