World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 77 1636 1467 972 852 325 25197

Martin J. Sliwinski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin J. Sliwinski between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin J. Sliwinski published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 49 publications in 2024. 89 of the 492 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 49. Peak 49 publications in 2024. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 5 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 32 publications 2023: 46 publications 2024: 49 publications 2025: 40 publications
1972 2025

492 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin J. Sliwinski: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 1
1975 1
1976 1
1977 0
1978 1
1979 5
1980 3
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 2
1988 1
1989 0
1990 2
1991 6
1992 8
1993 2
1994 3
1995 6
1996 6
1997 4
1998 10
1999 10
2000 7
2001 5
2002 7
2003 5
2004 3
2005 2
2006 6
2007 3
2008 5
2009 5
2010 4
2011 5
2012 5
2013 14
2014 13
2015 11
2016 13
2017 22
2018 25
2019 29
2020 37
2021 24
2022 32
2023 46
2024 49
2025 40
Total 492
Download as CSV

Martin J. Sliwinski publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Sliwinski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–330 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 325 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76 325
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin J. Sliwinski D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Sliwinski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 77
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin J. Sliwinski is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and medicine, with a notable emphasis on experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, health, social psychology, and neuropsychology and physiological psychology.

The researcher has contributed extensively to topics including dementia and cognitive impairment research, health disparities and outcomes, mental health research, aging and gerontology, psychological well-being and life satisfaction, stress responses and cortisol, and cognitive functions and memory.

Frequent publication venues for their work include Innovation in Aging, Alzheimer's & Dementia, The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, and Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring.

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Martin J. Sliwinski are:

  • T-MoCA: A valid phone screen for cognitive impairment in diverse community samples, 2021, Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring
  • Rural Population Health and Aging: Toward a Multilevel and Multidimensional Research Agenda for the 2020s, 2020, American Journal of Public Health
  • Variability in Cognitive Performance on Mobile Devices Is Sensitive to Mild Cognitive Impairment: Results From the Einstein Aging Study, 2021, Frontiers in Digital Health
  • Unsupervised high-frequency smartphone-based cognitive assessments are reliable, valid, and feasible in older adults at risk for Alzheimer's disease, 2022, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • A highly feasible, reliable, and fully remote protocol for mobile app-based cognitive assessment in cognitively healthy older adults, 2022, Alzheimer's & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring

Frequent coauthors with notable counts of joint publications include Mindy J. Katz, Jennifer E. Graham-Engeland, Karra Harrington, Stacey Scott, and Richard B. Lipton.

Best Publications

  • Leisure Activities and the Risk of Dementia in the Elderly

    Joe Verghese;Richard B. Lipton;Mindy J. Katz;Charles B. Hall

  • Screening for dementia with the Memory Impairment Screen

    Herman Buschke;G. Kuslansky;M. Katz;W. F. Stewart

  • Classification of daily and near-daily headaches: Field trial of revised IHS criteria

    Stephen D. Silberstein;Richard B. Lipton;Martin John Sliwinski

  • Development and Validation of a Model for Estimating Premorbid Verbal Intelligence in the Elderly

    Ellen Grober;Martin Sliwinski

  • Daily and momentary mood and stress are associated with binge eating and vomiting in bulimia nervosa patients in the natural environment.

    Joshua M. Smyth;Stephen A. Wonderlich;Kristin E. Heron;Martin J. Sliwinski

  • Aging and dual-task performance: a meta-analysis.

    Paul Verhaeghen;David W. Steitz;Martin J. Sliwinski;John Cerella

  • Neuropsychological prediction of dementia and the absence of dementia in healthy elderly persons.

    David M. Masur;M. Sliwinski;R. B. Lipton;A. D. Blau

  • The Wear and Tear of Daily Stressors on Mental Health

    Susan T. Charles;Jennifer R. Piazza;Jacqueline Mogle;Martin J. Sliwinski

  • Reported exposure and emotional reactivity to daily stressors: the roles of adult age and global perceived stress.

    Robert S. Stawski;Martin J. Sliwinski;David M. Almeida;Joshua M. Smyth

  • Cognitive activities delay onset of memory decline in persons who develop dementia

    C. B. Hall;R. B. Lipton;M. Sliwinski;M. J. Katz

  • Intraindividual coupling of daily stress and cognition.

    Martin J. Sliwinski;Joshua M. Smyth;Scott M. Hofer;Robert S. Stawski

  • Affective Reactivity to Daily Stressors and Long-Term Risk of Reporting a Chronic Physical Health Condition

    Jennifer R. Piazza;Jennifer R. Piazza;Susan T. Charles;Martin J. Sliwinski;Jacqueline Mogle

  • Understanding Ageing. An evaluation of research designs for assessing the interdependence of ageing-related changes.

    Scott M. Hofer;Martin J. Sliwinski

  • Aging and Task Switching: A Meta-Analysis

    Christina Wasylyshyn;Paul Verhaeghen;Martin J. Sliwinski

  • Measurement-Burst Designs for Social Health Research

    Martin J. Sliwinski

  • Reliability and Validity of Ambulatory Cognitive Assessments

    Martin J. Sliwinski;Jacqueline A. Mogle;Jinshil Hyun;Elizabeth Munoz

  • Intraindividual change and variability in daily stress processes: findings from two measurement-burst diary studies.

    Martin J. Sliwinski;David M. Almeida;Joshua Smyth;Robert S. Stawski

  • Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers.

    Susan E Collins;Kate B Carey;Martin J Sliwinski

  • Memory and mental status correlates of modified Braak staging

    E. Grober;D. Dickson;M.J. Sliwinski;H. Buschke

  • Diagnosis of early dementia by the Double Memory Test: encoding specificity improves diagnostic sensitivity and specificity

    Herman Buschke;Martin J. Sliwinski;Gail Kuslansky;Richard B. Lipton

  • The Effects of Preclinical Dementia on Estimates of Normal Cognitive Functioning in Aging

    Martin Sliwinski;Richard B. Lipton;Herman Buschke;Walter Stewart

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard B. Lipton
Richard B. Lipton Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Mindy J. Katz
Mindy J. Katz Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Joshua M. Smyth
Joshua M. Smyth Pennsylvania State University
Molly E. Zimmerman
Molly E. Zimmerman Fordham University
Jacqueline Mogle
Jacqueline Mogle Pennsylvania State University
David M. Almeida
David M. Almeida Pennsylvania State University
Scott M. Hofer
Scott M. Hofer University of Victoria
Robert S. Stawski
Robert S. Stawski Utah State University
Herman Buschke
Herman Buschke Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Charles B. Hall
Charles B. Hall Albert Einstein College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA can open doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways, especially in fields that address critical community needs. One such pathway is substance abuse counseling, a profession experiencing rapid growth due to increasing awareness of addiction and mental health issues.

Becoming a counselor often requires a blend of academic credentials and practical training. Depending on your location, the criteria can differ. For example, those interested in the substance abuse counselor requirements in Fort Worth will find a unique set of educational and certification standards. Similarly, the Fremont substance abuse counselors education requirements highlight the importance of specialized coursework and supervised experience.

Aspiring professionals considering becoming a substance abuse counselor in Fresno or reviewing the Garland substance abuse counselors education requirements should pay close attention to state-specific licensing rules. Many universities now offer flexible online degrees related to psychology and counseling that can help meet these requirements, making it easier for students to balance education with other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Martin J. Sliwinski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles