World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 77 18561 17438 74 72 278 17816

Jae-Gahb Park publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jae-Gahb Park between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jae-Gahb Park published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2005. 2 of the 283 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2005. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 6 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 27 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1985 2025

283 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jae-Gahb Park: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 3
1988 2
1989 0
1990 3
1991 2
1992 5
1993 1
1994 6
1995 9
1996 5
1997 7
1998 7
1999 12
2000 15
2001 10
2002 15
2003 19
2004 24
2005 27
2006 16
2007 23
2008 14
2009 9
2010 9
2011 9
2012 10
2013 9
2014 2
2015 4
2016 1
2017 1
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
2025 1
Total 283
Download as CSV

Jae-Gahb Park publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jae-Gahb Park sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 261–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 278 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722 278
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jae-Gahb Park D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jae-Gahb Park sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730 77
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jae-Gahb Park is affiliated with Seoul National University in South Korea. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Gastroenterology, Molecular Biology, and Biotechnology.

Their recent publications include the paper titled Prognostic significance of CD8 and TCF1 double positive T cell subset in microsatellite unstable gastric cancer published in 2024 in Scientific Reports. Another publication associated with their frequent collaborator is Microbial Dynamics Across Molecular Subtypes and Prognostic Significance of Lactobacillus in Gastric Cancer, which appeared in 2025 in Cancer Research and Treatment.

Jae-Gahb Park frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Soo Kyung Nam
  • Yoonjin Kwak
  • Seong-Ho Kong
  • Do Joong Park
  • Hyuk-Joon Lee

The main venues for their publications are:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Cancer Research and Treatment

Park's research topics cover several areas related to cancer and gastrointestinal health, including:

  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Cancer Research and Treatments
  • Probiotics and Fermented Foods

Best Publications

  • Genetic instability in pancreatic cancer and poorly differentiated type of gastric cancer.

    Hye-Jung Han;Akio Yanagisawa;Yo Kato;Jae-Gahb Park

  • A Transforming Growth Factor β Receptor Type II Gene Mutation Common in Colon and Gastric but Rare in Endometrial Cancers with Microsatellite Instability

    Lois L. Myeroff;Ramon Parsons;Seong Jin Kim;Lora Hedrick

  • Methylation of the CDH1 promoter as the second genetic hit in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer.

    William M. Grady;Joseph Willis;Parry J. Guilford;Anita K. Dunbier

  • Genetic changes in the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) type II receptor gene in human gastric cancer cells: correlation with sensitivity to growth inhibition by TGF-beta

    Keunchil Park;Seong Jin Kim;Yung Jue Bang;Jae Gahb Park

  • Mutations in Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 and Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 Genes Associated with Human Gastric and Colorectal Cancers

    Jun-Hyeog Jang;Ki-Hyuk Shin;Jae-Gahb Park

  • Nationwide Cancer Incidence in Korea, 1999~2001; First Result Using the National Cancer Incidence Database

    Hai-Rim Shin;Young-Joo Won;Kyu-Won Jung;Hyun-Joo Kong

  • Lateral lymph node metastasis is a major cause of locoregional recurrence in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative resection.

    Tae Hyun Kim;Seung Yong Jeong;Dong Hyun Choi;Dae Yong Kim

  • Characteristics of Cell Lines Established from Human Colorectal Carcinoma

    Jae-Gahb Park;Herbert K. Oie;Paul H. Sugarbaker;Jerry G. Henslee

  • Chemosensitivity Testing of Human Colorectal Carcinoma Cell Lines Using a Tetrazolium-based Colorimetric Assay

    Jae-Gahb Park;Barnett S. Kramer;Seth M. Steinberg;James Carmichael

  • Evaluation of tetrazolium-based semiautomatic colorimetric assay for measurement of human antitumor cytotoxicity.

    Dae Seog Heo;Jae-Gahb Park;Kensaku Hata;Roger Day

  • Identification of Genes with Differential Expression in Acquired Drug-Resistant Gastric Cancer Cells Using High-Density Oligonucleotide Microarrays

    Hio Chung Kang;Il Jin Kim;Jae Hyun Park;Yong Shin

  • Optimal surgery time after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers.

    Seok Byung Lim;Hyo Seong Choi;Seung-Yong Jeong;Dae Yong Kim

  • Prognostic factors in 2230 Korean colorectal cancer patients: analysis of consecutively operated cases.

    Young Jin Park;Kyu Joo Park;Jae-Gahb Park;Kuhn Uk Lee

  • Down-regulation of mitochondrial F1F0-ATP synthase in human colon cancer cells with induced 5-fluorouracil resistance.

    Young-Kyoung Shin;Byong Chul Yoo;Hee Jin Chang;Eunkyung Jeon

  • 2002 annual report of the Korea Central Cancer Registry: based on registered data from 139 hospitals.

    Hai-Rim Shin;Kyu-Won Jung;Young-Joo Won;Jae-Gahb Park

  • Genomic structure of human mismatch repair gene, hMLH1, and its mutation analysis in patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)

    Hye-Jung Han;Masakazu Maruyama;Shozo Baba;Jae-Gahb Park

  • Risk of Gastric Cancer in Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer in Korea

    Young Jin Park;Ki-Hyuk Shin;Jae-Gahb Park

  • Characterization of cell lines established from human hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Jae-Gahb Park;Jae-Ho Lee;Myung-Soo Kang;Kyu-Joo Park

  • Establishment and characterization of human gastric carcinoma cell lines.

    Jae-Gahb Park;Han-Kwang Yang;Woo Ho Kim;June-Key Chung

  • Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis Is a Major Cause of Locoregional Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Curative Resection

    T. Kim;D. Choi;D. Kim;K. Jung

Frequent Co-Authors

Yung-Jue Bang
Yung-Jue Bang Seoul National University
Woo Ho Kim
Woo Ho Kim Seoul National University
Seock-Ah Im
Seock-Ah Im Seoul National University Hospital
Dae Yong Kim
Dae Yong Kim Seoul National University
Adi F. Gazdar
Adi F. Gazdar The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Yusuke Nakamura
Yusuke Nakamura National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition
Henry T. Lynch
Henry T. Lynch Creighton University
Hans F. A. Vasen
Hans F. A. Vasen Leiden University
Juul T. Wijnen
Juul T. Wijnen Leiden University Medical Center
Dong-Young Noh
Dong-Young Noh Seoul National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA can open pathways in diverse healthcare fields. Many students choose alternative degrees that align with their interests, support career advancement, or offer more flexible entry requirements. For those interested in the nursing profession but seeking an accessible route, consider an lpn program without teas test. This option allows you to begin a nursing career without needing standardized entrance exams.

If your ambitions lean toward leadership or hospital management, online healthcare administration programs are an excellent way to gain the skills needed for administrative roles.

Current nurses looking to advance their qualifications might consider asn to fnp programs. These bridge programs help registered nurses move quickly toward becoming Family Nurse Practitioners, opening up more responsibility and greater earning potential.

For those passionate about wellness and food science, pursuing a nutrition bachelor degree online is another excellent choice. This path prepares graduates for impactful roles in dietetics, community health, and patient education.

Best Scientists Citing Jae-Gahb Park

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles