World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
15208
World Ranking
3789
National Ranking
14

Kasper Hornbæk publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kasper Hornbæk sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 233 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kasper Hornbæk D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kasper Hornbæk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kasper Hornbæk is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark. Their research spans multiple areas within computer science, neuroscience, and psychology, with a particular emphasis on human-computer interaction and cognitive neuroscience.

Their recent scholarly publications include:

  • SMELL SPACE, 2020, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • Frustration: Still a Common User Experience, 2023, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Effectiveness of Body Ownership Illusions in Virtual Reality, 2023, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • DIRA: A model of the user interface, 2024, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • The sense of agency in emerging technologies for human-computer integration: A review, 2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience

Frequent co-authors working alongside Kasper Hornbæk include:

  • Joanna Bergström
  • Tor-Salve Dalsgaard
  • Hasti Seifi
  • Andreea Muresan
  • Marianna Obrist

The main fields of study in their body of work cover:

  • Computer Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Within these broad areas, their subfield specializations comprise:

  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Social Psychology
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Kasper Hornbæk's research topics frequently focus on:

  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Color perception and design

They have published extensively in several academic venues, notably:

  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Best Publications

  • Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research

    Kasper Hornbæk

  • Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated?

    Erik Frøkjær;Morten Hertzum;Kasper Hornbæk

  • Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: a critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience

    Javier A. Bargas-Avila;Kasper Hornbæk

  • Opportunities and Challenges for Data Physicalization

    Yvonne Jansen;Pierre Dragicevic;Petra Isenberg;Jason Alexander

  • Shape-changing interfaces: a review of the design space and open research questions

    Majken K. Rasmussen;Esben W. Pedersen;Marianne G. Petersen;Kasper Hornbæk

  • Is beautiful really usable? Toward understanding the relation between usability, aesthetics, and affect in HCI

    Alexandre N. Tuch;Sandra P. Roth;Kasper HornbæK;Klaus Opwis

  • Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measures

    Kasper Hornbæk;Effie Lai-Chong Law

  • Navigation patterns and usability of zoomable user interfaces with and without an overview

    Kasper Hornbæk;Benjamin B. Bederson;Catherine Plaisant

  • What do usability evaluators do in practice?: an explorative study of think-aloud testing

    Mie Nørgaard;Kasper Hornbæk

  • Technology Acceptance and User Experience: A Review of the Experiential Component in HCI

    Kasper Hornbæk;Morten Hertzum

  • HCI Research as Problem-Solving

    Antti Oulasvirta;Kasper Hornbæk

  • Grand Challenges in Shape-Changing Interface Research

    Jason Alexander;Anne Roudaut;Jürgen Steimle;Kasper Hornbæk

  • What Is Interaction

    Kasper Hornbæk;Antti Oulasvirta

  • Reading of electronic documents: the usability of linear, fisheye, and overview+detail interfaces

    Kasper Hornbæk;Erik Frøkjær

  • Cultural cognition in usability evaluation

    Torkil Clemmensen;Morten Hertzum;Kasper Hornbæk;Qingxin Shi

  • Vulture: a mid-air word-gesture keyboard

    Anders Markussen;Mikkel Rønne Jakobsen;Kasper Hornbæk

  • Exploring Interactions with Physically Dynamic Bar Charts

    Faisal Taher;John Hardy;Abhijit Karnik;Christian Weichel

  • Comparing usability problems and redesign proposals as input to practical systems development

    Kasper Hornbæk;Erik Frøkjær

  • Opportunities for odor: experiences with smell and implications for technology

    Marianna Obrist;Alexandre N. Tuch;Kasper Hornbaek

  • Analyzing users' narratives to understand experience with interactive products

    Alexandre N. Tuch;Rune Trusell;Kasper Hornbæk

  • Dogmas in the assessment of usability evaluation methods

    Kasper Hornbæk

  • Reading patterns and usability in visualizations of electronic documents

    Kasper Hornbæk;Erik Frøkjær

  • Navigation Patterns and Usability of Zoomable User Interfaces with and without an Overview

    Kasper Hornbæk

Frequent Co-Authors

Morten Hertzum
Morten Hertzum Roskilde University
Sebastian Boring
Sebastian Boring Aalborg University
Jason Alexander
Jason Alexander University of Bath
Sriram Subramanian
Sriram Subramanian University College London
Azam Khan
Azam Khan Trax.co
Jürgen Steimle
Jürgen Steimle Saarland University
Marianna Obrist
Marianna Obrist University College London
Mikael B. Skov
Mikael B. Skov Aalborg University
Pierre Dragicevic
Pierre Dragicevic French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
John Hardy
John Hardy University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of related career pathways. Many students consider complementary fields that can boost their versatility in tech-driven industries. For example, cybersecurity roles often intersect with the legal system, making a cheapest online criminal justice degree a practical addition for those interested in digital forensics or information security.

For those leaning toward the business side, understanding the cost of accounting degree online can be valuable, especially if you aim to combine computer science skills with finance or auditing. Specializing in data analytics? Pursuing the cheapest masters in data science can set you up for high-demand roles in big data, analytics, or machine learning.

Tech professionals are increasingly sought after in industries like construction. Consider a 2 year construction management degree online to gain project management and technical skills essential for smart infrastructure projects. Each pathway offers affordable and flexible options tailored to different interests alongside your computer science studies.

Best Scientists Citing Kasper Hornbæk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles