World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
77
Citations
40665
World Ranking
1102
National Ranking
481

Stephen V. Stehman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen V. Stehman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 193 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Stephen V. Stehman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen V. Stehman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen V. Stehman is affiliated with the SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry in the United States. Their research portfolio focuses primarily on environmental science, with a notable concentration in global and planetary change, ecology, and environmental engineering. Additional areas of expertise include atmospheric science and water science and technology.

Their work addresses a variety of topics centered on remote sensing applications and environmental dynamics. Key topics within their research include:

  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Fire Effects on Ecosystems
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

Stehman has published extensively in scientific journals, contributing significantly to the discourse on land cover change, inland water dynamics, and forest loss. Some of their recent notable papers include:

  • Conterminous United States land cover change patterns 2001-2016 from the 2016 National Land Cover Database (2020), published in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • Mapping and sampling to characterize global inland water dynamics from 1999 to 2018 with full Landsat time-series (2020), Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Massive soybean expansion in South America since 2000 and implications for conservation (2021), Nature Sustainability
  • Global Trends of Forest Loss Due to Fire From 2001 to 2019 (2022), Frontiers in Remote Sensing
  • The fate of tropical forest fragments (2020), Science Advances

The scientist often collaborates with other researchers in the field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Matthew C. Hansen
  • Peter Potapov
  • Alexandra Tyukavina
  • Amy Pickens
  • Xiao-Peng Song

Stehman's work is regularly published in peer-reviewed journals known for environmental and remote sensing research. These venues include:

  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Land
  • International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
  • ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • Science Advances

Best Publications

  • High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change

    M.C. Hansen;P.V. Potapov;R. Moore;M. Hancher

  • Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change

    Pontus Olofsson;Giles M. Foody;Martin Herold;Stephen V. Stehman

  • Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy

    Stephen V. Stehman

  • Global land change from 1982 to 2016.

    Xiao Peng Song;Matthew C. Hansen;Stephen V. Stehman;Peter V. Potapov

  • Making better use of accuracy data in land change studies: Estimating accuracy and area and quantifying uncertainty using stratified estimation

    Pontus Olofsson;Giles M. Foody;Stephen V. Stehman;Curtis E. Woodcock

  • Quantification of global gross forest cover loss

    Matthew C. Hansen;Stephen V. Stehman;Peter V. Potapov

  • Design and Analysis for Thematic Map Accuracy Assessment: Fundamental Principles

    Stephen V. Stehman;Raymond L. Czaplewski

  • Humid tropical forest clearing from 2000 to 2005 quantified by using multitemporal and multiresolution remotely sensed data

    Matthew C. Hansen;Stephen V. Stehman;Peter V. Potapov;Thomas R. Loveland

  • A meta-analysis of remote sensing research on supervised pixel-based land-cover image classification processes: General guidelines for practitioners and future research

    Reza Khatami;Giorgos Mountrakis;Stephen V. Stehman

  • Key issues in rigorous accuracy assessment of land cover products

    Stephen V. Stehman;Giles M. Foody

  • Mapping and sampling to characterize global inland water dynamics from 1999 to 2018 with full Landsat time-series

    Amy H. Pickens;Matthew C. Hansen;Matthew Hancher;Stephen V. Stehman

  • Sampling designs for accuracy assessment of land cover

    Stephen V. Stehman

  • Massive soybean expansion in South America since 2000 and implications for conservation.

    Xiao Peng Song;Xiao Peng Song;Matthew C. Hansen;Peter Potapov;Bernard Adusei

  • Accuracy assessment of NLCD 2006 land cover and impervious surface

    James D. Wickham;Stephen V. Stehman;Leila Gass;Jon Dewitz

  • Global Trends of Forest Loss Due to Fire From 2001 to 2019

    Unknown

  • Congo Basin forest loss dominated by increasing smallholder clearing.

    Alexandra Tyukavina;Matthew C. Hansen;Peter Potapov;Diana Parker

  • Estimating the Kappa Coefficient and its Variance under Stratified Random Sampling

    Stephen V. Stehman

  • Surface water extent dynamics from three decades of seasonally continuous Landsat time series at subcontinental scale in a semi-arid region

    Mirela G. Tulbure;Mark Broich;Stephen V. Stehman;Anil Kommareddy

  • Forest disturbance across the conterminous United States from 1985-2012: The emerging dominance of forest decline

    Warren B. Cohen;Zhiqiang Yang;Stephen V. Stehman;Todd A. Schroeder

  • Quantifying changes in the rates of forest clearing in Indonesia from 1990 to 2005 using remotely sensed data sets

    Matthew C Hansen;Stephen V Stehman;Peter V Potapov;Belinda Arunarwati

  • Thematic accuracy of the NLCD 2001 land cover for the conterminous United States

    J.D. Wickham;S.V. Stehman;J.A. Fry;J.H. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Potapov
Peter Potapov University of Maryland, College Park
Alexandra Tyukavina
Alexandra Tyukavina University of Maryland, College Park
James D. Wickham
James D. Wickham Environmental Protection Agency
Thomas R. Loveland
Thomas R. Loveland United States Geological Survey
Warren B. Cohen
Warren B. Cohen Oregon State University
Svetlana Turubanova
Svetlana Turubanova University of Maryland, College Park
Curtis E. Woodcock
Curtis E. Woodcock Boston University
Zhe Zhu
Zhe Zhu University of Connecticut
Zhiqiang Yang
Zhiqiang Yang United States Department of Agriculture
Sean P. Healey
Sean P. Healey US Forest Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths that often intersect with fields like geoscience, geographic information systems (GIS), public administration, and sociology. For those interested in the Earth's physical processes, exploring an online geoscience degree can provide a strong foundation in geology and environmental systems, essential for roles in resource management and environmental consulting.

GIS expertise is increasingly valuable in environmental sciences, helping professionals analyze spatial data for conservation and planning. Those eager to develop these skills can consider a gis degree online, which combines technology with environmental applications.

Leadership and policy-making roles benefit from an understanding of public administration. A best online mpa program can equip environmental professionals with management skills to influence sustainability policies and community initiatives.

Additionally, social dynamics play a critical role in environmental issues. Studying human behavior and societal development through an sociology bachelor degree online enriches one's ability to address environmental challenges that involve communities and human interactions.

Together, these related degrees provide a comprehensive skill set, enabling a holistic approach to environmental challenges and paving the way for varied and impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen V. Stehman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles