World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marika Edoff

Marika Edoff

D-Index & Metrics

Materials Science

D-Index
54
Citations
9935
World Ranking
8943
National Ranking
96

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
54
Citations
9627
World Ranking
3248
National Ranking
25

Marika Edoff publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marika Edoff sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 228 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Marika Edoff D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marika Edoff sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marika Edoff is affiliated with Uppsala University in Sweden. Their primary research focuses on materials science and engineering, with a particular emphasis on materials chemistry and electrical and electronic engineering.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the study of chalcogenide semiconductor thin films, and their work also covers topics such as quantum dots synthesis and properties, copper-based nanomaterials and applications, semiconductor materials and interfaces, electrocatalysts for energy conversion, hybrid renewable energy systems, and advanced battery technologies research.

Frequent co-authors of Edoff include Jan Keller, Lars Stolt, P.M.P. Salomé, Kostiantyn V. Sopiha, and Jennifer P. Teixeira.

They have published many papers in several notable journals. The key publication venues include:

  • Solar RRL
  • Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications
  • ACS Applied Energy Materials
  • Journal of Materials Chemistry A
  • Nature Energy

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Marika Edoff are:

  • High-concentration silver alloying and steep back-contact gallium grading enabling copper indium gallium selenide solar cell with 23.6% efficiency, 2024, Nature Energy
  • Wide-gap (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells with different buffer materials-A path to a better heterojunction, 2020, Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications
  • 2-Terminal CIGS-perovskite tandem cells: A layer by layer exploration, 2020, Solar Energy
  • Development of Various Photovoltaic-Driven Water Electrolysis Technologies for Green Solar Hydrogen Generation, 2021, Solar RRL
  • SnOx Atomic Layer Deposition on Bare Perovskite-An Investigation of Initial Growth Dynamics, Interface Chemistry, and Solar Cell Performance, 2021, ACS Applied Energy Materials

Best Publications

  • Chemical Insights into the Instability of Cu(2)ZnSnS(4) Films during Annealing

    Jonathan J. Scragg;Tove Ericson;Tomas Kubart;Marika Edoff

  • A Detrimental Reaction at the Molybdenum Back Contact in Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)4 Thin-Film Solar Cells

    Jonathan J Scragg;J Timo Wätjen;Marika Edoff;Tove Ericson

  • Sustainable solar hydrogen production: from photoelectrochemical cells to PV-electrolyzers and back again

    T. Jesper Jacobsson;Viktor Fjällström;Marika Edoff;Tomas Edvinsson

  • High-concentration silver alloying and steep back-contact gallium grading enabling copper indium gallium selenide solar cell with 23.6% efficiency

    Unknown

  • The effect of Ga-grading in CIGS thin film solar cells

    Olle Lundberg;Marika Edoff;Lars Stolt

  • Strong valence-band offset bowing of ZnO1-xSx enhances p-type nitrogen doping of ZnO-like alloys.

    Clas Persson;Charlotte Platzer-Björkman;Jonas Malmström;Tobias Törndahl

  • A monolithic device for solar water splitting based on series interconnected thin film absorbers reaching over 10% solar-to-hydrogen efficiency

    Jesper T. Jacobsson;Viktor Fjällström;Martin Häggblad Sahlberg;Marika Edoff

  • Influence of precursor sulfur content on film formation and compositional changes in Cu2ZnSnS4 films and solar cells

    Charlotte Platzer-Björkman;Jonathan Scragg;H Flammersberger;Tomas Kubart

  • Inline Cu(In,Ga)Se $_{2}$ Co-evaporation for High-Efficiency Solar Cells and Modules

    J. Lindahl;U. Zimmermann;P. Szaniawski;T. Torndahl

  • Development of rear surface passivated Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin film solar cells with nano-sized local rear point contacts

    Bart Vermang;Viktor Fjällström;Jonas Pettersson;Pedro Salomé

  • Diffusion of indium and gallium in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin film solar cells

    Olle Lundberg;Jun Lu;Angus Rockett;Marika Edoff

  • Employing Si solar cell technology to increase efficiency of ultra-thin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells.

    Bart Vermang;Jörn Timo Wätjen;Viktor Fjällström;Fredrik Rostvall

  • Atomic layer deposition of Zn1−xMgxO buffer layers for Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells

    Tobias Törndahl;Charlotte Platzer-Björkman;John Kessler;Marika Edoff

  • Rapid annealing of reactively sputtered precursors for Cu2ZnSnS4 solar cells

    Jonathan J. Scragg;Tove Ericson;Xavier Fontané;Victor Izquierdo‐Roca

  • Understanding defect-related issues limiting efficiency of CIGS solar cells

    Małgorzata Igalson;Paweł Zabierowski;Daniel Prządo;Aleksander Urbaniak

  • Direct evidence of current blocking by ZnSe in Cu2ZnSnSe4 solar cells

    Jörn Timo Wätjen;Jessica Engman;Marika Edoff;Charlotte Platzer-Björkman

  • Laser patterning of P2 interconnect via in thin-film CIGS PV modules

    Per-Oskar Westin;Uwe Zimmermann;Marika Edoff

  • Optimizing Ga-profiles for highly efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin film solar cells in simple and complex defect models

    C Frisk;C Platzer-Björkman;J Olsson;P Szaniawski

  • High V oc in (Cu,Ag)(In,Ga)Se 2 Solar Cells

    Marika Edoff;Tobias Jarmar;Nina Shariati Nilsson;Erik Wallin

  • Improved Rear Surface Passivation of Cu(In,Ga)Se $_{f 2}$ Solar Cells: A Combination of an Al $_{f 2}$ O $_{f 3}$ Rear Surface Passivation Layer and Nanosized Local Rear Point Contacts

    Bart Vermang;Viktor Fjällström;Xindong Gao;Marika Edoff

  • The effect of Zn1−xSnxOy buffer layer thickness in 18.0% efficient Cd‐free Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells

    Johan Lindahl;Jörn Timo Wätjen;Adam Hultqvist;Tove Ericson

  • Investigating the electronic properties of Al2O3/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 interface

    R. Kotipalli;Bart Vermang;Bart Vermang;J. Joel;R. Rajkumar

Frequent Co-Authors

Denis Flandre
Denis Flandre Université Catholique de Louvain
Tomas Edvinsson
Tomas Edvinsson Uppsala University
Sascha Sadewasser
Sascha Sadewasser International Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory
Clas Persson
Clas Persson University of Oslo
Stéphane Collin
Stéphane Collin Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Marko Topič
Marko Topič University of Ljubljana
Erik M. J. Johansson
Erik M. J. Johansson Umeå University
Gerrit Boschloo
Gerrit Boschloo Uppsala University
Gunnar A. Niklasson
Gunnar A. Niklasson Uppsala University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring 6 week certification programs online can help students quickly gain specialized skills relevant to engineering and technology. These accelerated courses are ideal for those seeking rapid entry into the workforce or professionals aiming to upskill for career advancement.

Many engineering and technology students consider diversifying their expertise with business and finance knowledge. For those interested, pursuing an online finance degree can complement technical skills with crucial financial acumen.

Graduates seeking leadership roles may also benefit from enrolling in accelerated mba programs usa. These programs focus on fast-tracking business education, preparing students for management and executive positions in technology-driven industries.

Finally, with the growing intersection of technology and law, the best online paralegal programs provide a flexible way to understand legal frameworks affecting intellectual property, technology contracts, and compliance—essential knowledge for tech professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Marika Edoff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles