World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
43035
World Ranking
11994
National Ranking
6149

David P. Naidich publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Naidich sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 311 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David P. Naidich D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David P. Naidich sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David P. Naidich is affiliated with New York University in the United States and has a focused research career in the field of Medicine with 52 publications. Their work primarily concentrates on the subfields of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Otorhinolaryngology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, and Physiology.

Naidich's research covers several key topics, including:

  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
  • Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Ultrasound in Clinical Applications

Their recent publications illustrate a strong focus on thoracic imaging, lung diseases, and COVID-19 related chest imaging, with notable papers such as:

  • Fleischner Society: Glossary of Terms for Thoracic Imaging, 2024, Radiology
  • Management of Lung Nodules and Lung Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020, CHEST Journal
  • The Usefulness of Chest CT Imaging in Patients With Suspected or Diagnosed COVID-19, 2021, CHEST Journal
  • Algorithmic Approach to the Diagnosis of Organizing Pneumonia, 2022, CHEST Journal
  • Managing Incidental Findings on Thoracic CT: Lung Findings. A White Paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee, 2021, Journal of the American College of Radiology

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Suhail Raoof
  • Claudia I. Henschke
  • Rowena Yip
  • David F. Yankelevitz
  • Javier J. Zulueta

David P. Naidich has contributed to leading medical journals, predominantly publishing in the CHEST Journal and Radiology, followed by the Journal of the American College of Radiology. Other venues include Radiology Imaging Cancer and Clinical Imaging.

Best Publications

  • Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening

    Claudia I Henschke;Dorothy I McCauley;David F Yankelevitz;David P Naidich

  • Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017

    Heber MacMahon;David P. Naidich;Jin Mo Goo;Kyung Soo Lee

  • End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography

    Diego Ardila;Atilla Peter Kiraly;Sujeeth Bharadwaj;Bokyung Choi

  • Guidelines for Management of Small Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Scans: A Statement from the Fleischner Society

    Heber MacMahon;John H. M. Austin;Gordon Gamsu;Christian J. Herold

  • Evaluation of Individuals With Pulmonary Nodules: When Is It Lung Cancer?: Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Michael K. Gould;Jessica Donington;William R. Lynch;Peter J. Mazzone

  • The national lung screening trial: Overview and study design

    Constantine A. Gatsonis;Denise R. Aberle;Christine D. Berg;William C. Black

  • Lung nodule enhancement at CT: multicenter study.

    Stephen J. Swensen;Robert W. Viggiano;David E. Midthun;Nestor L. Müller

  • Recommendations for the Management of Subsolid Pulmonary Nodules Detected at CT: A Statement from the Fleischner Society

    David P. Naidich;Alexander A. Bankier;Heber MacMahon;Cornelia M. Schaefer-Prokop

  • Glossary of terms for CT of the lungs: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society.

    J. H. M. Austin;N. L. Müller;P. J. Friedman;D. M. Hansell

  • High-Resolution CT of the Lung

    W. Richard Webb;Nestor Luiz Müller;David P. Naidich

  • Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT.

    E.J. Balthazar;J.H.C. Ranson;D.P. Naidich;A.J. Megibow

  • Cystic fibrosis: scoring system with thin-section CT.

    M Bhalla;N Turcios;V Aponte;M Jenkins

  • Low-dose CT of the lungs: Preliminary observations

    D P Naidich;C H Marshall;C Gribbin;R S Arams

  • The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Coding T Categories for Subsolid Nodules and Assessment of Tumor Size in Part-Solid Tumors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer

    William D. Travis;Hisao Asamura;Alexander A. Bankier;Mary Beth Beasley

  • Early lung cancer action project: initial findings on repeat screenings.

    Claudia I. Henschke;David P. Naidich;David F. Yankelevitz;Georgeann McGuinness

  • Evaluation of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer?: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition).

    Michael K. Gould;Michael K. Gould;James Fletcher;Mark D. Iannettoni;William R. Lynch

  • Computed tomography of bronchiectasis.

    David P. Naidich;David P. Naidich;Dorothy I. McCauley;Dorothy I. McCauley;Nagi F. Khouri;Frederick P. Stitik

  • CT of the pulmonary nodule: a cooperative study.

    E A Zerhouni;F P Stitik;S S Siegelman;D P Naidich

  • Screening for lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

    Frank C. Detterbeck;Peter J. Mazzone;David P. Naidich;Peter B. Bach

  • CT Screening for Lung Cancer: Suspiciousness of Nodules according to Size on Baseline Scans

    Claudia I. Henschke;David F. Yankelevitz;David P. Naidich;Dorothy I. McCauley

Frequent Co-Authors

Alec J. Megibow
Alec J. Megibow New York University
Stanley S. Siegelman
Stanley S. Siegelman Johns Hopkins University
William N. Rom
William N. Rom New York University
Heber MacMahon
Heber MacMahon University of Chicago
Henry Rusinek
Henry Rusinek New York University
Harvey I. Pass
Harvey I. Pass New York University
William D. Travis
William D. Travis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Claudia I. Henschke
Claudia I. Henschke Cornell University
Frank C. Detterbeck
Frank C. Detterbeck Yale University
David F. Yankelevitz
David F. Yankelevitz Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in health sciences or expanding their career options, online degrees offer flexible pathways into the medical field. Today’s digital programs cater to a range of interests and schedules, making it possible to start or advance your healthcare career from anywhere.

Nutrition science is a growing field that complements many medical careers. Pursuing an online nutritionist degree can prepare you for roles in clinical, community, or holistic health settings. If you aim for healthcare administration, consider cahme-accredited online mha programs to develop leadership and management skills key to running hospitals or health organizations.

Registered nurses seeking advancement can enroll in online rn to bsn programs no clinicals, which streamline the process for working professionals by eliminating on-site clinical requirements. For nurses ready for the highest clinical practice level, the shortest online dnp program options allow completion in less time, helping you quickly step into advanced practice or leadership roles.

Each online health degree pathway holds unique benefits and requirements. Exploring these options can help you discover new, flexible routes to achieve your medical career goals in the United States.

Best Scientists Citing David P. Naidich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles