World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
17256
World Ranking
4275
National Ranking
1933

Lidia Glodzik publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lidia Glodzik sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 180 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Lidia Glodzik D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lidia Glodzik sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lidia Glodzik is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with a particular focus on physiology, neurology, psychiatry and mental health, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The primary research topics addressed by Lidia Glodzik encompass dementia and cognitive impairment research, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus, traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, and blood pressure and hypertension studies.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Glodzik include:

  • Decreased CSF clearance and increased brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease, 2022, Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
  • Higher CSF sTREM2 attenuates ApoE4-related risk for cognitive decline and neurodegeneration, 2020, Molecular Neurodegeneration
  • Incomplete circle of Willis variants and stroke outcome, 2022, European Journal of Radiology
  • Quantifying cerebrospinal fluid dynamics: A review of human neuroimaging contributions to CSF physiology and neurodegenerative disease, 2022, Neurobiology of Disease
  • Periodontal dysbiosis associates with reduced CSF Aβ42 in cognitively normal elderly, 2021, Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring

Glodzik frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Mony J. de Leon, Tracy Butler, Henry Rusinek, Emily Tanzi, and Gloria Chiang.

The majority of Glodzik's publications appear in specific venues that regularly publish work in overlapping fields:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Hypertension
  • Scientific Reports
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

    Frank Jessen;Frank Jessen;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Martin van Boxtel;Monique Breteler

  • Clearance systems in the brain—implications for Alzheimer disease

    Jenna M. Tarasoff-Conway;Roxana O. Carare;Ricardo S. Osorio;Lidia Glodzik

  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis

    Y. Iturria-Medina;R. C. Sotero;P. J. Toussaint;J. M. Mateos-Pérez

  • Four distinct trajectories of tau deposition identified in Alzheimer’s disease

    Jacob W Vogel;Alexandra L Young;Neil P Oxtoby;Ruben Smith

  • FDG-PET changes in brain glucose metabolism from normal cognition to pathologically verified Alzheimer's disease

    Lisa Mosconi;Rachel Mistur;Remigiusz Switalski;Wai Hon Tsui;Wai Hon Tsui

  • Spread of pathological tau proteins through communicating neurons in human Alzheimer's disease

    Jacob W. Vogel;Yasser Iturria-Medina;Olof T. Strandberg;Ruben Smith

  • Sleep-disordered breathing advances cognitive decline in the elderly

    Ricardo S. Osorio;Tyler Gumb;Elizabeth Pirraglia;Andrew W. Varga

  • Functional brain architecture is associated with the rate of tau accumulation in Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers for neurodegenerative dementias: An update of the Consensus of the Task Force on Biological Markers in Psychiatry of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry

    Piotr Lewczuk;Peter Riederer;Sid E. O’Bryant;Marcel M. Verbeek

  • Pre-clinical detection of Alzheimer's disease using FDG-PET, with or without amyloid imaging.

    Lisa Mosconi;Valentina Berti;Valentina Berti;Lidia Glodzik;Alberto Pupi

  • Basal forebrain degeneration precedes and predicts the cortical spread of Alzheimer's pathology.

    Taylor W. Schmitz;R. Nathan Spreng;Michael W. Weiner;Paul Aisen

  • TNF-α and antibodies to periodontal bacteria discriminate between Alzheimer's disease patients and normal subjects

    Angela R. Kamer;Ronald G. Craig;Elizabeth Pirraglia;Ananda P. Dasanayake

  • Ferritin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid predict Alzheimer's disease outcomes and are regulated by APOE

    Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

  • Periodontal disease associates with higher brain amyloid load in normal elderly

    Angela R. Kamer;Elizabeth Pirraglia;Wai Tsui;Henry Rusinek

  • Maternal family history of Alzheimer's disease predisposes to reduced brain glucose metabolism

    Lisa Mosconi;Miroslaw Brys;Remigiusz Switalski;Rachel Mistur

  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity Affects Amyloid Burden in Cognitively Normal Elderly. A Longitudinal Study

    Ram A Sharma;Andrew W Varga;Omonigho M Bubu;Elizabeth Pirraglia

  • Cerebrospinal Fluid Clearance in Alzheimer Disease Measured with Dynamic PET.

    Mony J. de Leon;Yi Li;Nobuyuki Okamura;Wai H. Tsui

  • Greater risk of Alzheimer's disease in older adults with insomnia.

    Ricardo S. Osorio;Ricardo S. Osorio;Elizabeth Pirraglia;Luis F. Agüera-Ortiz;Emmanuel H. During

  • Declining brain glucose metabolism in normal individuals with a maternal history of Alzheimer disease.

    L. Mosconi;R. Mistur;R. Switalski;M. Brys

  • Reduced Slow-Wave Sleep Is Associated with High Cerebrospinal Fluid Aβ42 Levels in Cognitively Normal Elderly.

    Andrew W Varga;Margaret E Wohlleber;Sandra Giménez;Sergio Romero;Sergio Romero

  • Cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide in Alzheimer's disease.

    Lidia Glodzik;Catherine Randall;Henry Rusinek;Mony J. de Leon

Frequent Co-Authors

Mony J. de Leon
Mony J. de Leon Cornell University
Yi Li
Yi Li University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Henry Rusinek
Henry Rusinek New York University
Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg
Henrik Zetterberg
Henrik Zetterberg University of Gothenburg
John D. Murray
John D. Murray Yale University
Reisa A. Sperling
Reisa A. Sperling Brigham and Women's Hospital
Andrew J. Saykin
Andrew J. Saykin Indiana University
Marilyn S. Albert
Marilyn S. Albert Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Sandra E. Black
Sandra E. Black University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your education in neuroscience can open the door to a variety of career pathways, including roles in counseling, mental health, and psychological research. Many students interested in these fields choose to complement their neuroscience studies with advanced online programs that build clinical and research skills.

For those seeking licensure in counseling, enrolling in cacrep accredited programs is essential to ensure quality and professional standards. Prospective counselors can also benefit from exploring affordable online masters counseling programs, which provide flexible and cost-effective routes to developing essential counseling skills.

Individuals aiming for roles in family or couples therapy may consider an online masters mft, which focuses on marriage and family therapy principles. Additionally, broadening your expertise through a psychology masters online can further enhance your knowledge base and expand your career options in mental health, research, or education.

These online pathways offer accessibility and affordability, helping you pursue specialized roles complementary to neuroscience, all from the convenience of your home.

Best Scientists Citing Lidia Glodzik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles