World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Electronics and Electrical Engineering 40 4390 4211 1559 1456 176 11883
Computer Science 40 9069 8811 3852 3696 183 11914

Jonathan W. Hui publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan W. Hui between 2003 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan W. Hui published across 19 years, from 2003 to 2021, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2014. 2 of the 201 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2014. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 34 publications 2012: 34 publications 2013: 38 publications 2014: 44 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 2 publications
2003 2021

201 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan W. Hui: publications per year, 2003 to 2021
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 5
2005 4
2006 6
2007 3
2008 6
2009 2
2010 8
2011 34
2012 34
2013 38
2014 44
2015 8
2016 2
2017 2
2018 1
2019 1
2020 0
2021 2
Total 201
Download as CSV

Jonathan W. Hui publication distribution in Electronics and Electrical Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Electronics and Electrical Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan W. Hui sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 34–53 to 1,065+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 445. Most scientists, 445, have 174–193 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,065 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 174–193 publications, is where this scientist sits. 34–53 publications: 24 scientists 54–73 publications: 52 scientists 74–93 publications: 114 scientists 94–113 publications: 203 scientists 114–133 publications: 269 scientists 134–153 publications: 355 scientists 154–173 publications: 403 scientists 174–193 publications: 445 scientists 194–213 publications: 430 scientists 214–233 publications: 431 scientists 234–253 publications: 399 scientists 254–273 publications: 366 scientists 274–293 publications: 335 scientists 294–313 publications: 300 scientists 314–333 publications: 276 scientists 334–353 publications: 250 scientists 354–373 publications: 214 scientists 374–393 publications: 187 scientists 394–413 publications: 152 scientists 414–433 publications: 169 scientists 434–453 publications: 147 scientists 454–473 publications: 111 scientists 474–493 publications: 117 scientists 494–513 publications: 103 scientists 514–533 publications: 99 scientists 534–553 publications: 92 scientists 554–573 publications: 75 scientists 574–593 publications: 58 scientists 594–613 publications: 69 scientists 614–633 publications: 50 scientists 634–653 publications: 62 scientists 654–673 publications: 54 scientists 674–693 publications: 44 scientists 694–713 publications: 37 scientists 714–733 publications: 28 scientists 734–753 publications: 26 scientists 754–773 publications: 26 scientists 774–793 publications: 19 scientists 794–813 publications: 23 scientists 814–833 publications: 20 scientists 834–853 publications: 16 scientists 854–873 publications: 20 scientists 874–893 publications: 11 scientists 894–913 publications: 11 scientists 914–933 publications: 16 scientists 934–953 publications: 13 scientists 954–973 publications: 10 scientists 974–993 publications: 11 scientists 994–1,013 publications: 9 scientists 1,014–1,033 publications: 9 scientists 1,034–1,053 publications: 10 scientists 1,054–1,064 publications: 6 scientists 1,065+ publications: 99 scientists
34–53 publications 1,065+

This scientist: 176 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,065 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Electronics and Electrical Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,875 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
34–53 24
54–73 52
74–93 114
94–113 203
114–133 269
134–153 355
154–173 403
174–193 445 176
194–213 430
214–233 431
234–253 399
254–273 366
274–293 335
294–313 300
314–333 276
334–353 250
354–373 214
374–393 187
394–413 152
414–433 169
434–453 147
454–473 111
474–493 117
494–513 103
514–533 99
534–553 92
554–573 75
574–593 58
594–613 69
614–633 50
634–653 62
654–673 54
674–693 44
694–713 37
714–733 28
734–753 26
754–773 26
774–793 19
794–813 23
814–833 20
834–853 16
854–873 20
874–893 11
894–913 11
914–933 16
934–953 13
954–973 10
974–993 11
994–1,013 9
1,014–1,033 9
1,034–1,053 10
1,054–1,064 6
1,065+ 99
Download as CSV

Jonathan W. Hui D-index placement in Electronics and Electrical Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Electronics and Electrical Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan W. Hui sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 111+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 263. Most scientists, 263, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 111 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 178 scientists 31 D-Index: 257 scientists 32 D-Index: 263 scientists 33 D-Index: 262 scientists 34 D-Index: 244 scientists 35 D-Index: 236 scientists 36 D-Index: 211 scientists 37 D-Index: 220 scientists 38 D-Index: 214 scientists 39 D-Index: 214 scientists 40 D-Index: 205 scientists 41 D-Index: 187 scientists 42 D-Index: 194 scientists 43 D-Index: 201 scientists 44 D-Index: 155 scientists 45 D-Index: 189 scientists 46 D-Index: 148 scientists 47 D-Index: 160 scientists 48 D-Index: 134 scientists 49 D-Index: 130 scientists 50 D-Index: 141 scientists 51 D-Index: 156 scientists 52 D-Index: 108 scientists 53 D-Index: 130 scientists 54 D-Index: 112 scientists 55 D-Index: 97 scientists 56 D-Index: 111 scientists 57 D-Index: 102 scientists 58 D-Index: 108 scientists 59 D-Index: 120 scientists 60 D-Index: 103 scientists 61 D-Index: 93 scientists 62 D-Index: 92 scientists 63 D-Index: 74 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 73 scientists 66 D-Index: 64 scientists 67 D-Index: 69 scientists 68 D-Index: 60 scientists 69 D-Index: 39 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 59 scientists 72 D-Index: 46 scientists 73 D-Index: 49 scientists 74 D-Index: 38 scientists 75 D-Index: 35 scientists 76 D-Index: 32 scientists 77 D-Index: 35 scientists 78 D-Index: 31 scientists 79 D-Index: 22 scientists 80 D-Index: 34 scientists 81 D-Index: 31 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 23 scientists 84 D-Index: 18 scientists 85 D-Index: 30 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 20 scientists 89 D-Index: 8 scientists 90 D-Index: 17 scientists 91 D-Index: 7 scientists 92 D-Index: 14 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 10 scientists 98 D-Index: 10 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 16 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 8 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 13 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 5 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 8 scientists 111+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 111+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 111 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Electronics and Electrical Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,875 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 178
31 257
32 263
33 262
34 244
35 236
36 211
37 220
38 214
39 214
40 205 40
41 187
42 194
43 201
44 155
45 189
46 148
47 160
48 134
49 130
50 141
51 156
52 108
53 130
54 112
55 97
56 111
57 102
58 108
59 120
60 103
61 93
62 92
63 74
64 77
65 73
66 64
67 69
68 60
69 39
70 57
71 59
72 46
73 49
74 38
75 35
76 32
77 35
78 31
79 22
80 34
81 31
82 34
83 23
84 18
85 30
86 19
87 19
88 20
89 8
90 17
91 7
92 14
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 12
97 10
98 10
99 12
100 16
101 5
102 7
103 7
104 8
105 9
106 13
107 4
108 5
109 10
110 8
111+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonathan W. Hui is affiliated with Google in the United States. Their research career is situated within a leading technology company known for its emphasis on innovation and development in computer science and related disciplines.

There is no available detailed data on recent papers, co-authors, or specific publication venues linked to Jonathan W. Hui. Consequently, no comprehensive list of publications or collaborative relationships can be provided at this time.

No information is provided regarding book publications or awards received by Jonathan W. Hui, which leaves those aspects of their academic or professional profile unspecified.

Details about the main fields of study, subfields, and main research topics associated with Jonathan W. Hui are not included in the available data. This limits the ability to describe the precise scientific or technical domains they focus on within their work at Google.

The profile presents Jonathan W. Hui as an active researcher or professional associated with a major technology organization, but without further publicly available research outputs or documented scientific contributions from the source data.

Best Publications

  • The dynamic behavior of a data dissemination protocol for network programming at scale

    Jonathan W. Hui;David Culler

  • Energy-efficient surveillance system using wireless sensor networks

    Tian He;Sudha Krishnamurthy;John A. Stankovic;Tarek Abdelzaher

  • Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-Based Networks

    Pascal Thubert;Jonathan W. Hui

  • VigilNet: An integrated sensor network system for energy-efficient surveillance

    Tian He;Sudha Krishnamurthy;Liqian Luo;Ting Yan

  • IP is dead, long live IP for wireless sensor networks

    Jonathan W. Hui;David E. Culler

  • Trio: enabling sustainable and scalable outdoor wireless sensor network deployments

    Prabal Dutta;Jonathan Hui;Jaein Jeong;Sukun Kim

  • A unifying link abstraction for wireless sensor networks

    Joseph Polastre;Jonathan Hui;Philip Levis;Jerry Zhao

  • Extending IP to Low-Power, Wireless Personal Area Networks

    J.W. Hui;D.E. Culler

  • Connecting low-power and lossy networks to the internet

    Jeonggil Ko;A Terzis;S Dawson-Haggerty;D E Culler

  • Securing the deluge Network programming system

    Prabal K. Dutta;Jonathan W. Hui;David C. Chu;David E. Culler

  • Dynamiic division of routing domains in reactive routing networks

    Jean-Philippe Vasseur;Jonathan W. Hui

  • Marionette: using RPC for interactive development and debugging of wireless embedded networks

    Kamin Whitehouse;Gilman Tolle;Jay Taneja;Cory Sharp

  • Source routing convergence in constrained computer networks

    Jean-Philippe Vasseur;Jonathan W. Hui

  • Reduced topology routing in shared media communication networks

    Jean-Philippe Vasseur;Jonathan W. Hui

  • Dynamic Source Route Computation to Avoid Self-Interference

    Jonathan W. Hui;Jean-Philippe Vasseur;Wei Hong

  • Dynamic keepalive parameters for reverse path validation in computer networks

    Jean-Philippe Vasseur;Jonathan W. Hui

  • Routing using cached source routes from message headers

    Jonathan W. Hui;Jean-Philippe Vasseur;Pascal Thubert;Patrick Wetterwald

  • Methods and apparatuses for routing over multiple input multiple output power line communication networks

    Jonathan W. Hui;Jean-Philippe Vasseur;Wei Hong

  • Diverse paths using a single source route in computer networks

    Jonathan W. Hui;Jean-Philippe Vasseur

  • System and method for managing a list of entries containing routing information

    Jonathan W. Hui;Alec Woo;David E. Culler

  • An Energy-Efficient Surveillance System Using Wireless Sensor Networks

    Tian He;Sudha Krishnamurthy;John A. Stankovic;Tarek F. Abdelzaher

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Philippe Vasseur
Jean-Philippe Vasseur Cisco Systems (United States)
David E. Culler
David E. Culler University of California, Berkeley
Pascal Thubert
Pascal Thubert Cisco Systems (United States)
Prabal Dutta
Prabal Dutta University of California, Berkeley
Bruce H. Krogh
Bruce H. Krogh Carnegie Mellon University
Tian He
Tian He University of Minnesota
Patrick Wetterwald
Patrick Wetterwald Cisco Systems (United States)
Tarek Abdelzaher
Tarek Abdelzaher University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Philip Levis
Philip Levis Stanford University
John A. Stankovic
John A. Stankovic University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Electronics and Electrical Engineering offers diverse career opportunities, but many students and professionals seek flexible learning options to balance work and life commitments. For adults looking to fast-track their education, accelerated bachelors degree programs for adults provide an ideal solution. These programs enable faster completion without compromising quality.

For those interested in combining engineering expertise with instructional skills, exploring the best online master's for teaching can open pathways in technical education and training roles. This bridges the gap between engineering know-how and effective knowledge transfer.

Competency-based education is gaining traction in engineering fields. Institutions offering competency based universities focus on skills mastery rather than credit hours, making it easier for students to progress at their own pace—an especially beneficial option for working professionals.

Military spouses and dependents often face unique challenges when pursuing higher education. Many universities cater specifically to their needs, and you can explore tailored options among the colleges for military spouses to find flexible, supportive learning environments.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan W. Hui

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles