World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
61
Citations
14286
World Ranking
3086
National Ranking
184

Ann Blandford publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Blandford sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 447 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ann Blandford D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ann Blandford sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ann Blandford is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and health professions, with a particular focus on technology-enabled health interventions and public health.

Their primary fields of study include Medicine and Health Professions, with subfields such as General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Psychology, Ophthalmology, and Infectious Diseases.

The main topics addressed in their work cover:

  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions

Ann Blandford has contributed to various publication venues, including:

  • BMJ Open
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Digital Health
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • JMIR Formative Research

Some of the recent papers featuring or relating to their research include:

  • Opportunities and challenges for telehealth within, and beyond, a pandemic, 2020, The Lancet Global Health
  • Impact of fatigue as the primary determinant of functional limitations among patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome: a cross-sectional observational study, 2023, BMJ Open
  • Patient Work and Their Contexts: Scoping Review, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Dimensions of ecological validity for usability evaluations in clinical settings, 2020, Journal of Biomedical Informatics
  • Home-Based Intervention to Test and Start (HITS): a community-randomized controlled trial to increase HIV testing uptake among men in rural South Africa, 2021, Journal of the International AIDS Society

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Blandford's notable co-authors include:

  • Fiona Stevenson
  • Amitava Banerjee
  • David Sunkersing
  • Konstantinos Balaskas
  • Mel Ramasawmy

Best Publications

  • Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis.

    Olga Perski;Ann Blandford;Robert West;Susan Michie

  • Understanding and Promoting Effective Engagement With Digital Behavior Change Interventions

    Lucy Yardley;Bonnie J. Spring;Heleen Riper;Leanne G. Morrison

  • Four Easy Pieces for Assessing the Usability of Multimodal Interaction: The Care Properties

    Joëlle Coutaz;Laurence Nigay;Daniel Salber;Ann Blandford

  • Semi-structured qualitative studies

    AE Blandford

  • Beyond Self-Tracking and Reminders: Designing Smartphone Apps That Support Habit Formation

    Katarzyna Stawarz;Anna L. Cox;Ann Blandford

  • Situation awareness in emergency medical dispatch

    Ann Blandford;B. L. William Wong

  • Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science

    Alexandra Eveleigh;Charlene Jennett;Ann Blandford;Philip Brohan

  • Coming across information serendipitously - Part 1: A process model

    Stephann Makri;Ann Blandford

  • DiCoT: A methodology for applying Distributed Cognition to the design of teamworking systems

    Ann Blandford;Dominic Furniss

  • Qualitative HCI Research: Going Behind the Scenes

    Ann Blandford;Dominic Furniss;Stephann Makri

  • Don't forget your pill!: designing effective medication reminder apps that support users' daily routines

    Katarzyna Stawarz;Anna L. Cox;Ann Blandford

  • Seven lessons for interdisciplinary research on interactive digital health interventions

    Ann Blandford;Jo Gibbs;Nikki Newhouse;Olga Perski

  • “Making my own luck”: Serendipity strategies and how to support them in digital information environments

    Stephann Makri;Ann Blandford;Mel Woods;Sarah Sharples

  • Investigating the information-seeking behaviour of academic lawyers: From Ellis's model to design

    Stephann Makri;Ann Blandford;Anna L. Cox

  • Group and Individual Time Management Tools: What You Get is Not What You Need

    A. E. Blandford;T. R. G. Green

  • Understanding emergency medical dispatch in terms of distributed cognition: a case study.

    Dominic Furniss;Ann Blandford

  • Cognitive economy and satisficing in information seeking: A longitudinal study of undergraduate information behavior

    Claire Warwick;Jon Rimmer;Ann Blandford;Jeremy Gow

  • Interacting with Information

    Ann Blandford;Simon Attfield

  • Information seeking by humanities scholars

    George Buchanan;Sally Jo Cunningham;Ann Blandford;Jon Rimmer

  • A resilience markers framework for small teams

    Dominic Furniss;Jonathan Back;Ann Blandford;Michael Hildebrandt

Frequent Co-Authors

Anna L. Cox
Anna L. Cox University College London
Paul Cairns
Paul Cairns University of York
Harold Thimbleby
Harold Thimbleby Swansea University
Susan Michie
Susan Michie University College London
Robert West
Robert West University College London
Janet Seeley
Janet Seeley London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Matt Jones
Matt Jones Swansea University
David W. Bates
David W. Bates Brigham and Women's Hospital
Frank Tanser
Frank Tanser University of Lincoln
Lucy Yardley
Lucy Yardley University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can dramatically expand your opportunities within the computer science field. Many students consider computer science one of the best majors for the future due to high demand across industries. Related fields like data science, information systems, or cybersecurity can also unlock lucrative career options.

If you’re seeking to advance quickly, there are flexible options available. Some programs are recognized as the easiest online master's degree paths, combining manageable coursework with shorter completion times. For those considering academic research or university-level teaching, pursuing one of the cheapest online phd programs in usa can make advanced credentials more accessible.

If your interests lie in educational management or leadership, you might also explore the cheapest online doctorate in educational leadership programs. These quick and affordable paths can help you shift into administrative or supervisory roles in academic settings related to technology or STEM fields.

Best Scientists Citing Ann Blandford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles