World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
108
Citations
49616
World Ranking
5943
National Ranking
224

Matthijs Oudkerk publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthijs Oudkerk sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 722 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Matthijs Oudkerk D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthijs Oudkerk sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthijs Oudkerk is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, and Surgery.

The main topics addressed in Oudkerk's work include:

  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Oudkerk's recent publications illustrate a range of interests centered on lung cancer screening, diagnostic imaging, and COVID-19 complications. Selected papers include:

  • "Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial" (2020), published in the New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Lung cancer LDCT screening and mortality reduction - evidence, pitfalls and future perspectives" (2020), published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
  • "Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Thromboembolic Complications in COVID-19: Report of the National Institute for Public Health of the Netherlands" (2020), published in Radiology
  • "Lung cancer prediction by Deep Learning to identify benign lung nodules" (2021), published in Lung Cancer
  • "Low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: Clinical evidence and implementation research" (2022), published in the Journal of Internal Medicine

Frequent co-authors in Oudkerk's research include Marjolein A. Heuvelmans, Harry J. de Koning, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Peter M. A. van Ooijen, and Geertruida H. de Bock. These collaborations reflect interdisciplinary and multi-institutional efforts particularly in lung cancer screening and imaging studies.

Publications appear regularly in journals such as the Journal of Thoracic Oncology, European Radiology, European Journal of Cancer, Lung Cancer, and the British Journal of Radiology. These venues demonstrate a strong focus on thoracic oncology and medical imaging.

Best Publications

  • Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial

    Harry J. de Koning;Carlijn M. van der Aalst;Pim A. de Jong;Ernst T. Scholten

  • Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    J. Vansteenkiste;D. De Ruysscher;W.E.E. Eberhardt;E. Lim

  • Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study

    F-E de Leeuw;J C de Groot;E Achten;M Oudkerk

  • Cerebral white matter lesions and cognitive function: the Rotterdam Scan Study.

    Jan Cees De Groot;Frank‐Erik De Leeuw;Matthijs Oudkerk;Jan Van Gijn

  • Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography

    Koen Nieman;Matthijs Oudkerk;Benno Rensing;Peter van Ooijen

  • Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning

    Rob J van Klaveren;Matthijs Oudkerk;Mathias Prokop;Ernst T Scholten

  • Hypertension and cerebral white matter lesions in a prospective cohort study

    FE de Leeuw;FE de Leeuw;FE de Leeuw;de Jan Groot;de Jan Groot;Matthijs Oudkerk;Jcm Witteman

  • Incidence and Risk Factors of Silent Brain Infarcts in the Population-Based Rotterdam Scan Study

    Sarah E. Vermeer;Peter J. Koudstaal;Matthijs Oudkerk;Albert Hofman

  • Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis

    W. J. Heerink;G. H. de Bock;G. J. de Jonge;H. J. M. Groen

  • Coronary Calcification Improves Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in the Elderly

    Rozemarijn Vliegenthart;Matthijs Oudkerk;Albert Hofman;Hok-Hay S. Oei

  • Cerebral white matter lesions and the risk of dementia.

    Niels D. Prins;Ewoud J. van Dijk;Tom den Heijer;Sarah E. Vermeer

  • European position statement on lung cancer screening

    Matthijs Oudkerk;Anand Devaraj;Rozemarijn Vliegenthart;Thomas Henzler

  • Periventricular cerebral white matter lesions predict rate of cognitive decline

    Jan Cees De Groot;Frank-Erik De Leeuw;Frank-Erik De Leeuw;Matthijs Oudkerk;Jan Van Gijn

  • Lung cancer probability in patients with CT-detected pulmonary nodules: a prespecified analysis of data from the NELSON trial of low-dose CT screening

    Nanda Horeweg;Joost van Rosmalen;Marjolein A Heuvelmans;Carlijn M van der Aalst

  • Cerebral white matter lesions and depressive symptoms in elderly adults.

    Jan Cees de Groot;Frank-Erik de Leeuw;Matthijs Oudkerk;Albert Hofman

  • Homocysteine, silent brain infarcts, and white matter lesions: The Rotterdam Scan Study.

    Sarah E. Vermeer;Ewoud J. Van Dijk;Peter J. Koudstaal;Matthijs Oudkerk

  • Risk‐based selection from the general population in a screening trial: Selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch‐Belgian randomised lung cancer multi‐slice CT screening trial (NELSON)

    Carola A. van Iersel;Harry J. de Koning;Gerrit Draisma;Willem P. T. M. Mali

  • The Association Between Blood Pressure, Hypertension, and Cerebral White Matter Lesions Cardiovascular Determinants of Dementia Study

    Ewoud J. van Dijk;Monique M.B. Breteler;Reinhold Schmidt;Klaus Berger

  • Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging

    Matthijs Oudkerk;Arthur E Stillman;Sandra S. Halliburton;Willi A. Kalender

  • Evaluation of Newer Risk Markers for Coronary Heart Disease Risk Classification: A Cohort Study

    Maryam Kavousi;Suzette Elias-Smale;Joost H. W. Rutten;Maarten J. G. Leening

Frequent Co-Authors

Harry J. de Koning
Harry J. de Koning Erasmus University Rotterdam
Albert Hofman
Albert Hofman Harvard University
Harry J.M. Groen
Harry J.M. Groen University Medical Center Groningen
Willem P.Th.M. Mali
Willem P.Th.M. Mali Utrecht University
Jacqueline C.M. Witteman
Jacqueline C.M. Witteman Erasmus University Rotterdam
Mathias Prokop
Mathias Prokop Radboud University
Bram van Ginneken
Bram van Ginneken Radboud University
Monique M.B. Breteler
Monique M.B. Breteler German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Ivana Išgum
Ivana Išgum University of Amsterdam
Pim van der Harst
Pim van der Harst University Medical Center Utrecht

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens the door to a variety of related fields and degree options, especially with the increasing availability of accredited online programs. Many students looking to advance their careers in healthcare can benefit from flexible pathways outside traditional medical school.

Registered nurses (RNs) interested in becoming nurse practitioners can consider adn to fnp programs, which offer efficient bridges to advanced practice. Similarly, those wanting to further their nursing education with added convenience can choose from online rn to bsn programs no clinicals.

Outside of nursing, there’s a growing demand for experts in nutrition. Students can now earn a nutrition bachelor degree online, providing the knowledge to promote wellness and healthy lifestyles.

For those interested in the business side of healthcare, choosing a reputable online master’s program is crucial. Prospective leaders should look for which online healthcare administration programs have cahme accreditation? to ensure their degree meets industry standards.

Best Scientists Citing Matthijs Oudkerk

Trending Scientists