World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
11019
World Ranking
7824
National Ranking
3384

Kamin Whitehouse publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kamin Whitehouse sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 145 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Kamin Whitehouse D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kamin Whitehouse sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kamin Whitehouse is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States, where their research spans several areas within engineering, particularly focusing on electrical and electronic engineering as well as ocean engineering.

Their work covers multiple topics including:

  • Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
  • Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
  • Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems

Whitehouse's recent scholarly output includes the paper titled TagFi, published in 2021 in the Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. This work is documented with 29 citations and was authored jointly with Elahe Soltanaghaei.

Collaborations have been established with several researchers, some of the more frequent coauthors being:

  • Elahe Soltanaghaei
  • Adwait Dongare
  • Akarsh Prabhakara
  • Swarun Kumar
  • Anthony Rowe

Whitehouse's publications are concentrated in venues such as the Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive Mobile Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, reflecting their focus on mobile, wearable, and ubiquitous computing applications within their engineering disciplines.

Best Publications

  • TinyOS: An Operating System for Sensor Networks

    Philip Alexander Levis;Samuel Madden;Joseph Polastre;Robert Szewczyk

  • The smart thermostat: using occupancy sensors to save energy in homes

    Jiakang Lu;Tamim Sookoor;Vijay Srinivasan;Ge Gao

  • Calibration as parameter estimation in sensor networks

    Kamin Whitehouse;David Culler

  • Hood: a neighborhood abstraction for sensor networks

    Kamin Whitehouse;Cory Sharp;Eric Brewer;David Culler

  • A practical evaluation of radio signal strength for ranging-based localization

    Kamin Whitehouse;Chris Karlof;David Culler

  • Trio: enabling sustainable and scalable outdoor wireless sensor network deployments

    Prabal Dutta;Jonathan Hui;Jaein Jeong;Sukun Kim

  • Exploiting the capture effect for collision detection and recovery

    K. Whitehouse;A. Woo;F. Jiang;J. Polastre

  • Brick: Towards a Unified Metadata Schema For Buildings

    Bharathan Balaji;Arka Bhattacharya;Gabriel Fierro;Jingkun Gao

  • Semantic streams: a framework for composable semantic interpretation of sensor data

    Kamin Whitehouse;Feng Zhao;Jie Liu

  • Brick : metadata schema for portable smart building applications

    Bharathan Balaji;Arka Bhattacharya;Gabriel Fierro;Jingkun Gao

  • Marionette: using RPC for interactive development and debugging of wireless embedded networks

    Kamin Whitehouse;Gilman Tolle;Jay Taneja;Cory Sharp

  • The effects of ranging noise on multihop localization: an empirical study

    Kamin Whitehouse;Chris Karlof;Alec Woo;Fred Jiang

  • Clairvoyant: a comprehensive source-level debugger for wireless sensor networks

    Jing Yang;Mary Lou Soffa;Leo Selavo;Kamin Whitehouse

  • The hitchhiker's guide to successful residential sensing deployments

    Timothy W. Hnat;Vijay Srinivasan;Jiakang Lu;Tamim I. Sookoor

  • Multipath Triangulation: Decimeter-level WiFi Localization and Orientation with a Single Unaided Receiver

    Elahe Soltanaghaei;Avinash Kalyanaraman;Kamin Whitehouse

  • The self-programming thermostat: optimizing setback schedules based on home occupancy patterns

    Ge Gao;Kamin Whitehouse

  • Protecting your daily in-home activity information from a wireless snooping attack

    Vijay Srinivasan;John Stankovic;Kamin Whitehouse

  • Flash Flooding: Exploiting the Capture Effect for Rapid Flooding in Wireless Sensor Networks

    J. Lu;K. Whitehouse

  • Doorjamb: unobtrusive room-level tracking of people in homes using doorway sensors

    Timothy W. Hnat;Erin Griffiths;Ray Dawson;Kamin Whitehouse

  • Declarative tracepoints: a programmable and application independent debugging system for wireless sensor networks

    Qing Cao;Tarek Abdelzaher;John Stankovic;Kamin Whitehouse

Frequent Co-Authors

John A. Stankovic
John A. Stankovic University of Virginia
David E. Culler
David E. Culler University of California, Berkeley
Luca Mottola
Luca Mottola Polytechnic University of Milan
Jie Liu
Jie Liu Harbin Institute of Technology
Rajesh Gupta
Rajesh Gupta University of California, San Diego
Feng Zhao
Feng Zhao Microsoft (United States)
Gang Zhou
Gang Zhou William & Mary
Yuvraj Agarwal
Yuvraj Agarwal Carnegie Mellon University
Sang H. Son
Sang H. Son University of Virginia
Jonathan W. Hui
Jonathan W. Hui Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering alternative pathways within Computer Science, accredited online degree programs offer flexibility and broad access to quality education. Ensuring your institution is one of the top online degree programs accredited is crucial for future job prospects and further study.

Emerging fields such as game development and cybersecurity are especially popular online. If you're interested in digital entertainment, a game design masters online can help you turn your passion into a professional career. On the other hand, cybersecurity is a rapidly growing sector; earning an online master's degree cyber security provides advanced skills to protect digital assets and combat cyber threats.

Additionally, Computer Science opens doors to related disciplines like project management and infrastructure. A construction management masters degree online is an excellent way to branch out, combining technical knowledge with real-world leadership opportunities.

These options demonstrate how diverse online education can be. Choosing an accredited, reputable program helps ensure long-term career success in a rapidly changing tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Kamin Whitehouse

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles