World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 57 4275 3923 1933 1743 180 17256

Lidia Glodzik publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lidia Glodzik between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lidia Glodzik published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2021. 28 of the 181 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2021. 2007: 2 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 12 publications
2007 2025

181 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lidia Glodzik: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 2
2008 6
2009 7
2010 7
2011 12
2012 13
2013 7
2014 12
2015 12
2016 12
2017 6
2018 6
2019 10
2020 9
2021 16
2022 11
2023 5
2024 16
2025 12
Total 181
Download as CSV

Lidia Glodzik publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lidia Glodzik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 180 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350 180
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Lidia Glodzik D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lidia Glodzik sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357 57
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Lidia Glodzik is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with a particular focus on physiology, neurology, psychiatry and mental health, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The primary research topics addressed by Lidia Glodzik encompass dementia and cognitive impairment research, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus, traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration mechanisms, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, and blood pressure and hypertension studies.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Glodzik include:

  • Decreased CSF clearance and increased brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease, 2022, Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
  • Higher CSF sTREM2 attenuates ApoE4-related risk for cognitive decline and neurodegeneration, 2020, Molecular Neurodegeneration
  • Incomplete circle of Willis variants and stroke outcome, 2022, European Journal of Radiology
  • Quantifying cerebrospinal fluid dynamics: A review of human neuroimaging contributions to CSF physiology and neurodegenerative disease, 2022, Neurobiology of Disease
  • Periodontal dysbiosis associates with reduced CSF Aβ42 in cognitively normal elderly, 2021, Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring

Glodzik frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Mony J. de Leon, Tracy Butler, Henry Rusinek, Emily Tanzi, and Gloria Chiang.

The majority of Glodzik's publications appear in specific venues that regularly publish work in overlapping fields:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Hypertension
  • Scientific Reports
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease

    Frank Jessen;Frank Jessen;Rebecca E. Amariglio;Martin van Boxtel;Monique Breteler

  • Clearance systems in the brain—implications for Alzheimer disease

    Jenna M. Tarasoff-Conway;Roxana O. Carare;Ricardo S. Osorio;Lidia Glodzik

  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis

    Y. Iturria-Medina;R. C. Sotero;P. J. Toussaint;J. M. Mateos-Pérez

  • Four distinct trajectories of tau deposition identified in Alzheimer’s disease

    Jacob W Vogel;Alexandra L Young;Neil P Oxtoby;Ruben Smith

  • FDG-PET changes in brain glucose metabolism from normal cognition to pathologically verified Alzheimer's disease

    Lisa Mosconi;Rachel Mistur;Remigiusz Switalski;Wai Hon Tsui;Wai Hon Tsui

  • Spread of pathological tau proteins through communicating neurons in human Alzheimer's disease

    Jacob W. Vogel;Yasser Iturria-Medina;Olof T. Strandberg;Ruben Smith

  • Sleep-disordered breathing advances cognitive decline in the elderly

    Ricardo S. Osorio;Tyler Gumb;Elizabeth Pirraglia;Andrew W. Varga

  • Functional brain architecture is associated with the rate of tau accumulation in Alzheimer’s disease

    Unknown

  • Cerebrospinal fluid and blood biomarkers for neurodegenerative dementias: An update of the Consensus of the Task Force on Biological Markers in Psychiatry of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry

    Piotr Lewczuk;Peter Riederer;Sid E. O’Bryant;Marcel M. Verbeek

  • Pre-clinical detection of Alzheimer's disease using FDG-PET, with or without amyloid imaging.

    Lisa Mosconi;Valentina Berti;Valentina Berti;Lidia Glodzik;Alberto Pupi

  • Basal forebrain degeneration precedes and predicts the cortical spread of Alzheimer's pathology.

    Taylor W. Schmitz;R. Nathan Spreng;Michael W. Weiner;Paul Aisen

  • TNF-α and antibodies to periodontal bacteria discriminate between Alzheimer's disease patients and normal subjects

    Angela R. Kamer;Ronald G. Craig;Elizabeth Pirraglia;Ananda P. Dasanayake

  • Ferritin levels in the cerebrospinal fluid predict Alzheimer's disease outcomes and are regulated by APOE

    Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

  • Periodontal disease associates with higher brain amyloid load in normal elderly

    Angela R. Kamer;Elizabeth Pirraglia;Wai Tsui;Henry Rusinek

  • Maternal family history of Alzheimer's disease predisposes to reduced brain glucose metabolism

    Lisa Mosconi;Miroslaw Brys;Remigiusz Switalski;Rachel Mistur

  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity Affects Amyloid Burden in Cognitively Normal Elderly. A Longitudinal Study

    Ram A Sharma;Andrew W Varga;Omonigho M Bubu;Elizabeth Pirraglia

  • Cerebrospinal Fluid Clearance in Alzheimer Disease Measured with Dynamic PET.

    Mony J. de Leon;Yi Li;Nobuyuki Okamura;Wai H. Tsui

  • Greater risk of Alzheimer's disease in older adults with insomnia.

    Ricardo S. Osorio;Ricardo S. Osorio;Elizabeth Pirraglia;Luis F. Agüera-Ortiz;Emmanuel H. During

  • Declining brain glucose metabolism in normal individuals with a maternal history of Alzheimer disease.

    L. Mosconi;R. Mistur;R. Switalski;M. Brys

  • Reduced Slow-Wave Sleep Is Associated with High Cerebrospinal Fluid Aβ42 Levels in Cognitively Normal Elderly.

    Andrew W Varga;Margaret E Wohlleber;Sandra Giménez;Sergio Romero;Sergio Romero

  • Cerebrovascular reactivity to carbon dioxide in Alzheimer's disease.

    Lidia Glodzik;Catherine Randall;Henry Rusinek;Mony J. de Leon

Frequent Co-Authors

Mony J. de Leon
Mony J. de Leon Cornell University
Yi Li
Yi Li University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Henry Rusinek
Henry Rusinek New York University
Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg
Henrik Zetterberg
Henrik Zetterberg University of Gothenburg
John D. Murray
John D. Murray Yale University
Reisa A. Sperling
Reisa A. Sperling Brigham and Women's Hospital
Andrew J. Saykin
Andrew J. Saykin Indiana University
Marilyn S. Albert
Marilyn S. Albert Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Sandra E. Black
Sandra E. Black University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your education in neuroscience can open the door to a variety of career pathways, including roles in counseling, mental health, and psychological research. Many students interested in these fields choose to complement their neuroscience studies with advanced online programs that build clinical and research skills.

For those seeking licensure in counseling, enrolling in cacrep accredited programs is essential to ensure quality and professional standards. Prospective counselors can also benefit from exploring affordable online masters counseling programs, which provide flexible and cost-effective routes to developing essential counseling skills.

Individuals aiming for roles in family or couples therapy may consider an online masters mft, which focuses on marriage and family therapy principles. Additionally, broadening your expertise through a psychology masters online can further enhance your knowledge base and expand your career options in mental health, research, or education.

These online pathways offer accessibility and affordability, helping you pursue specialized roles complementary to neuroscience, all from the convenience of your home.

Best Scientists Citing Lidia Glodzik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles