World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
96
Citations
43832
World Ranking
451
National Ranking
206

Warren B. Cohen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Warren B. Cohen sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 236 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Warren B. Cohen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Warren B. Cohen sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Warren B. Cohen is affiliated with Oregon State University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within Environmental Science, with a focus on subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Environmental Engineering, Forestry, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

Their work covers a range of topics related to ecosystems and environmental monitoring. Major topics include Fire effects on ecosystems, Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications, Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, African Botany and Ecology Studies, and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies.

Warren B. Cohen has contributed to several recent scientific papers, which highlight their involvement in remote sensing and ecosystem research. Notable publications include:

  • Aboveground biomass density models for NASA's Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar mission, 2022, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Three Decades of Land Cover Change in East Africa, 2021, Land
  • Diversity of Algorithm and Spectral Band Inputs Improves Landsat Monitoring of Forest Disturbance, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Using a trait-based approach to assess fire resistance in forest landscapes of the Inland Northwest, USA, 2022, Landscape Ecology
  • Corrigendum to continuous monitoring of land disturbance based on Landsat time series, Remote Sensing of Environment, 2020

The frequent co-authors that collaborate with Warren B. Cohen include:

  • Sean P. Healey
  • Hans-Erik Andersen
  • Zhiqiang Yang
  • Noel Gorelick
  • Zhe Zhu

Warren B. Cohen's research has been published predominantly in journals such as Remote Sensing of Environment, Land, Remote Sensing, Landscape Ecology, and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center for Biogeochemical Dynamics.

Best Publications

  • Landsat-8: Science and Product Vision for Terrestrial Global Change Research

    David P. Roy;M.A. Wulder;Thomas R. Loveland;C.E. Woodcock

  • Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies

    Michael A. Lefsky;Warren B. Cohen;Geoffrey G. Parker;David J. Harding

  • Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr — Temporal segmentation algorithms

    Robert E. Kennedy;Zhiqiang Yang;Warren B. Cohen

  • Opening the archive: How free data has enabled the science and monitoring promise of Landsat

    Michael A. Wulder;Jeffrey G. Masek;Warren B. Cohen;Thomas R. Loveland

  • Lidar Remote Sensing of the Canopy Structure and Biophysical Properties of Douglas-Fir Western Hemlock Forests

    M.A. Lefsky;W.B. Cohen;S.A. Acker;G.G. Parker

  • Landsat's Role in Ecological Applications of Remote Sensing

    Warren B. Cohen;Samuel N. Goward

  • Free access to Landsat imagery.

    Curtis E. Woodcock;Richard Allen;Martha Anderson;Alan Belward

  • Current status of Landsat program, science, and applications

    Michael A. Wulder;Thomas R. Loveland;David P. Roy;Christopher J. Crawford

  • Evaluation of MODIS NPP and GPP products across multiple biomes.

    David P. Turner;William D. Ritts;Warren B. Cohen;Stith T. Gower

  • Relationships between leaf area index and Landsat TM spectral vegetation indices across three temperate zone sites

    David P. Turner;Warren B. Cohen;Robert E. Kennedy;Karin S. Fassnacht

  • The global Landsat archive: Status, consolidation, and direction

    Michael A. Wulder;Joanne C. White;Thomas R. Loveland;Curtis E. Woodcock

  • Surface lidar remote sensing of basal area and biomass in deciduous forests of eastern Maryland, USA

    M. A. Lefsky;D. Harding;W. B. Cohen;Geoffrey G. Parker

  • Estimates of forest canopy height and aboveground biomass using ICESat

    Michael A. Lefsky;David J. Harding;Michael Keller;Michael Keller;Warren B. Cohen

  • Landsat continuity: Issues and opportunities for land cover monitoring

    Michael A. Wulder;Joanne C. White;Samuel N. Goward;Jeffrey G. Masek

  • Comparison of Tasseled Cap-based Landsat data structures for use in forest disturbance detection

    Sean P. Healey;Warren B. Cohen;Yang Zhiqiang;Olga N. Krankina

  • Lidar remote sensing of above‐ground biomass in three biomes

    Michael A. Lefsky;Warren B. Cohen;David J. Harding;Geoffrey G. Parker

  • Estimating structural attributes of Douglas-fir/western hemlock forest stands from Landsat and SPOT imagery

    Warren B. Cohen;Thomas A. Spies

  • Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 2. TimeSync — Tools for calibration and validation

    Warren B. Cohen;Zhiqiang Yang;Robert Kennedy

  • Quantification of live aboveground forest biomass dynamics with Landsat time-series and field inventory data: A comparison of empirical modeling approaches

    Scott L. Powell;Warren B. Cohen;Sean P. Healey;Robert E. Kennedy

  • An improved strategy for regression of biophysical variables and Landsat ETM+ data.

    Warren B. Cohen;Thomas K. Maiersperger;Stith T. Gower;David P. Turner

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert E. Kennedy
Robert E. Kennedy Oregon State University
Zhiqiang Yang
Zhiqiang Yang United States Department of Agriculture
Sean P. Healey
Sean P. Healey US Forest Service
Jeffrey G. Masek
Jeffrey G. Masek Goddard Space Flight Center
Chengquan Huang
Chengquan Huang University of Maryland, College Park
David P. Turner
David P. Turner Oregon State University
Michael A. Lefsky
Michael A. Lefsky Colorado State University
Dirk Pflugmacher
Dirk Pflugmacher Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Thomas A. Spies
Thomas A. Spies US Forest Service
Samuel N. Goward
Samuel N. Goward University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Environmental Sciences often find that complementary fields enhance their career prospects. For example, acquiring leadership skills through a one year MPA program can prepare graduates for management roles in environmental policy and public administration.

A strong understanding of societal dynamics is also crucial in addressing environmental challenges, making an online sociology bachelor degree online an attractive option. This degree equips students with insights into community behavior and social impacts of environmental decisions.

For professionals aiming to advance their expertise in education or training within environmental fields, pursuing online doctoral programs is beneficial. Programs like those highlighted in education doctoral programs without dissertation allow busy professionals to earn doctoral credentials on a flexible schedule.

Additionally, top institutions offering best EdS to EdD programs provide pathways for educators and environmental trainers to deepen their knowledge and impact through research and leadership development.

Best Scientists Citing Warren B. Cohen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles