World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matt Welsh

Matt Welsh

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
64
Citations
36112
World Ranking
2510
National Ranking
1252

Matt Welsh publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matt Welsh sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 141 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Matt Welsh D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matt Welsh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Matt Welsh is affiliated with Fixie.ai in the United States. Their research contributions include publications in notable venues such as Communications of the ACM and arXiv (Cornell University).

Some of Welsh's recent papers include:

  • The End of Programming, 2022, Communications of the ACM
  • The Design of an LLM-powered Unstructured Analytics System, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)

Throughout their work, Welsh has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Eric Anderson
  • Jonathan Fritz
  • Austin Lee
  • Bohou Li
  • Mark Lindblad

Welsh's professional recognition includes the award of ACM Senior Member in 2009.

Best Publications

  • TOSSIM: accurate and scalable simulation of entire TinyOS applications

    Philip Levis;Nelson Lee;Matt Welsh;David Culler

  • The nesC language: a holistic approach to networked embedded systems

    Philip Levis;Robert von Behren;Matt Welsh

  • TinyOS: An Operating System for Sensor Networks

    Philip Alexander Levis;Samuel Madden;Joseph Polastre;Robert Szewczyk

  • Deploying a wireless sensor network on an active volcano

    G. Werner-Allen;K. Lorincz;M. Ruiz;O. Marcillo

  • The nesC language: A holistic approach to networked embedded systems

    Unknown

  • Simulating the power consumption of large-scale sensor network applications

    Victor Shnayder;Mark Hempstead;Bor-rong Chen;Geoff Werner Allen

  • Sensor networks for emergency response: challenges and opportunities

    K. Lorincz;D.J. Malan;T.R.F. Fulford-Jones;A. Nawoj

  • SEDA: an architecture for well-conditioned, scalable internet services

    Matt Welsh;David Culler;Eric Brewer

  • CodeBlue: An Ad Hoc Sensor Network Infrastructure for Emergency Medical Care

    David J. Malan;Thaddeus Fulford-Jones;Matt Welsh;Steve Moulton

  • A public-key infrastructure for key distribution in TinyOS based on elliptic curve cryptography

    D.J. Malan;M. Welsh;M.D. Smith

  • Sensor networks for medical care

    Victor Shnayder;Bor-rong Chen;Konrad Lorincz;Thaddeus R. F. Fulford Jones

  • Wireless Sensor Networks for Healthcare

    JeongGil Ko;Chenyang Lu;Mani B Srivastava;John A Stankovic

  • Fidelity and yield in a volcano monitoring sensor network

    Geoff Werner-Allen;Konrad Lorincz;Jeff Johnson;Jonathan Lees

  • MoteLab: a wireless sensor network testbed

    Geoffrey Werner-Allen;Patrick Swieskowski;Matt Welsh

  • Monitoring volcanic eruptions with a wireless sensor network

    G. Werner-Allen;J. Johnson;M. Ruiz;J. Lees

  • Monitoring Motor Fluctuations in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Using Wearable Sensors

    S. Patel;K. Lorincz;R. Hughes;N. Huggins

  • Vital Signs Monitoring and Patient Tracking Over a Wireless Network

    Tia Gao;D. Greenspan;M. Welsh;R. Juang

  • MoteTrack: a robust, decentralized approach to RF-based location tracking

    Konrad Lorincz;Matt Welsh

  • Programming sensor networks using abstract regions

    Matt Welsh;Geoff Mainland

  • Network-Aware Operator Placement for Stream-Processing Systems

    P. Pietzuch;J. Ledlie;J. Shneidman;M. Roussopoulos

  • White space networking with wi-fi like connectivity

    Paramvir Bahl;Ranveer Chandra;Thomas Moscibroda;Rohan Murty

Frequent Co-Authors

David E. Culler
David E. Culler University of California, Berkeley
Eric Brewer
Eric Brewer University of California, Berkeley
Paolo Bonato
Paolo Bonato Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Margo Seltzer
Margo Seltzer University of British Columbia
Peter Pietzuch
Peter Pietzuch Imperial College London
Jeffrey B. Johnson
Jeffrey B. Johnson Boise State University
Mario Ruiz
Mario Ruiz National Polytechnic School
S. Sitharama Iyengar
S. Sitharama Iyengar Florida International University
Viktor K. Prasanna
Viktor K. Prasanna University of Southern California
Paul G. Spirakis
Paul G. Spirakis University of Liverpool

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape for technology and engineering education is changing rapidly, with many students now considering flexible online degree options. Choosing the right online program is crucial, as it determines not only the cost and convenience but also the quality of your learning experience and career outcomes.

If you're aiming for a tech-driven career, a computer science degree online offers a strong foundation in programming, software development, and algorithms. For those interested in sustainability or infrastructure, an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering could open doors to vital roles in environmental analysis, policy, or renewable energy sectors.

Cost is also a major factor for many students. Exploring the cheapest mechanical engineering degree online programs allows you to save on tuition while gaining practical skills in mechanics, materials, and design. If your passion lies in scientific discovery, pursuing the best online physics degree can open up pathways in research, data analysis, and education.

Online science and engineering degrees not only expand your academic options but also offer flexible career pathways, allowing you to learn and advance at your own pace.

Best Scientists Citing Matt Welsh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles