World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
26109
World Ranking
14629
National Ranking
7400

Scott E. Eggener publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott E. Eggener sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 486 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Scott E. Eggener D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott E. Eggener sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott E. Eggener is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. The scientist's research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with significant contributions across several subfields. These subfields include Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Oncology, Rheumatology, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

Eggener's main research topics focus largely on prostate cancer, incorporating areas such as treatment and research, diagnosis and treatment, and the broader spectrum of urologic and reproductive health conditions. Additional topics include testicular diseases and treatments, bladder and urothelial cancer treatments, sarcoma diagnosis and treatment, and health systems with economic evaluations related to quality of life.

Frequent publication venues for the scientist's work include:

  • The Journal of Urology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • European Urology
  • Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations
  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Eggener are:

  • Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline, Part I: Introduction, Risk Assessment, Staging, and Risk-Based Management (2022), published in The Journal of Urology
  • Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: AUA/SUO Guideline Part I: Prostate Cancer Screening (2023), published in The Journal of Urology
  • Implementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019 (2020), published in Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline, Part II: Principles of Active Surveillance, Principles of Surgery, and Follow-Up (2022), published in The Journal of Urology
  • Pretransplant solid organ malignancy and organ transplant candidacy: A consensus expert opinion statement (2020), published in American Journal of Transplantation

Eggener collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Aditya Bagrodia
  • Matthew R. Cooperberg
  • Siamak Daneshmand
  • Ragheed Saoud
  • Gladell P. Paner

Best Publications

  • MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis

    Veeru Kasivisvanathan;Antti S. Rannikko;Marcelo Borghi;Valeria Panebianco

  • Predicting 15-Year Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy

    Scott E. Eggener;Peter T. Scardino;Patrick C. Walsh;Misop Han

  • POTENCY, CONTINENCE AND COMPLICATIONS IN 3,477 CONSECUTIVE RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMIES

    Shilajit D. Kundu;Kimberly A. Roehl;Scott E. Eggener;Jo Ann V. Antenor

  • Standards of Reporting for MRI-targeted Biopsy Studies (START) of the Prostate: Recommendations from an International Working Group.

    Caroline M. Moore;Veeru Kasivisvanathan;Scott Eggener;Mark Emberton

  • Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Critical Appraisal of Rationale and Modalities

    Scott E. Eggener;Peter T. Scardino;Peter R. Carroll;Michael J. Zelefsky

  • The role of SPINK1 in ETS rearrangement-negative prostate cancers.

    Scott A. Tomlins;Daniel R. Rhodes;Jianjun Yu;Sooryanarayana Varambally

  • Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR

    Andrew B. Rosenkrantz;Sadhna Verma;Peter Choyke;Steven C. Eberhardt

  • Pathological upgrading and up staging with immediate repeat biopsy in patients eligible for active surveillance.

    Ryan K. Berglund;Timothy A. Masterson;Kinjal C. Vora;Scott E. Eggener

  • Management of Small Renal Masses: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline

    Antonio Finelli;Nofisat Ismaila;Bill Bro;Jeremy Durack

  • New and Established Technology in Focal Ablation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review

    Massimo Valerio;Massimo Valerio;Massimo Valerio;Yannick Cerantola;Scott E. Eggener;Herbert Lepor

  • Renal cell carcinoma recurrence after nephrectomy for localized disease: predicting survival from time of recurrence.

    Scott E. Eggener;Ofer Yossepowitch;Joseph A. Pettus;Mark E. Snyder

  • Positive Surgical Margins at Partial Nephrectomy: Predictors and Oncological Outcomes

    Ofer Yossepowitch;R. Houston Thompson;Bradley C. Leibovich;Scott E. Eggener

  • Diffusion-Weighted and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Prostate Cancer: Correlation of Quantitative MR Parameters With Gleason Score and Tumor Angiogenesis

    Aytekin Oto;Cheng Yang;Arda Kayhan;Maria Tretiakova

  • Urinary cytology has a poor performance for predicting invasive or high-grade upper-tract urothelial carcinoma.

    Jamie Messer;Shahrokh F. Shariat;James C. Brien;Michael P. Herman

  • Increasing incidence of metastatic prostate cancer in the United States (2004–2013)

    A B Weiner;R S Matulewicz;S E Eggener;E M Schaeffer

  • Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized, High Risk Prostate Cancer: Critical Analysis of Risk Assessment Methods

    Ofer Yossepowitch;Scott E. Eggener;Fernando J. Bianco;Brett S. Carver

  • Nitric oxide contributes to the rise in forearm blood flow during mental stress in humans.

    N M Dietz;J M Rivera;S E Eggener;R T Fix

  • Focal Therapy: Patients, Interventions, and Outcomes—A Report from a Consensus Meeting

    Ian A. Donaldson;Ian A. Donaldson;Roberto Alonzi;Dean Barratt;Eric Barret

  • Preoperative Hydronephrosis, Ureteroscopic Biopsy Grade and Urinary Cytology Can Improve Prediction of Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

    James C. Brien;Shahrokh If. Shariat;Michael P. Herman;Casey K. Ng

  • Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score--a computer-aided diagnosis development study.

    Yahui Peng;Yulei Jiang;Cheng Yang;Jeremy Bancroft Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter T. Scardino
Peter T. Scardino Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
James A. Eastham
James A. Eastham Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Jay D. Raman
Jay D. Raman Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Paul Russo
Paul Russo Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
William J. Catalona
William J. Catalona Northwestern University
Peter A. Pinto
Peter A. Pinto National Institutes of Health
Eric A. Klein
Eric A. Klein Cleveland Clinic
Yair Lotan
Yair Lotan The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Mark Emberton
Mark Emberton University College London
Robert G. Uzzo
Robert G. Uzzo Fox Chase Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding online healthcare degrees and professional paths. For those interested in leadership, the top cahme-accredited mha programs provide flexible options to earn a Master of Healthcare Administration. These programs are highly reputable and ideal for those looking to advance into management or executive roles.

Nursing professionals aiming to upgrade their qualifications can consider the online rn to bsn no clinicals degrees. These programs allow registered nurses to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing without on-site clinical requirements, making it easier for working nurses to keep up with the demands of their jobs.

For nurses interested in the highest level of clinical practice, there are short dnp programs available online. These accelerated programs enable nurses to quickly earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice and take on advanced practice or leadership roles. If finding a manageable workload is a priority, candidates can explore the easiest dnp program online resources to match their personal and professional needs.

Best Scientists Citing Scott E. Eggener

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles