World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
9146
World Ranking
8691
National Ranking
430

Sebastian Möller publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sebastian Möller sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 541 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sebastian Möller D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sebastian Möller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sebastian Möller is affiliated with the Technical University of Berlin in Germany. Their primary research area is Computer Science, with a focus on several specialized subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction, Signal Processing, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics, reflecting a diverse research portfolio. These topics include:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Sebastian Möller are:

  • Jan-Niklas Voigt-Antons
  • Tanja Kojić
  • Roland Roller
  • Vera Schmitt
  • Maurizio Vergari

Their publications often appear in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Frontiers in Virtual Reality
  • Healthcare
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Sebastian Möller include:

  • QUALINET White Paper on Definitions of Immersive Media Experience (IMEx), 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • NDNetGaming - development of a no-reference deep CNN for gaming video quality prediction, 2020, Multimedia Tools and Applications
  • ConferencingSpeech 2022 Challenge: Non-intrusive Objective Speech Quality Assessment (NISQA) Challenge for Online Conferencing Applications, 2022, Interspeech 2022
  • How good are virtual hands? Influences of input modality on motor tasks in virtual reality, 2023, Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • Estimation of the Quality of Experience During Video Streaming From Facial Expression and Gaze Direction, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management

Sebastian Möller has contributed to books published primarily by Springer Science+Business Media and Springer Nature. Titles include:

  • Communications, Signal Processing, and Systems, 2022
  • Sensing Technology, 2022
  • Recent Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, 2022
  • Klinische Entscheidungsfindung mit Künstlicher Intelligenz, 2023

Best Publications

  • Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience

    Kjell Brunnström;Sergio Ariel Beker;Katrien de Moor;Ann Dooms

  • Assessment and Prediction of Speech Quality in Telecommunications

    Sebastian Möller

  • I'm home: Defining and evaluating a gesture set for smart-home control

    Christine Kühnel;Tilo Westermann;Fabian Hemmert;Sven G. Kratz

  • On the need for different security methods on mobile phones

    Noam Ben-Asher;Niklas Kirschnick;Hanul Sieger;Joachim Meyer

  • A taxonomy of quality of service and Quality of Experience of multimodal human-machine interaction

    Sebastian Moller;Klaus-Peter Engelbrecht;Christine Kuhnel;Ina Wechsung

  • Speech Quality Estimation: Models and Trends

    S. Moller;Wai-Yip Chan;Nicolas Cote;Tiago H. Falk

  • QoE beyond the MOS: an in-depth look at QoE via better metrics and their relation to MOS

    Tobias Hoßfeld;Poul E. Heegaard;Martín Varela;Sebastian Möller

  • Quality of Experience

    Sebastian Möller;Alexander Raake

  • NISQA: A Deep CNN-Self-Attention Model for Multidimensional Speech Quality Prediction with Crowdsourced Datasets

    Gabriel Mittag;Babak Naderi;Assmaa Chehadi;Sebastian Möller

  • Identity theft, computers and behavioral biometrics

    Robert Moskovitch;Clint Feher;Arik Messerman;Niklas Kirschnick

  • Impairment Factor Framework for Wide-Band Speech Codecs

    S. Moller;A. Raake;N. Kitawaki;A. Takahashi

  • Automatically Assessing Personality from Speech

    Tim Polzehl;Sebastian Moller;Florian Metze

  • T-V-model: Parameter-based prediction of IPTV quality

    A. Raake;M.N. Garcia;S. Moller;J. Berger

  • Quality of Telephone-Based Spoken Dialogue Systems

    Unknown

  • Memo: towards automatic usability evaluation of spoken dialogue services by user error simulations.

    Sebastian Möller;Roman Englert;Klaus-Peter Engelbrecht;Verena Vanessa Hafner

  • Evaluating spoken dialogue systems according to de-facto standards: A case study

    Sebastian Möller;Paula M. T. Smeele;Heleen Boland;Jan Felix Krebber

  • Analyzing Speech Quality Perception Using Electroencephalography

    J-N Antons;R. Schleicher;S. Arndt;S. Moller

  • Quality Dimensions of Narrowband and Wideband Speech Transmission

    M. Wältermann;A. Raake;S. Möller

  • Analysis of infant cries for the early detection of hearing impairment

    Sebastian Möller;Rainer Schönweiler

  • Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation

    Sebastian Möller;Florian Gödde;Maria Wolters

  • Formal Definition of QoE Metrics.

    Tobias Hoßfeld;Poul E. Heegaard;Martín Varela;Sebastian Möller

  • Developers Deserve Security Warnings, Too: On the Effect of Integrated Security Advice on Cryptographic {API} Misuse

    Peter Leo Gorski;Luigi Lo Iacono;Dominik Wermke;Christian Stransky

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Raake
Alexander Raake Ilmenau University of Technology
Tiago H. Falk
Tiago H. Falk Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Florian Metze
Florian Metze Carnegie Mellon University
Gabriel Curio
Gabriel Curio Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Maria G. Martini
Maria G. Martini Kingston University
Carsten Griwodz
Carsten Griwodz University of Oslo
Michael Wagner
Michael Wagner University of Canberra
Tobias Hoßfeld
Tobias Hoßfeld University of Würzburg
Raimund Schatz
Raimund Schatz Austrian Institute of Technology
Gerhard Schmidt
Gerhard Schmidt Kiel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open new doors for those interested in Computer Science. Programs such as an electrical engineering degree online admissions offer a flexible pathway to expand your expertise in technology and engineering fields while studying remotely.

For those seeking to maximize value, consider programs recognized among the cheapest master in data science options. These affordable choices can help you build in-demand analytical skills and enter high-growth tech careers without breaking the bank.

If you want to boost your credentials quickly, there are fastest online master's degree options designed for working professionals who need flexibility and speed.

Finally, pursuing easy certifications to get can provide a fast track to improve your resume and earning power. These short-term programs are ideal for gaining specialized skills and quickly entering the job market.

Exploring these online degrees and certifications can help you create a personalized career pathway in the ever-evolving technology landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Sebastian Möller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles