World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
33250
World Ranking
11686
National Ranking
5992

Peter A. Pinto publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Pinto sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 796 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter A. Pinto D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Pinto sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter A. Pinto is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the field of Medicine, with extensive work in subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Rheumatology, Surgery, and Cancer Research.

Their main research topics include:

  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Urologic and reproductive health conditions
  • MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

Peter A. Pinto has contributed to multiple recent research papers, highlighting advancements in prostate cancer diagnostics and related imaging methodologies. Notable publications include:

  • MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel, 2020, Radiology
  • Implementation of Germline Testing for Prostate Cancer: Philadelphia Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Standardized Nomenclature and Surveillance Methodologies After Focal Therapy and Partial Gland Ablation for Localized Prostate Cancer: An International Multidisciplinary Consensus, 2020, European Urology
  • Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS Version 2.1 for Prostate Cancer Detection, 2020, American Journal of Roentgenology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several peers, including:

  • Barış Türkbey
  • Bradford J. Wood
  • Peter L. Choyke
  • Maria J. Merino
  • Sandeep Gurram

Peter A. Pinto's publications are commonly found in specific venues, demonstrating a focused dissemination of research. Prominent publication venues include:

  • The Journal of Urology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • British Journal of Urology
  • Academic Radiology
  • Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations

Best Publications

  • Oncogenic Signaling Pathways in The Cancer Genome Atlas

    Francisco Sanchez-Vega;Marco Mina;Joshua Armenia;Walid K. Chatila

  • The Molecular Taxonomy of Primary Prostate Cancer

    Adam Abeshouse;Jaeil Ahn;Rehan Akbani;Adrian Ally

  • MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis

    Veeru Kasivisvanathan;Antti S. Rannikko;Marcelo Borghi;Valeria Panebianco

  • Comprehensive Characterization of Cancer Driver Genes and Mutations.

    Matthew H Bailey;Collin Tokheim;Eduard Porta-Pardo;Sohini Sengupta

  • Comparison of MR/Ultrasound Fusion–Guided Biopsy With Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

    M. Minhaj Siddiqui;M. Minhaj Siddiqui;Soroush Rais-Bahrami;Soroush Rais-Bahrami;Baris Turkbey;Arvin K. George

  • Genomic and Functional Approaches to Understanding Cancer Aneuploidy

    Alison M. Taylor;Alison M. Taylor;Juliann Shih;Gavin Ha;Gavin Ha;Galen F. Gao

  • Pathogenic Germline Variants in 10,389 Adult Cancers

    Kuan-Lin Huang;R Jay Mashl;Yige Wu;Deborah I Ritter

  • MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis

    Michael Ahdoot;Andrew R Wilbur;Sarah E Reese;Amir H Lebastchi

  • Multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds

    Baris Turkbey;Haresh Mani;Vijay Shah;Vijay Shah;Ardeshir R. Rastinehad

  • BHD mutations, clinical and molecular genetic investigations of Birt-Hogg-Dubé Syndrome: A new series of 50 families and a review of published reports

    J. R. Toro;M.-H. Wei;G. M. Glenn;M. Weinreich

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsy Improves Cancer Detection Following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy and Correlates With Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Peter A. Pinto;Paul H. Chung;Ardeshir R. Rastinehad;Angelo A. Baccala

  • Erratum: Comprehensive Characterization of Cancer Driver Genes and Mutations (ARTICLE (2018) 173(2) (371–385), (S009286741830237X), (10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.060))

    Matthew H. Bailey;Collin Tokheim;Eduard Porta-Pardo;Sohini Sengupta

  • Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection--histopathologic correlation.

    Baris Turkbey;Peter A. Pinto;Haresh Mani;Marcelino Bernardo

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy Significantly Upgrades Prostate Cancer Versus Systematic 12-core Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy

    M. Minhaj Siddiqui;Soroush Rais-Bahrami;Hong Truong;Lambros Stamatakis

  • The morphologic spectrum of kidney tumors in hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC) syndrome.

    Maria J. Merino;Carlos Torres-Cabala;Peter Pinto;William Marston Linehan

  • Standards of Reporting for MRI-targeted Biopsy Studies (START) of the Prostate: Recommendations from an International Working Group.

    Caroline M. Moore;Veeru Kasivisvanathan;Scott Eggener;Mark Emberton

  • Is apparent diffusion coefficient associated with clinical risk scores for prostate cancers that are visible on 3-T MR images?

    Baris Turkbey;Vijay P. Shah;Yuxi Pang;Marcelino Bernardo

  • Pan-cancer Alterations of the MYC Oncogene and Its Proximal Network across the Cancer Genome Atlas

    Franz X. Schaub;Varsha Dhankani;Ashton C. Berger;Mihir Trivedi

  • Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR

    Andrew B. Rosenkrantz;Sadhna Verma;Peter Choyke;Steven C. Eberhardt

  • Prostate Cancer: Interobserver Agreement and Accuracy with the Revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System at Multiparametric MR Imaging.

    Berrend G. Muller;Joanna H. Shih;Sandeep Sankineni;Jamie Marko;Jamie Marko

Frequent Co-Authors

Baris Turkbey
Baris Turkbey National Institutes of Health
Peter L. Choyke
Peter L. Choyke National Institutes of Health
Bradford J. Wood
Bradford J. Wood National Institutes of Health
Maria J. Merino
Maria J. Merino National Institutes of Health
W. Marston Linehan
W. Marston Linehan National Institutes of Health
Pingkun Yan
Pingkun Yan Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
James L. Gulley
James L. Gulley National Institutes of Health
Peter R. Carroll
Peter R. Carroll University of California, San Francisco
Purang Abolmaesumi
Purang Abolmaesumi University of British Columbia
Ronald M. Summers
Ronald M. Summers National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The journey to a medical career often begins with nursing. For current RNs looking to advance, many universities offer cheapest accredited online rn to bsn programs to help students earn a BSN without taking on significant debt. These programs are ideal for working professionals who need flexibility and affordability.

Those without a nursing background can explore entry level msn programs online. These accelerated options allow students with non-nursing degrees to transition quickly into advanced nursing roles, opening doors to a wide range of healthcare careers.

Some aspiring nurses seek faster entry with direct admit nursing programs. These schools offer streamlined admissions and are often less competitive, making them a practical choice for students eager to start their education right away.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, medical billing and coding online schools provide accessible pathways to in-demand careers. These programs are available fully online, often with financial aid, and can lead to quick employment in the growing healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Peter A. Pinto

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles