World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Woo Jin Hyung

Woo Jin Hyung

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14692 13838 55 53 521 24201

Woo Jin Hyung publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Woo Jin Hyung between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Woo Jin Hyung published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 21.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2014. 41 of the 572 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2014. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 16 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 24 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 31 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 41 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 41 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 35 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 41 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 22 publications
1999 2025

572 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Woo Jin Hyung: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 4
2002 6
2003 3
2004 16
2005 11
2006 11
2007 16
2008 19
2009 24
2010 29
2011 17
2012 31
2013 26
2014 41
2015 31
2016 41
2017 30
2018 30
2019 35
2020 23
2021 41
2022 24
2023 21
2024 19
2025 22
Total 572
Download as CSV

Woo Jin Hyung publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Woo Jin Hyung sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 521–540 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 521 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610 521
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Woo Jin Hyung D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Woo Jin Hyung sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Woo Jin Hyung is affiliated with Yonsei University in South Korea and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly in the field of gastric cancer and related surgical treatments. Their work primarily falls within the broader discipline of Medicine, with notable contributions to subfields such as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Gastroenterology, and Oncology.

The main topics of Woo Jin Hyung's research include:

  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Metastasis and carcinoma case studies
  • Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
  • Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

Their recent academic publications demonstrate a focus on clinical trials and surgical approaches related to gastric cancer. Key recent papers are:

  • Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-02-RCT Randomized Clinical Trial, 2020, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer, 2022, JAMA Surgery
  • MATTERHORN: phase III study of durvalumab plus FLOT chemotherapy in resectable gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer, 2022, Future Oncology
  • Development and validation of a prognostic and predictive 32-gene signature for gastric cancer, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Effect of Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy With Double-Tract Reconstruction vs Total Gastrectomy on Hemoglobin Level and Vitamin B12 Supplementation in Upper-Third Early Gastric Cancer, 2023, JAMA Network Open

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Woo Jin Hyung include:

  • Gyu Seok Cho
  • Hyoung-Il Kim
  • Yoo Min Kim
  • Sung Hyun Park
  • Young-Woo Kim

Woo Jin Hyung's work has been published frequently in the following venues, reflecting consistent contributions to surgical oncology and gastric cancer research:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Journal of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association
  • Scientific Reports
  • Annals of Surgical Oncology
  • European Journal of Surgical Oncology

Best Publications

  • Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial).

    Hyung Ho Kim;Woo Jin Hyung;Gyu Seok Cho;Min Chan Kim

  • Decreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01).

    Wook Kim;Hyung Ho Kim;Sang Uk Han;Min Chan Kim

  • Gastrectomy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer with a single non-curable factor (REGATTA): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial

    Kazumasa Fujitani;Han-Kwang Yang;Junki Mizusawa;Young-Woo Kim

  • Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial

    Hyung Ho Kim;Sang Uk Han;Min Chan Kim;Wook Kim

  • Short-term Outcomes of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy to Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (KLASS-02-RCT).

    Hyuk Joon Lee;Woo Jin Hyung;Han Kwang Yang;Sang Uk Han

  • Long-Term Results of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Large-Scale Case-Control and Case-Matched Korean Multicenter Study

    Hyung Ho Kim;Sang Uk Han;Min Chan Kim;Woo Jin Hyung

  • Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures

    Jyewon Song;Sung Jin Oh;Wook Ho Kang;Woo Jin Hyung

  • Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-02-RCT Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Woo Jin Hyung;Han-Kwang Yang;Young-Kyu Park;Hyuk-Joon Lee

  • Multicenter Prospective Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

    Hyoung Il Kim;Sang Uk Han;Han Kwang Yang;Young Woo Kim

  • Risk factors associated with complication following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale korean multicenter study

    Min Chan Kim;Wook Kim;Hyung Ho Kim;Seung Wan Ryu

  • Microsatellite Instability and Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Expression in Stage II/III Gastric Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of the CLASSIC Randomized Controlled study.

    Yoon Young Choi;Hyunki Kim;Su Jin Shin;Ha Yan Kim

  • CT and PET in Stomach Cancer: Preoperative Staging and Monitoring of Response to Therapy

    Joon Seok Lim;Mi Jin Yun;Myeong Jin Kim;Woo Jin Hyung

  • Robotic gastrectomy as an oncologically sound alternative to laparoscopic resections for the treatment of early-stage gastric cancers.

    Yanghee Woo;Woo Jin Hyung;Kyung Ho Pak;Kazuki Inaba;Kazuki Inaba

  • Lymph Node Staging of Gastric Cancer Using 18F-FDG PET: A Comparison Study with CT

    Mijin Yun;Joon Seok Lim;Sung Hoon Noh;Woo Jin Hyung

  • Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a large-scale multicenter retrospective study

    Do Joong Park;Sang-Uk Han;Woo Jin Hyung;Min Chan Kim

  • The Impact of Comorbidity on Surgical Outcomes in Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Analysis of Multicenter Results

    Wook Kim;Kyo Young Song;Hyuk Joon Lee;Sang Uk Han

  • Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases.

    Jyewon Song;Wook Ho Kang;Sung Jin Oh;Woo Jin Hyung

  • Predictive test for chemotherapy response in resectable gastric cancer: a multi-cohort, retrospective analysis

    Jae Ho Cheong;Han Kwang Yang;Hyunki Kim;Woo Ho Kim

  • Safety and Efficacy of Fast-track Surgery in Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Jong Won Kim;Whan Sik Kim;Jae Ho Cheong;Woo Jin Hyung

  • Application of minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer.

    Woo Jin Hyung;Jae Ho Cheong;Junuk Kim;Jian Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Sung Hoon Noh
Sung Hoon Noh Yonsei University
Sun Young Rha
Sun Young Rha Yonsei University
Hyun Cheol Chung
Hyun Cheol Chung Yonsei University
Myeong-Jin Kim
Myeong-Jin Kim Yonsei University
Byung-Ho Nam
Byung-Ho Nam National Cancer Research Institute, UK
Yuman Fong
Yuman Fong City Of Hope National Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine extends beyond traditional medical degrees. Many students begin by exploring online healthcare programs that offer flexibility and affordability. For those interested in data and technology, health informatics is a fast-growing field that blends healthcare with IT skills, preparing graduates for vital roles in managing patient information and digital records.

Entry-level positions such as medical billing or coding can be another pathway. If you’re looking for affordable certification, check out the cheapest medical coding certification online to quickly enter the healthcare workforce.

For those aiming to advance their careers, nursing is a highly sought-after and versatile option. Programs like the cheapest fnp programs online offer advanced practice degrees, such as becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner, with less financial burden than traditional routes. If you are considering nursing in general, it’s helpful to understand how much is online nursing school to find programs that best fit your budget and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Woo Jin Hyung

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles