World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
7039
World Ranking
8039
National Ranking
478

Paul Marshall publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Marshall sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 124 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Paul Marshall D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Marshall sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Marshall is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, predominantly Environmental Science and Social Sciences, with significant contributions to subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

The scientist has authored papers covering a variety of topics including Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies, Marine and Fisheries Research, Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, Ichthyology and Marine Biology, Diabetes Management and Research, Digital Mental Health Interventions, and Innovative Human-Technology Interaction.

Some of the recent publications by Paul Marshall include:

  • 'What lies behind the filter?' Uncovering the motivations for using augmented reality (AR) face filters on social media and their effect on well-being, 2021, Computers in Human Behavior
  • Explainable Machine Learning for Real-Time Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia Prediction and Personalized Control Recommendations, 2022, Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
  • Harnessing the potential of vulnerability assessments for managing social-ecological systems, 2021, Ecology and Society
  • Designing for Care Ecosystems: a Literature Review of Technologies for Children with ADHD, 2022, Interaction Design and Children
  • Co-Designing Personal Health? Multidisciplinary Benefits and Challenges in Informing Diabetes Self-Care Technologies, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Aisling Ann O'Kane
  • Amid Ayobi
  • Jesse E. M. Cochran
  • Michael L. Berumen
  • Collin T. Williams

Paul Marshall's works have appeared repeatedly in several publication venues, notably:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Interaction Design and Children
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research

Best Publications

  • Do tangible interfaces enhance learning

    Paul Marshall

  • Introduction to the special issue on the theory and practice of embodied interaction in HCI and interaction design

    Paul Marshall;Alissa Antle;Elise Van Den Hoven;Yvonne Rogers

  • Collaboration and interference: awareness with mice or touch input

    Eva Hornecker;Paul Marshall;Nick Sheep Dalton;Yvonne Rogers

  • Around the table: are multiple-touch surfaces better than single-touch for children's collaborative interactions?

    Amanda Harris;Jochen Rick;Victoria Bonnett;Nicola Yuill

  • Rethinking 'multi-user': an in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface

    Paul Marshall;Richard Morris;Yvonne Rogers;Stefan Kreitmayer

  • 'What lies behind the filter?' Uncovering the motivations for using augmented reality (AR) face filters on social media and their effect on well-being

    Unknown

  • Activity tracking: barriers, workarounds and customisation

    Daniel Harrison;Paul Marshall;Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze;Jon Bird

  • Ambient influence: can twinkly lights lure and abstract representations trigger behavioral change?

    Yvonne Rogers;William R. Hazlewood;Paul Marshall;Nick Dalton

  • Equal Opportunities: Do Shareable Interfaces Promote More Group Participation Than Single User Displays?

    Yvonne Rogers;Youn-kyung Lim;William R. Hazlewood;Paul Marshall

  • Using F-formations to analyse spatial patterns of interaction in physical environments

    Paul Marshall;Yvonne Rogers;Nadia Pantidi

  • A City in Common: A Framework to Orchestrate Large-scale Citizen Engagement around Urban Issues

    Mara Balestrini;Yvonne Rogers;Carolyn Hassan;Javi Creus

  • Actions speak loudly with words: unpacking collaboration around the table

    Rowanne Fleck;Yvonne Rogers;Nicola Yuill;Paul Marshall

  • Quantifying the Body and Caring for the Mind: Self-Tracking in Multiple Sclerosis

    Amid Ayobi;Paul Marshall;Anna L. Cox;Yunan Chen

  • Conceptualising tangibles to support learning

    Paul Marshall;Sara Price;Yvonne Rogers

  • Gestural interaction on the steering wheel: reducing the visual demand

    Tanja Döring;Dagmar Kern;Paul Marshall;Max Pfeiffer

  • Children designing together on a multi-touch tabletop: an analysis of spatial orientation and user interactions

    Jochen Rick;Amanda Harris;Paul Marshall;Rowanne Fleck

  • From entry to access: how shareability comes about

    Eva Hornecker;Paul Marshall;Yvonne Rogers

  • Flexible and Mindful Self-Tracking: Design Implications from Paper Bullet Journals

    Amid Ayobi;Tobias Sonne;Paul Marshall;Anna L. Cox

  • Beyond one-size-fits-all: how interactive tabletops support collaborative learning

    Jochen Rick;Paul Marshall;Nicola Yuill

  • When the fingers do the talking: A study of group participation with varying constraints to a tabletop interface

    P. Marshall;E. Hornecker;R. Morris;N. Sheep Dalton

  • Gestural interaction on the steering wheel: reducing the visual demand

    T Döring;D Kern;P Marshall;M Pfeiffer

Frequent Co-Authors

Yvonne Rogers
Yvonne Rogers University College London
Eva Hornecker
Eva Hornecker Bauhaus University, Weimar
Anna L. Cox
Anna L. Cox University College London
Nicola Yuill
Nicola Yuill University of Sussex
Alissa N. Antle
Alissa N. Antle Simon Fraser University
Kaj Grønbæk
Kaj Grønbæk Aarhus University
Ann Blandford
Ann Blandford University College London
Licia Capra
Licia Capra University College London
Peter A. Flach
Peter A. Flach University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring your options for studying Computer Science in the USA? Online degree programs offer flexibility and accessibility for students worldwide. If you're starting your journey or looking for foundational knowledge, earning an associate degree online can be a valuable first step.

Budget is an important consideration for many students. When searching for the cheapest online degrees, look for accredited institutions that balance affordability with academic quality. This ensures you receive a recognized qualification without unnecessary debt.

Worried about GPA requirements? There are excellent universities for low gpa applicants, making higher education more accessible for those with non-traditional academic backgrounds.

Finally, consider how your degree aligns with potential careers. For example, if you're interested in broader fields, there are many jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree backgrounds, which highlights the range of opportunities available with online qualifications.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Marshall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles