World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
32097
World Ranking
13531
National Ranking
44

Woo Ho Kim publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Woo Ho Kim sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 542 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Woo Ho Kim D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Woo Ho Kim sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Woo Ho Kim is affiliated with Seoul National University in South Korea and has contributed extensively to the fields of medicine, biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their research covers several subfields, including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, oncology, molecular biology, immunology, and surgery.

The scientist's work focuses primarily on topics associated with gastric cancer management and outcomes, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, cancer cells and metastasis, and gastrointestinal tumor research and treatment. Additionally, research related to Helicobacter pylori-associated gastroenterology and various cancer research and treatment approaches are notable areas of expertise.

Key recent papers authored by Woo Ho Kim include:

  • SMOC2, an intestinal stem cell marker, is an independent prognostic marker associated with better survival in colorectal cancers, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Predictive biomarkers for 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in gastric cancers via profiling of patient-derived xenografts, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Prediction of TP53 mutations by p53 immunohistochemistry and their prognostic significance in gastric cancer, 2020, Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine
  • RUNX3 methylation drives hypoxia-induced cell proliferation and antiapoptosis in early tumorigenesis, 2020, Cell Death and Differentiation
  • Prognostic Impact of Frozen Section Investigation and Extent of Proximal Safety Margin in Gastric Cancer Resection, 2020, Annals of Surgery

Frequently publishing in notable scientific venues, Woo Ho Kim has contributed multiple articles to the following journals:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Cancer Research
  • Gastroenterology
  • European Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

Woo Ho Kim has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Han-Kwang Yang, Seong-Ho Kong, Hye Seung Lee, Yoonjin Kwak, and Do Joong Park, indicating a network of researchers focusing on related medical and oncological subjects.

Best Publications

  • Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibition in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

    Eunice L. Kwak;Yung-Jue Bang;D. Ross Camidge;Alice T. Shaw

  • Epstein-barr virus-positive gastric carcinoma demonstrates frequent aberrant methylation of multiple genes and constitutes CpG island methylator phenotype-positive gastric carcinoma

    Gyeong Hoon Kang;Sun Lee;Woo Ho Kim;Hye Won Lee

  • Promoter methylation and silencing of PTEN in gastric carcinoma.

    Young-Hwa Kang;Hye Seung Lee;Woo Ho Kim

  • Nomogram Predicting Long-Term Survival After D2 Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

    Dong Seok Han;Yun Suhk Suh;Seong Ho Kong;Hyuk Joon Lee

  • Improved survival of gastric cancer with tumour Epstein-Barr virus positivity: an international pooled analysis.

    M. Constanza Camargo;Woo Ho Kim;Anna Maria Chiaravalli;Kyoung Mee Kim

  • Randomized, Double-Blind Phase II Trial With Prospective Classification by ATM Protein Level to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Olaparib Plus Paclitaxel in Patients With Recurrent or Metastatic Gastric Cancer

    Yung Jue Bang;Seock Ah Im;Keun Wook Lee;Jae Yong Cho

  • Tumour suppressor gene expression correlates with gastric cancer prognosis.

    Hye Seung Lee;Hyeon Kook Lee;Hee Sung Kim;Han Kwang Yang

  • Evaluation of the seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Classification of gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with the sixth classification.

    Hye Seong Ahn;Hyuk Joon Lee;Seokyung Hahn;Woo Ho Kim

  • Microsatellite Instability and Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Expression in Stage II/III Gastric Cancer: Post Hoc Analysis of the CLASSIC Randomized Controlled study.

    Yoon Young Choi;Hyunki Kim;Su Jin Shin;Ha Yan Kim

  • Systemic Gene Therapy with p53 Reduces Growth and Metastases of a Malignant Human Breast Cancer in Nude Mice

    Leslie A. Lesoon-Wood;Woo Ho Kim;Hynda K. Kleinman;Bruce D. Weintraub

  • Expression of mucins and cytokeratins in primary carcinomas of the digestive system

    Min Jong Lee;Hye Seung Lee;Woo Ho Kim;Yunhee Choi

  • Phase II study and biomarker analysis of cetuximab combined with modified FOLFOX6 in advanced gastric cancer.

    Sae-Won Han;Sae-Won Han;Do-Youn Oh;Do-Youn Oh;Seock-Ah Im;Seock-Ah Im;S. R. Park

  • Stage migration effect on survival in gastric cancer surgery with extended lymphadenectomy: the reappraisal of positive lymph node ratio as a proper N-staging.

    Seong Ho Kong;Hyuk-Joon Lee;Hye Seong Ahn;Jong Won Kim

  • Aberrant CpG island methylation of multiple genes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

    Sun Lee;Woo Ho Kim;Hwoon Yong Jung;Moon Ho Yang

  • Predictive test for chemotherapy response in resectable gastric cancer: a multi-cohort, retrospective analysis

    Jae Ho Cheong;Han Kwang Yang;Hyunki Kim;Woo Ho Kim

  • Altered expression and mutation of β-catenin gene in gastric carcinomas and cell lines

    Dong Kyun Woo;Hee Sung Kim;Hye Seung Lee;Young Hwa Kang

  • Anaplastic lymphoma kinase translocation: a predictive biomarker of pemetrexed in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

    Jeong Ok Lee;Tae Min Kim;Tae Min Kim;Se Hoon Lee;Se Hoon Lee;Dong Wan Kim;Dong Wan Kim

  • HER2 Status in Colorectal Cancer: Its Clinical Significance and the Relationship between HER2 Gene Amplification and Expression

    An Na Seo;Yoon Jin Kwak;Duck-Woo Kim;Sung Bum Kang

  • Multicenter Analysis of Clinicopathologic Features of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Tumor of the Pancreas: Is It Possible to Predict the Malignancy Before Surgery?

    Jin Young Jang;Sun Whe Kim;Young Joon Ahn;Yoo Seok Yoon

  • Characterization of cell lines established from human hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Jae-Gahb Park;Jae-Ho Lee;Myung-Soo Kang;Kyu-Joo Park

Frequent Co-Authors

Hye Seung Lee
Hye Seung Lee Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Yung-Jue Bang
Yung-Jue Bang Seoul National University
Seock-Ah Im
Seock-Ah Im Seoul National University Hospital
Jae-Gahb Park
Jae-Gahb Park National Cancer Center
Se-Hoon Lee
Se-Hoon Lee Sungkyunkwan University
Dong-Wan Kim
Dong-Wan Kim Seoul National University Hospital
James R. Goldenring
James R. Goldenring Vanderbilt University
Dae Seog Heo
Dae Seog Heo Seoul National University Hospital
Jong-Wan Park
Jong-Wan Park Seoul National University
Doo Hyun Chung
Doo Hyun Chung Seoul National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in healthcare careers beyond a traditional MD, there are a variety of flexible online degrees and career pathways to consider. Many professionals are opting for specialized programs that offer both affordability and convenience, making it easier to advance your career without putting your life on hold.

Those looking to focus on mental health services may explore psych nurse practitioner programs, which prepare graduates for in-demand roles in psychiatric care. If you're seeking a foundational degree with broad applications in the health sector, the cheapest online health science degree programs are an excellent starting point.

Students aspiring to management or leadership positions should consider the cheapest mha programs online healthcare for an affordable path to a Master of Healthcare Administration. For those pursuing advanced practice nursing, the best online dnp programs offer a practical solution to earning a Doctor of Nursing Practice while balancing work and personal obligations.

These pathways offer diverse opportunities to impact patient care, administration, and healthcare systems in meaningful ways—all accessible through flexible online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Woo Ho Kim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles