World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
VIEW LIST
Matthijs Oudkerk

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 108 5942 5584 224 219 722 49616

Matthijs Oudkerk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthijs Oudkerk between 1981 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthijs Oudkerk published across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026, averaging 17.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2015. 21 of the 787 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2015. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 14 publications 2000: 26 publications 2001: 25 publications 2002: 27 publications 2003: 23 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 31 publications 2006: 28 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 36 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 34 publications 2013: 41 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 42 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 37 publications 2018: 32 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 38 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 20 publications 2026: 1 publication
1981 2026

787 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthijs Oudkerk: publications per year, 1981 to 2026
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 0
1983 2
1984 2
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 2
1991 1
1992 4
1993 2
1994 7
1995 7
1996 8
1997 8
1998 12
1999 14
2000 26
2001 25
2002 27
2003 23
2004 24
2005 31
2006 28
2007 23
2008 36
2009 32
2010 23
2011 23
2012 34
2013 41
2014 18
2015 42
2016 20
2017 37
2018 32
2019 30
2020 38
2021 24
2022 17
2023 23
2024 17
2025 20
2026 1
Total 787
Download as CSV

Matthijs Oudkerk publications per year - data summary

  • Matthijs Oudkerk, a Medicine scholar from University of Groningen, has 787 publications recorded across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1981 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2015, with 42 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1981, 1985, 1988, 1991 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 4 of the 46 years in the span carry no publications at all (1982, 1986, 1987 and 1989).
  • The rate of publication averages 17.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 18.7 per year counting only the 42 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 78 publications, 10% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1981-1996: 38 publications (2.4 per year); 1997-2012: 389 publications (24.3 per year); 2013-2026: 360 publications (25.7 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Matthijs Oudkerk publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthijs Oudkerk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 721–740 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 722 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259 722
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthijs Oudkerk publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Matthijs Oudkerk, a Medicine scholar from University of Groningen, records 722 publications - the 83rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 83% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Matthijs Oudkerk, and about 17% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Matthijs Oudkerk ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Matthijs Oudkerk D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthijs Oudkerk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 108–109 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 108 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445 108
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Matthijs Oudkerk D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Matthijs Oudkerk, a Medicine scholar from University of Groningen, records 108 D-Index - the 71st percentile of the discipline.
  • 71% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Matthijs Oudkerk, and about 29% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Matthijs Oudkerk ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Matthijs Oudkerk is affiliated with the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, and Surgery.

The main topics addressed in Oudkerk's work include:

  • Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Oudkerk's recent publications illustrate a range of interests centered on lung cancer screening, diagnostic imaging, and COVID-19 complications. Selected papers include:

  • "Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial" (2020), published in the New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Lung cancer LDCT screening and mortality reduction - evidence, pitfalls and future perspectives" (2020), published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
  • "Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Thromboembolic Complications in COVID-19: Report of the National Institute for Public Health of the Netherlands" (2020), published in Radiology
  • "Lung cancer prediction by Deep Learning to identify benign lung nodules" (2021), published in Lung Cancer
  • "Low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening: Clinical evidence and implementation research" (2022), published in the Journal of Internal Medicine

Frequent co-authors in Oudkerk's research include Marjolein A. Heuvelmans, Harry J. de Koning, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Peter M. A. van Ooijen, and Geertruida H. de Bock. These collaborations reflect interdisciplinary and multi-institutional efforts particularly in lung cancer screening and imaging studies.

Publications appear regularly in journals such as the Journal of Thoracic Oncology, European Radiology, European Journal of Cancer, Lung Cancer, and the British Journal of Radiology. These venues demonstrate a strong focus on thoracic oncology and medical imaging.

Best Publications

  • Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial

    Harry J. de Koning;Carlijn M. van der Aalst;Pim A. de Jong;Ernst T. Scholten

  • Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    J. Vansteenkiste;D. De Ruysscher;W.E.E. Eberhardt;E. Lim

  • Prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions in elderly people: a population based magnetic resonance imaging study. The Rotterdam Scan Study

    F-E de Leeuw;J C de Groot;E Achten;M Oudkerk

  • Cerebral white matter lesions and cognitive function: the Rotterdam Scan Study.

    Jan Cees De Groot;Frank‐Erik De Leeuw;Matthijs Oudkerk;Jan Van Gijn

  • Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography

    Koen Nieman;Matthijs Oudkerk;Benno Rensing;Peter van Ooijen

  • Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning

    Rob J van Klaveren;Matthijs Oudkerk;Mathias Prokop;Ernst T Scholten

  • Hypertension and cerebral white matter lesions in a prospective cohort study

    FE de Leeuw;FE de Leeuw;FE de Leeuw;de Jan Groot;de Jan Groot;Matthijs Oudkerk;Jcm Witteman

  • Incidence and Risk Factors of Silent Brain Infarcts in the Population-Based Rotterdam Scan Study

    Sarah E. Vermeer;Peter J. Koudstaal;Matthijs Oudkerk;Albert Hofman

  • Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis

    W. J. Heerink;G. H. de Bock;G. J. de Jonge;H. J. M. Groen

  • Coronary Calcification Improves Cardiovascular Risk Prediction in the Elderly

    Rozemarijn Vliegenthart;Matthijs Oudkerk;Albert Hofman;Hok-Hay S. Oei

  • Cerebral white matter lesions and the risk of dementia.

    Niels D. Prins;Ewoud J. van Dijk;Tom den Heijer;Sarah E. Vermeer

  • European position statement on lung cancer screening

    Matthijs Oudkerk;Anand Devaraj;Rozemarijn Vliegenthart;Thomas Henzler

  • Periventricular cerebral white matter lesions predict rate of cognitive decline

    Jan Cees De Groot;Frank-Erik De Leeuw;Frank-Erik De Leeuw;Matthijs Oudkerk;Jan Van Gijn

  • Lung cancer probability in patients with CT-detected pulmonary nodules: a prespecified analysis of data from the NELSON trial of low-dose CT screening

    Nanda Horeweg;Joost van Rosmalen;Marjolein A Heuvelmans;Carlijn M van der Aalst

  • Cerebral white matter lesions and depressive symptoms in elderly adults.

    Jan Cees de Groot;Frank-Erik de Leeuw;Matthijs Oudkerk;Albert Hofman

  • Homocysteine, silent brain infarcts, and white matter lesions: The Rotterdam Scan Study.

    Sarah E. Vermeer;Ewoud J. Van Dijk;Peter J. Koudstaal;Matthijs Oudkerk

  • Risk‐based selection from the general population in a screening trial: Selection criteria, recruitment and power for the Dutch‐Belgian randomised lung cancer multi‐slice CT screening trial (NELSON)

    Carola A. van Iersel;Harry J. de Koning;Gerrit Draisma;Willem P. T. M. Mali

  • The Association Between Blood Pressure, Hypertension, and Cerebral White Matter Lesions Cardiovascular Determinants of Dementia Study

    Ewoud J. van Dijk;Monique M.B. Breteler;Reinhold Schmidt;Klaus Berger

  • Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging

    Matthijs Oudkerk;Arthur E Stillman;Sandra S. Halliburton;Willi A. Kalender

  • Evaluation of Newer Risk Markers for Coronary Heart Disease Risk Classification: A Cohort Study

    Maryam Kavousi;Suzette Elias-Smale;Joost H. W. Rutten;Maarten J. G. Leening

Frequent Co-Authors

Harry J. de Koning
Harry J. de Koning Erasmus University Rotterdam
Albert Hofman
Albert Hofman Harvard University
Harry J.M. Groen
Harry J.M. Groen University Medical Center Groningen
Willem P.Th.M. Mali
Willem P.Th.M. Mali Utrecht University
Jacqueline C.M. Witteman
Jacqueline C.M. Witteman Erasmus University Rotterdam
Mathias Prokop
Mathias Prokop Radboud University
Bram van Ginneken
Bram van Ginneken Radboud University
Monique M.B. Breteler
Monique M.B. Breteler German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Ivana Išgum
Ivana Išgum University of Amsterdam
Pim van der Harst
Pim van der Harst University Medical Center Utrecht

External Links

Personal website of Matthijs Oudkerk

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens the door to a variety of related fields and degree options, especially with the increasing availability of accredited online programs. Many students looking to advance their careers in healthcare can benefit from flexible pathways outside traditional medical school.

Registered nurses (RNs) interested in becoming nurse practitioners can consider adn to fnp programs, which offer efficient bridges to advanced practice. Similarly, those wanting to further their nursing education with added convenience can choose from online rn to bsn programs no clinicals.

Outside of nursing, there’s a growing demand for experts in nutrition. Students can now earn a nutrition bachelor degree online, providing the knowledge to promote wellness and healthy lifestyles.

For those interested in the business side of healthcare, choosing a reputable online master’s program is crucial. Prospective leaders should look for which online healthcare administration programs have cahme accreditation? to ensure their degree meets industry standards.

Best Scientists Citing Matthijs Oudkerk

Albert Hofman

Albert Hofman

Harvard University

Publications: 169

Matthew J. Budoff

Matthew J. Budoff

UCLA Medical Center

Publications: 139

U. Joseph Schoepf

U. Joseph Schoepf

Medical University of South Carolina

Publications: 111

Filippo Cademartiri

Filippo Cademartiri

Fondazione Monasterio

Publications: 102

Monique M.B. Breteler

Monique M.B. Breteler

German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases

Publications: 95

Stephan Achenbach

Stephan Achenbach

University of Erlangen-Nuremberg

Publications: 86

Charles DeCarli

Charles DeCarli

University of California, Davis

Publications: 83

Mathias Prokop

Mathias Prokop

Radboud University

Publications: 83

M. Arfan Ikram

M. Arfan Ikram

Erasmus University Rotterdam

Publications: 75

Bram van Ginneken

Bram van Ginneken

Radboud University

Publications: 75

Lenore J. Launer

Lenore J. Launer

National Institutes of Health

Publications: 69

Meike W. Vernooij

Meike W. Vernooij

Erasmus University Rotterdam

Publications: 64

Philip Scheltens

Philip Scheltens

Amsterdam UMC

Publications: 61

Michael J. Blaha

Michael J. Blaha

Johns Hopkins University

Publications: 61

Wiro J. Niessen

Wiro J. Niessen

University Medical Center Groningen

Publications: 60

Christophe Tzourio

Christophe Tzourio

University of Bordeaux

Publications: 60

Trending Scientists

Tim E. Carpenter

Tim E. Carpenter

University of California, Davis

Rebecca J. Sheesley

Rebecca J. Sheesley

Baylor University

David Frank

David Frank

University of Arizona

Céline Boutin

Céline Boutin

Environment and Climate Change Canada

Salomon Bartnicki-Garcia

Salomon Bartnicki-Garcia

Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education at Ensenada

David R. Bundle

David R. Bundle

University of Alberta

K. Lenhard Rudolph

K. Lenhard Rudolph

National Institutes of Health

Daohong Zhou

Daohong Zhou

University of Florida

Buda Su

Buda Su

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Olivier Francis

Olivier Francis

University of Luxembourg

John M. Rose

John M. Rose

University of Sydney

Nimrod Megiddo

Nimrod Megiddo

IBM (United States)

Wilmot Li

Wilmot Li

Adobe Systems (United States)

Young Choong Kim

Young Choong Kim

Seoul National University

Wing-Yee So

Wing-Yee So

Chinese University of Hong Kong

Vitali Milman

Vitali Milman

Tel Aviv University

Related Medicine Rankings & Guides

2027 Best Online DNP Programs Without Clinicals

2027 Best Online DNP Programs Without Clinicals
2027 Easiest DNP Programs

2027 Easiest DNP Programs
2027 Fastest Online MSN in Forensic Nursing Programs

2027 Fastest Online MSN in Forensic Nursing Programs
2027 Fastest Online MSN in Nurse Midwifery Programs

2027 Fastest Online MSN in Nurse Midwifery Programs
2027 Best Nurse Practitioner Programs in Indiana – Accredited Schools Online & Campus

2027 Best Nurse Practitioner Programs in Indiana – Accredited Schools Online & Campus
2027 Most Affordable Online MSN in Nurse Executive Leadership Programs

2027 Most Affordable Online MSN in Nurse Executive Leadership Programs
2027 Easiest RN-to-MSN Online Programs to Get Into

2027 Easiest RN-to-MSN Online Programs to Get Into
2027 Best Online Nurse Leadership DNP Programs

2027 Best Online Nurse Leadership DNP Programs
2027 Fastest Online MSN in Psychiatric Mental Health NP Programs

2027 Fastest Online MSN in Psychiatric Mental Health NP Programs
2027 Most Affordable Online Accelerated BSN Programs for Non-Nurses

2027 Most Affordable Online Accelerated BSN Programs for Non-Nurses
2027 Fastest Online Nutrition Degree Programs

2027 Fastest Online Nutrition Degree Programs
September 2027 Best Online Doctorate in Pharmacy (PharmD.) Programs

September 2027 Best Online Doctorate in Pharmacy (PharmD.) Programs
2027 Best Nurse Practitioner Programs in Maryland – Accredited Schools Online & Campus

2027 Best Nurse Practitioner Programs in Maryland – Accredited Schools Online & Campus
2027 Easiest RN-to-BSN Online Programs

2027 Easiest RN-to-BSN Online Programs
2027 Most Affordable Online FNP Programs

2027 Most Affordable Online FNP Programs
2027 CMAA vs. CCMA Certification: Explaining the Difference

2027 CMAA vs. CCMA Certification: Explaining the Difference
2027 Fastest Online MSN in Health/Nursing Informatics Programs

2027 Fastest Online MSN in Health/Nursing Informatics Programs
2027 Best Nurse Practitioner Programs in Texas – Accredited Schools Online & Campus

2027 Best Nurse Practitioner Programs in Texas – Accredited Schools Online & Campus
2027 Fastest Online BSN to MSN Bridge Programs

2027 Fastest Online BSN to MSN Bridge Programs
2027 Best Online FNP Programs That Provide Preceptors

2027 Best Online FNP Programs That Provide Preceptors
September 2027 Best Online Kinesiology Programs

September 2027 Best Online Kinesiology Programs

Recently Published Articles

2027 Best Accredited Online Sports Psychology Bachelor's Degree Programs

2027 Best Accredited Online Sports Psychology Bachelor's Degree Programs
2027 Can You Get Licensed With an Online Native American Leadership Degree? Requirements, Rules, and What to Know

2027 Can You Get Licensed With an Online Native American Leadership Degree? Requirements, Rules, and What to Know
2027 Information Science vs. Data Science: Explaining the Difference

2027 Information Science vs. Data Science: Explaining the Difference
2027 Military-Friendly Online Business Development Degree Programs: Benefits, Accreditation, and Career Outcomes

2027 Military-Friendly Online Business Development Degree Programs: Benefits, Accreditation, and Career Outcomes
2027 Best Certification Programs for Careers That Pay Well

2027 Best Certification Programs for Careers That Pay Well
2027 MBA vs. Master's in Marriage & Family Counseling: Which Drives Better Career Outcomes

2027 MBA vs. Master's in Marriage & Family Counseling: Which Drives Better Career Outcomes
2027 Is Construction Management a Hard Major? What Students Should Know

2027 Is Construction Management a Hard Major? What Students Should Know
2027 Best Online Animal Science Master's Programs at Nonprofit Universities

2027 Best Online Animal Science Master's Programs at Nonprofit Universities
2027 Best AI Master's Degrees for AI in Manufacturing Careers

2027 Best AI Master's Degrees for AI in Manufacturing Careers
2027 Admission Requirements for Christian Ministry Master's Programs: GPA, Prerequisites & Eligibility Criteria

2027 Admission Requirements for Christian Ministry Master's Programs: GPA, Prerequisites & Eligibility Criteria
2027 Cheapest Accredited Online Electrical Engineering Master's Programs With Flat-Rate Tuition: Costs per Term and Total Degree Estimates

2027 Cheapest Accredited Online Electrical Engineering Master's Programs With Flat-Rate Tuition: Costs per Term and Total Degree Estimates
2027 Online Library Science Master's Programs With No Letters of Recommendation

2027 Online Library Science Master's Programs With No Letters of Recommendation
2027 Most Affordable BSN to PhD Online Bridge Programs

2027 Most Affordable BSN to PhD Online Bridge Programs
2027 How To Become a Radiology Nurse: Salary & Career Paths

2027 How To Become a Radiology Nurse: Salary & Career Paths
2027 Georgia Psychology Licensure Requirements – How to Become a Psychologist in Georgia

2027 Georgia Psychology Licensure Requirements – How to Become a Psychologist in Georgia
2027 Easiest Online Supply Chain Management Master's Degree Programs That Pay Well: High-Salary Degrees with Simple Admissions

2027 Easiest Online Supply Chain Management Master's Degree Programs That Pay Well: High-Salary Degrees with Simple Admissions
2027 Best Online English Master's Programs at Nonprofit Universities

2027 Best Online English Master's Programs at Nonprofit Universities
2027 Cost per Credit for Online Marketing Master's Programs: Tuition Comparison Guide

2027 Cost per Credit for Online Marketing Master's Programs: Tuition Comparison Guide
2027 Bioinformatics Degree Salary by Experience Level: Entry-Level, Mid-Career, and Senior Roles

2027 Bioinformatics Degree Salary by Experience Level: Entry-Level, Mid-Career, and Senior Roles
2027 AI Associate Degree vs Bootcamp: Which Path Makes More Sense?

2027 AI Associate Degree vs Bootcamp: Which Path Makes More Sense?
2027 Do Online Healthcare Management Programs Offer Weekly Start Dates? Enrollment Calendar & Start Options

2027 Do Online Healthcare Management Programs Offer Weekly Start Dates? Enrollment Calendar & Start Options