World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 43 8039 7812 478 471 124 7039

Paul Marshall publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Paul Marshall between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Paul Marshall published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2009. 26 of the 165 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2009. 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 14 publications
2002 2025

165 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Paul Marshall: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 2
2003 2
2004 2
2005 1
2006 3
2007 4
2008 6
2009 15
2010 7
2011 11
2012 3
2013 14
2014 4
2015 9
2016 11
2017 11
2018 4
2019 4
2020 6
2021 5
2022 8
2023 7
2024 12
2025 14
Total 165
Download as CSV

Paul Marshall publications per year - data summary

  • Paul Marshall, a Computer Science scholar from University of Bristol, has 165 publications recorded across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2002 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2009, with 15 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2005, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 6.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.9 per year counting only the 24 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 46 publications, 28% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2002-2009: 35 publications (4.4 per year); 2010-2017: 70 publications (8.8 per year); 2018-2025: 60 publications (7.5 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Paul Marshall publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Marshall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 122–131 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 124 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544 124
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Paul Marshall publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Paul Marshall, a Computer Science scholar from University of Bristol, records 124 publications - the 16th percentile of the discipline.
  • 16% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Paul Marshall, and about 84% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Paul Marshall ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Paul Marshall D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Marshall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821 43
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Paul Marshall D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Paul Marshall, a Computer Science scholar from University of Bristol, records 43 D-Index - the 46th percentile of the discipline.
  • 46% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Paul Marshall, and about 54% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Paul Marshall ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Paul Marshall is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, predominantly Environmental Science and Social Sciences, with significant contributions to subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

The scientist has authored papers covering a variety of topics including Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies, Marine and Fisheries Research, Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, Ichthyology and Marine Biology, Diabetes Management and Research, Digital Mental Health Interventions, and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction.

Some of the recent publications by Paul Marshall include:

  • 'What lies behind the filter?' Uncovering the motivations for using augmented reality (AR) face filters on social media and their effect on well-being, 2021, Computers in Human Behavior
  • Explainable Machine Learning for Real-Time Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia Prediction and Personalized Control Recommendations, 2022, Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
  • Harnessing the potential of vulnerability assessments for managing social-ecological systems, 2021, Ecology and Society
  • Designing for Care Ecosystems: a Literature Review of Technologies for Children with ADHD, 2022, Interaction Design and Children
  • Co-Designing Personal Health? Multidisciplinary Benefits and Challenges in Informing Diabetes Self-Care Technologies, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Aisling Ann O'Kane
  • Amid Ayobi
  • Jesse E. M. Cochran
  • Michael L. Berumen
  • Collin T. Williams

Paul Marshall's works have appeared repeatedly in several publication venues, notably:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Interaction Design and Children
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research

Best Publications

  • Do tangible interfaces enhance learning

    Paul Marshall

  • Introduction to the special issue on the theory and practice of embodied interaction in HCI and interaction design

    Paul Marshall;Alissa Antle;Elise Van Den Hoven;Yvonne Rogers

  • Collaboration and interference: awareness with mice or touch input

    Eva Hornecker;Paul Marshall;Nick Sheep Dalton;Yvonne Rogers

  • Around the table: are multiple-touch surfaces better than single-touch for children's collaborative interactions?

    Amanda Harris;Jochen Rick;Victoria Bonnett;Nicola Yuill

  • Rethinking 'multi-user': an in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface

    Paul Marshall;Richard Morris;Yvonne Rogers;Stefan Kreitmayer

  • 'What lies behind the filter?' Uncovering the motivations for using augmented reality (AR) face filters on social media and their effect on well-being

    Unknown

  • Activity tracking: barriers, workarounds and customisation

    Daniel Harrison;Paul Marshall;Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze;Jon Bird

  • Ambient influence: can twinkly lights lure and abstract representations trigger behavioral change?

    Yvonne Rogers;William R. Hazlewood;Paul Marshall;Nick Dalton

  • Equal Opportunities: Do Shareable Interfaces Promote More Group Participation Than Single User Displays?

    Yvonne Rogers;Youn-kyung Lim;William R. Hazlewood;Paul Marshall

  • Using F-formations to analyse spatial patterns of interaction in physical environments

    Paul Marshall;Yvonne Rogers;Nadia Pantidi

  • A City in Common: A Framework to Orchestrate Large-scale Citizen Engagement around Urban Issues

    Mara Balestrini;Yvonne Rogers;Carolyn Hassan;Javi Creus

  • Actions speak loudly with words: unpacking collaboration around the table

    Rowanne Fleck;Yvonne Rogers;Nicola Yuill;Paul Marshall

  • Quantifying the Body and Caring for the Mind: Self-Tracking in Multiple Sclerosis

    Amid Ayobi;Paul Marshall;Anna L. Cox;Yunan Chen

  • Conceptualising tangibles to support learning

    Paul Marshall;Sara Price;Yvonne Rogers

  • Gestural interaction on the steering wheel: reducing the visual demand

    Tanja Döring;Dagmar Kern;Paul Marshall;Max Pfeiffer

  • Children designing together on a multi-touch tabletop: an analysis of spatial orientation and user interactions

    Jochen Rick;Amanda Harris;Paul Marshall;Rowanne Fleck

  • From entry to access: how shareability comes about

    Eva Hornecker;Paul Marshall;Yvonne Rogers

  • Flexible and Mindful Self-Tracking: Design Implications from Paper Bullet Journals

    Amid Ayobi;Tobias Sonne;Paul Marshall;Anna L. Cox

  • Beyond one-size-fits-all: how interactive tabletops support collaborative learning

    Jochen Rick;Paul Marshall;Nicola Yuill

  • When the fingers do the talking: A study of group participation with varying constraints to a tabletop interface

    P. Marshall;E. Hornecker;R. Morris;N. Sheep Dalton

  • Gestural interaction on the steering wheel: reducing the visual demand

    T Döring;D Kern;P Marshall;M Pfeiffer

Frequent Co-Authors

Yvonne Rogers
Yvonne Rogers University College London
Eva Hornecker
Eva Hornecker Bauhaus University, Weimar
Anna L. Cox
Anna L. Cox University College London
Nicola Yuill
Nicola Yuill University of Sussex
Alissa N. Antle
Alissa N. Antle Simon Fraser University
Kaj Grønbæk
Kaj Grønbæk Aarhus University
Ann Blandford
Ann Blandford University College London
Licia Capra
Licia Capra University College London
Peter A. Flach
Peter A. Flach University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring your options for studying Computer Science in the USA? Online degree programs offer flexibility and accessibility for students worldwide. If you're starting your journey or looking for foundational knowledge, earning an associate degree online can be a valuable first step.

Budget is an important consideration for many students. When searching for the cheapest online degrees, look for accredited institutions that balance affordability with academic quality. This ensures you receive a recognized qualification without unnecessary debt.

Worried about GPA requirements? There are excellent universities for low gpa applicants, making higher education more accessible for those with non-traditional academic backgrounds.

Finally, consider how your degree aligns with potential careers. For example, if you're interested in broader fields, there are many jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree backgrounds, which highlights the range of opportunities available with online qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Marshall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles