World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
66
Citations
15913
World Ranking
2712
National Ranking
161

Scott M. Hofer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott M. Hofer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 236 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Scott M. Hofer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott M. Hofer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott M. Hofer is affiliated with the University of Victoria in Canada. Their research spans medicine and psychology, with a primary focus on health-related aspects of aging, cognitive impairment, and mental health. Their contributions include studies within clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, health, psychiatry and mental health, and neuropsychology and physiological psychology.

Among their main research topics are:

  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Dementia and cognitive impairment research
  • Aging and gerontology research
  • COVID-19 and mental health
  • Health, environment, cognitive aging
  • Frailty in older adults
  • Personality traits and psychology

Scott M. Hofer has been cited in recent publications including:

  • "Trajectories of Big Five Personality Traits: A Coordinated Analysis of 16 Longitudinal Samples" (2020), European Journal of Personality
  • "A longitudinal analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of middle-aged and older adults from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging" (2021), Nature Aging
  • "The Dementias Platform UK (DPUK) Data Portal" (2020), European Journal of Epidemiology
  • "Is Healthy Neuroticism Associated with Health Behaviors? A Coordinated Integrative Data Analysis" (2020), Collabra Psychology
  • "Assessment of Functional Mobility After COVID-19 in Adults Aged 50 Years or Older in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging" (2022), JAMA Network Open

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Scott M. Hofer include:

  • Graciela Muñiz-Terrera
  • Nathan A. Lewis
  • Tomiko Yoneda
  • Andrea M. Piccinin
  • Stacey Voll

Their work is often published in venues such as:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Collabra Psychology
  • BMC Public Health
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A

Best Publications

  • The unity and diversity of executive functions: A systematic review and re-analysis of latent variable studies.

    Justin E. Karr;Corson N. Areshenkoff;Philippe Rast;Scott M. Hofer

  • A 2 × 2 Achievement Goals Questionnaire for Sport: Evidence for Factorial Invariance, Temporal Stability, and External Validity

    David E. Conroy;Andrew J. Elliot;Scott M. Hofer

  • Social Context in Gene–Environment Interactions: Retrospect and Prospect

    Michael J. Shanahan;Scott M. Hofer

  • Maximizing the Usefulness of Data Obtained with Planned Missing Value Patterns: An Application of Maximum Likelihood Procedures.

    John W. Graham;Scott M. Hofer;David P. MacKinnon

  • Predictors of maternal child-feeding style: maternal and child characteristics

    Lori A. Francis;Scott M. Hofer;Leann L. Birch

  • Perspectives on ethnic and racial disparities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: Update and areas of immediate need

    Ganesh M. Babulal;Yakeel T. Quiroz;Benedict C. Albensi;Eider Arenaza-Urquijo

  • The Dynamic Relationship Between Physical Function and Cognition in Longitudinal Aging Cohorts

    Sean A. P. Clouston;Sean A. P. Clouston;Paul Brewster;Diana Kuh;Diana Kuh;Marcus Richards;Marcus Richards

  • Cohort Profile: The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA).

    Parminder Raina;Parminder Raina;Christina Wolfson;Christina Wolfson;Susan Kirkland;Lauren E Griffith;Lauren E Griffith

  • Psychopathology in Young People With Intellectual Disability

    Stewart L. Einfeld;Andrea M. Piccinin;Andrea M. Piccinin;Andrew Mackinnon;Scott M. Hofer;Scott M. Hofer

  • Major abilities and development in the adult period.

    John L. Horn;Scott M. Hofer

  • Multiple Imputation in Multivariate Research

    John W. Graham;Scott M. Hofer

  • Intraindividual coupling of daily stress and cognition.

    Martin J. Sliwinski;Joshua M. Smyth;Scott M. Hofer;Robert S. Stawski

  • Understanding Ageing. An evaluation of research designs for assessing the interdependence of ageing-related changes.

    Scott M. Hofer;Martin J. Sliwinski

  • Comorbid type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension exacerbates cognitive decline: evidence from a longitudinal study

    Linda B. Hassing;Scott M. Hofer;Sven E. Nilsson;Stig Berg

  • Integrative data analysis through coordination of measurement and analysis protocol across independent longitudinal studies.

    Scott M. Hofer;Andrea M. Piccinin

  • Analysis with missing data in drug prevention research.

    J. W. Graham;S. M. Hofer;A. M. Piccinin

  • Guidelines for reporting methodological challenges and evaluating potential bias in dementia research.

    Jennifer Weuve;Cécile Proust-Lima;Melinda C. Power;Alden L. Gross

  • Personality predicts mortality risk: An integrative data analysis of 15 international longitudinal studies

    Eileen Kranz Graham;Joshua P. Rutsohn;Nicholas A. Turiano;Rebecca Bendayan

  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus contributes to cognitive decline in old age: A longitudinal population-based study

    Linda B. Hassing;Michael D. Grant;Scott M. Hofer;Nancy L. Pedersen

  • A latent growth curve analysis of late-life sensory and cognitive function over 8 years: evidence for specific and common factors underlying change

    Kaarin J. Anstey;Scott M. Hofer;Mary A. Luszcz

  • Modeling memory decline in older adults: the importance of preclinical dementia, attrition, and chronological age.

    Martin J. Sliwinski;Scott M. Hofer;Charles Hall;Herman Buschke

  • Handbook of cognitive aging : interdisciplinary perspectives

    Scott M Hofer;Duane F. Alwin

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrea M. Piccinin
Andrea M. Piccinin University of Victoria
Boo Johansson
Boo Johansson University of Gothenburg
Lauren E. Griffith
Lauren E. Griffith McMaster University
Sylvie Belleville
Sylvie Belleville University of Montreal
Martin J. Sliwinski
Martin J. Sliwinski Pennsylvania State University
Avron Spiro
Avron Spiro Boston University
Andrew Mackinnon
Andrew Mackinnon University of New South Wales
Lesa Hoffman
Lesa Hoffman University of Iowa
K. Warner Schaie
K. Warner Schaie University of Washington
Gerald E. McClearn
Gerald E. McClearn Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about studying psychology, you may also be interested in related online degrees and career paths, such as counseling. Online counseling programs can be a flexible and supportive option for students balancing work, family, and education. They often lead to rewarding positions in schools, clinics, social service organizations, and private practice.

Cost is a significant factor for many students. Affordable online programs make education accessible, and options vary widely by region. For those exploring programs in Louisiana, check out the cheapest counseling programs in New Orleans. If New Jersey is more convenient, consider the cheapest counseling degrees in New Jersey.

Aspiring professionals in New York should explore the cheapest counseling degrees in New York. Meanwhile, those living in the Midwest may benefit from the cheapest counseling degrees in Ohio.

By researching and comparing program costs and formats, you can find the right fit to launch or advance your career in psychology or counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Scott M. Hofer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles