World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Johannes Hendricks

Johannes Hendricks

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
33
Citations
6606
World Ranking
9516
National Ranking
568

Johannes Hendricks publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes Hendricks sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 106 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Johannes Hendricks D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes Hendricks sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Johannes Hendricks is affiliated with the German Aerospace Center in Germany and has an extensive publication record in environmental science and earth and planetary sciences. Their research predominantly focuses on atmospheric science and its intersections with global and planetary change.

The scientist's work covers several subfields including atmospheric science, global and planetary change, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, automotive engineering, and earth-surface processes. Their primary areas of study encompass atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, atmospheric ozone and climate, air quality and health impacts, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, advanced aircraft design and technologies, and vehicle emissions and performance.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Hendricks include:

  • Mattia Righi
  • Christof Gerhard Beer
  • Volker Grewe
  • Sigrun Matthes
  • Ulrike Burkhardt

Hendricks has published frequently in several scientific journals, most notably:

  • Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • Geoscientific Model Development
  • Aerospace
  • Earth System Dynamics
  • Journal of Climate

Some recent papers by Johannes Hendricks include:

  • Mitigation of Non-CO2 Aviation's Climate Impact by Changing Cruise Altitudes (2021, Aerospace)
  • Coupling Aerosols to (Cirrus) Clouds in the Global EMAC-MADE3 Aerosol-Climate Model (2020, Geoscientific Model Development)
  • Seasonal Updraft Speeds Change Cloud Droplet Number Concentrations in Low-Level Clouds over the Western North Atlantic (2022, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)
  • Exploring the Uncertainties in the Aviation Soot-Cirrus Effect (2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics)
  • Modelling Mineral Dust Emissions and Atmospheric Dispersion with MADE3 in EMAC v2.54 (2020, Geoscientific Model Development)

Best Publications

  • Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within AeroCom

    C. Textor;M. Schulz;S. Guibert;S. Kinne

  • An AeroCom Initial Assessment - Optical Properties in Aerosol Component Modules of Global Models

    S. Kinne;M. Schulz;C. Textor;S. Guibert

  • Single‐particle measurements of midlatitude black carbon and light‐scattering aerosols from the boundary layer to the lower stratosphere

    J. P. Schwarz;J. P. Schwarz;R. S. Gao;D. W. Fahey;D. W. Fahey;D. S. Thomson;D. S. Thomson

  • Physically based parameterization of cirrus cloud formation for use in global atmospheric models

    B. Kärcher;J. Hendricks;U. Lohmann

  • Global model simulations of the impact of ocean-going ships on aerosols, clouds, and the radiation budget

    Axel Lauer;Veronika Eyring;Johannes Hendricks;Patrick Jöckel

  • The effect of harmonized emissions on aerosol properties in global models – an AeroCom experiment

    C. Textor;M Schulz;S. Guibert;S. Kinne

  • Effects of ice nuclei on cirrus clouds in a global climate model

    Johannes Hendricks;Bernd Kärcher;Ulrike Lohmann

  • Regional and Global Tropopause Fold Occurrence and Related Ozone Flux Across the Tropopause

    M. Beekmann;G. Ancellet;S. Blonsky;D. De Muer

  • Mitigating the Climate Impact from Aviation: Achievements and Results of the DLR WeCare Project

    Volker Grewe;Katrin Dahlmann;Jan Flink;Christine Frömming

  • A new radiation infrastructure for the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy, based on version 2.51)

    Simone Dietmüller;Simone Dietmüller;Patrick Jöckel;Holger Tost;Markus Kunze

  • Do aircraft black carbon emissions affect cirrus clouds on the global scale

    Johannes Hendricks;Bernd Kärcher;Ulrike Lohmann;Michael Ponater

  • Dust ice nuclei effects on cirrus clouds

    M. Kuebbeler;U. Lohmann;J. Hendricks;B. Kärcher

  • Simulating the global atmospheric black carbon cycle: a revisit to the contribution of aircraft emissions

    J. Hendricks;B. Karcher;A. Dopelheuer;Johann Feichter

  • A Climatology of Tropopause Folds by Global Analyses

    Unknown

  • Sensitivity studies of cirrus clouds formed by heterogeneous freezing in the ECHAM GCM

    U. Lohmann;B. Kärcher;J. Hendricks

  • The global impact of the transport sectors on atmospheric aerosol: simulations for year 2000 emissions

    Mattia Righi;Johannes Hendricks;Robert Sausen

  • Perturbation of the European free troposphere aerosol by North American forest fire plumes during the ICARTT-ITOP experiment in summer 2004

    A. Petzold;B. Weinzierl;H. Huntrieser;A. Stohl

  • Simulating aerosol microphysics with the ECHAM/MADE GCM – Part I: Model description and comparison with observations

    A. Lauer;J. Hendricks;I. Ackermann;B. Schell

  • MADE-in : a new aerosol microphysics submodel for global simulation of insoluble particles and their mixing state

    V. Aquila;V. Aquila;J. Hendricks;A. Lauer;N. Riemer

  • Climate impact of biofuels in shipping: global model studies of the aerosol indirect effect.

    Mattia Righi;Carolin Klinger;Veronika Eyring;Johannes Hendricks

  • Mitigation of Non-CO2 Aviation’s Climate Impact by Changing Cruise Altitudes

    Sigrun Matthes;Ling Lim;Ulrike Burkhardt;Katrin Dahlmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Axel Lauer
Axel Lauer German Aerospace Center
Robert Sausen
Robert Sausen German Aerospace Center
Bernd Kärcher
Bernd Kärcher German Aerospace Center
Ulrike Lohmann
Ulrike Lohmann ETH Zurich
Veronika Eyring
Veronika Eyring University of Bremen
Volker Grewe
Volker Grewe German Aerospace Center
Michael Ponater
Michael Ponater German Aerospace Center
Patrick Jöckel
Patrick Jöckel German Aerospace Center
Bernadett Weinzierl
Bernadett Weinzierl University of Vienna
Andreas Minikin
Andreas Minikin German Aerospace Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens up diverse career opportunities that often overlap with fields like sociology and social work. For those interested in understanding the societal impact of environmental issues, pursuing an online sociology degree bachelors can provide valuable insights into community dynamics and policy development.

Professionals aiming to advance their expertise while balancing work and life commitments may consider enrolling in a doctorate degree online no dissertation program. These flexible pathways allow for advanced research and leadership roles without the traditional dissertation requirement, speeding up the time to graduation.

For educators and researchers, transitioning from an EdS to an EdD via an eds to edd bridge program offers a streamlined route to doctoral credentials. This progression supports career growth in academic and administrative roles within environmental education sectors.

Additionally, professionals in social work focusing on environmental justice may find dsw programs beneficial. These programs enhance skills in social policy and advocacy, enabling stronger community impact related to environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Johannes Hendricks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles