World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
17816
World Ranking
18562
National Ranking
74

Jae-Gahb Park publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jae-Gahb Park sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 278 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jae-Gahb Park D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jae-Gahb Park sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jae-Gahb Park is affiliated with Seoul National University in South Korea. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Gastroenterology, Molecular Biology, and Biotechnology.

Their recent publications include the paper titled Prognostic significance of CD8 and TCF1 double positive T cell subset in microsatellite unstable gastric cancer published in 2024 in Scientific Reports. Another publication associated with their frequent collaborator is Microbial Dynamics Across Molecular Subtypes and Prognostic Significance of Lactobacillus in Gastric Cancer, which appeared in 2025 in Cancer Research and Treatment.

Jae-Gahb Park frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Soo Kyung Nam
  • Yoonjin Kwak
  • Seong-Ho Kong
  • Do Joong Park
  • Hyuk-Joon Lee

The main venues for their publications are:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Cancer Research and Treatment

Park's research topics cover several areas related to cancer and gastrointestinal health, including:

  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Cancer Research and Treatments
  • Probiotics and Fermented Foods

Best Publications

  • Genetic instability in pancreatic cancer and poorly differentiated type of gastric cancer.

    Hye-Jung Han;Akio Yanagisawa;Yo Kato;Jae-Gahb Park

  • A Transforming Growth Factor β Receptor Type II Gene Mutation Common in Colon and Gastric but Rare in Endometrial Cancers with Microsatellite Instability

    Lois L. Myeroff;Ramon Parsons;Seong Jin Kim;Lora Hedrick

  • Methylation of the CDH1 promoter as the second genetic hit in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer.

    William M. Grady;Joseph Willis;Parry J. Guilford;Anita K. Dunbier

  • Genetic changes in the transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) type II receptor gene in human gastric cancer cells: correlation with sensitivity to growth inhibition by TGF-beta

    Keunchil Park;Seong Jin Kim;Yung Jue Bang;Jae Gahb Park

  • Mutations in Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 and Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 3 Genes Associated with Human Gastric and Colorectal Cancers

    Jun-Hyeog Jang;Ki-Hyuk Shin;Jae-Gahb Park

  • Nationwide Cancer Incidence in Korea, 1999~2001; First Result Using the National Cancer Incidence Database

    Hai-Rim Shin;Young-Joo Won;Kyu-Won Jung;Hyun-Joo Kong

  • Lateral lymph node metastasis is a major cause of locoregional recurrence in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative resection.

    Tae Hyun Kim;Seung Yong Jeong;Dong Hyun Choi;Dae Yong Kim

  • Characteristics of Cell Lines Established from Human Colorectal Carcinoma

    Jae-Gahb Park;Herbert K. Oie;Paul H. Sugarbaker;Jerry G. Henslee

  • Chemosensitivity Testing of Human Colorectal Carcinoma Cell Lines Using a Tetrazolium-based Colorimetric Assay

    Jae-Gahb Park;Barnett S. Kramer;Seth M. Steinberg;James Carmichael

  • Evaluation of tetrazolium-based semiautomatic colorimetric assay for measurement of human antitumor cytotoxicity.

    Dae Seog Heo;Jae-Gahb Park;Kensaku Hata;Roger Day

  • Identification of Genes with Differential Expression in Acquired Drug-Resistant Gastric Cancer Cells Using High-Density Oligonucleotide Microarrays

    Hio Chung Kang;Il Jin Kim;Jae Hyun Park;Yong Shin

  • Optimal surgery time after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancers.

    Seok Byung Lim;Hyo Seong Choi;Seung-Yong Jeong;Dae Yong Kim

  • Prognostic factors in 2230 Korean colorectal cancer patients: analysis of consecutively operated cases.

    Young Jin Park;Kyu Joo Park;Jae-Gahb Park;Kuhn Uk Lee

  • Down-regulation of mitochondrial F1F0-ATP synthase in human colon cancer cells with induced 5-fluorouracil resistance.

    Young-Kyoung Shin;Byong Chul Yoo;Hee Jin Chang;Eunkyung Jeon

  • 2002 annual report of the Korea Central Cancer Registry: based on registered data from 139 hospitals.

    Hai-Rim Shin;Kyu-Won Jung;Young-Joo Won;Jae-Gahb Park

  • Genomic structure of human mismatch repair gene, hMLH1, and its mutation analysis in patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)

    Hye-Jung Han;Masakazu Maruyama;Shozo Baba;Jae-Gahb Park

  • Risk of Gastric Cancer in Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer in Korea

    Young Jin Park;Ki-Hyuk Shin;Jae-Gahb Park

  • Characterization of cell lines established from human hepatocellular carcinoma.

    Jae-Gahb Park;Jae-Ho Lee;Myung-Soo Kang;Kyu-Joo Park

  • Establishment and characterization of human gastric carcinoma cell lines.

    Jae-Gahb Park;Han-Kwang Yang;Woo Ho Kim;June-Key Chung

  • Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis Is a Major Cause of Locoregional Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Curative Resection

    T. Kim;D. Choi;D. Kim;K. Jung

Frequent Co-Authors

Yung-Jue Bang
Yung-Jue Bang Seoul National University
Woo Ho Kim
Woo Ho Kim Seoul National University
Seock-Ah Im
Seock-Ah Im Seoul National University Hospital
Dae Yong Kim
Dae Yong Kim Seoul National University
Adi F. Gazdar
Adi F. Gazdar The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Yusuke Nakamura
Yusuke Nakamura National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition
Henry T. Lynch
Henry T. Lynch Creighton University
Hans F. A. Vasen
Hans F. A. Vasen Leiden University
Juul T. Wijnen
Juul T. Wijnen Leiden University Medical Center
Dong-Young Noh
Dong-Young Noh Seoul National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA can open pathways in diverse healthcare fields. Many students choose alternative degrees that align with their interests, support career advancement, or offer more flexible entry requirements. For those interested in the nursing profession but seeking an accessible route, consider an lpn program without teas test. This option allows you to begin a nursing career without needing standardized entrance exams.

If your ambitions lean toward leadership or hospital management, online healthcare administration programs are an excellent way to gain the skills needed for administrative roles.

Current nurses looking to advance their qualifications might consider asn to fnp programs. These bridge programs help registered nurses move quickly toward becoming Family Nurse Practitioners, opening up more responsibility and greater earning potential.

For those passionate about wellness and food science, pursuing a nutrition bachelor degree online is another excellent choice. This path prepares graduates for impactful roles in dietetics, community health, and patient education.

Best Scientists Citing Jae-Gahb Park

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles