World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
74
Citations
29363
World Ranking
1316
National Ranking
560

Jeffrey G. Masek publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey G. Masek sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 212 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jeffrey G. Masek D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey G. Masek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeffrey G. Masek is affiliated with the Goddard Space Flight Center in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on Environmental Science and Engineering, with contributions to Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, and Environmental Engineering as subfields of study.

Their recent publications emphasize the use of remote sensing technologies and their applications in environmental monitoring. Representative papers include:

  • Fifty years of Landsat science and impacts, 2022, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Landsat 9: Empowering open science and applications through continuity, 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Comparison of cloud detection algorithms for Sentinel-2 imagery, 2020, Science of Remote Sensing
  • Can we detect more ephemeral floods with higher density harmonized Landsat Sentinel 2 data compared to Landsat 8 alone?, 2022, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
  • Augmenting Landsat time series with Harmonized Landsat Sentinel-2 data products: Assessment of spectral correspondence, 2021, Science of Remote Sensing

Their work explores several main topics including:

  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping

Jeffrey G. Masek has frequently published in venues such as Remote Sensing of Environment, Science of Remote Sensing, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, and Climatic Change.

Their collaborative network includes coauthors who have contributed frequently to related research fields. Notable frequent coauthors are:

  • Junchang Ju
  • Zhe Zhu
  • Christopher J. Crawford
  • Curtis E. Woodcock
  • Michael A. Wulder

Jeffrey G. Masek's publications and collaborative efforts contribute to enhanced understanding and advancements in the application of remote sensing data for environmental monitoring, agriculture, and planetary change analysis.

Best Publications

  • Landsat-8: Science and Product Vision for Terrestrial Global Change Research

    David P. Roy;M.A. Wulder;Thomas R. Loveland;C.E. Woodcock

  • On the blending of the Landsat and MODIS surface reflectance: predicting daily Landsat surface reflectance

    Feng Gao;J. Masek;M. Schwaller;F. Hall

  • A Landsat surface reflectance dataset for North America, 1990-2000

    J.G. Masek;E.F. Vermote;N.E. Saleous;R. Wolfe

  • An enhanced spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model for complex heterogeneous regions

    Xiaolin Zhu;Jin Chen;Feng Gao;Xuehong Chen

  • Opening the archive: How free data has enabled the science and monitoring promise of Landsat

    Michael A. Wulder;Jeffrey G. Masek;Warren B. Cohen;Thomas R. Loveland

  • The Harmonized Landsat and Sentinel-2 surface reflectance data set

    Martin Claverie;Martin Claverie;Junchang Ju;Junchang Ju;Jeffrey G. Masek;Jennifer L. Dungan

  • Current status of Landsat program, science, and applications

    Michael A. Wulder;Thomas R. Loveland;David P. Roy;Christopher J. Crawford

  • An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense Landsat time series stacks

    Chengquan Huang;Samuel N. Goward;Jeffrey G. Masek;Nancy Thomas

  • The global Landsat archive: Status, consolidation, and direction

    Michael A. Wulder;Joanne C. White;Thomas R. Loveland;Curtis E. Woodcock

  • A new data fusion model for high spatial- and temporal-resolution mapping of forest disturbance based on Landsat and MODIS

    Thomas Hilker;Michael A. Wulder;Nicholas C. Coops;Julia Linke

  • Fifty years of Landsat science and impacts

    Unknown

  • Landsat continuity: Issues and opportunities for land cover monitoring

    Michael A. Wulder;Joanne C. White;Samuel N. Goward;Jeffrey G. Masek

  • Dynamics of urban growth in the Washington DC metropolitan area, 1973-1996, from Landsat observations

    J. G. Masek;F. E. Lindsay;S. N. Goward

  • North American forest disturbance mapped from a decadal Landsat record

    Jeffrey G. Masek;Chengquan Huang;Robert Wolfe;Warren Cohen

  • The vegetation greenness trend in Canada and US Alaska from 1984–2012 Landsat data

    Junchang Ju;Junchang Ju;Jeffrey G. Masek

  • Global Characterization and Monitoring of Forest Cover Using Landsat Data: Opportunities and Challenges

    John R. Townshend;Jeffrey G. Masek;ChengQuan Huang;Eric F. Vermote

  • Landsat 9: Empowering open science and applications through continuity

    Jeffrey G. Masek;Michael A. Wulder;Brian Markham;Joel McCorkel

  • Erosion and tectonics at the margins of continental plateaus

    Jeffrey G. Masek;Bryan L. Isacks;Timothy L. Gubbels;Eric J. Fielding

  • Use of a dark object concept and support vector machines to automate forest cover change analysis

    Chengquan Huang;Kuan Song;Sunghee Kim;John R.G. Townshend

  • Generation of dense time series synthetic Landsat data through data blending with MODIS using a spatial and temporal adaptive reflectance fusion model.

    Thomas Hilker;Michael A. Wulder;Nicholas C. Coops;Nicole Seitz

  • NASA Goddards LiDAR, Hyperspectral and Thermal (G-LiHT) Airborne Imager

    Bruce D. Cook;Lawrence A. Corp;Ross F. Nelson;Elizabeth M. Middleton

  • Forest disturbance across the conterminous United States from 1985-2012: The emerging dominance of forest decline

    Warren B. Cohen;Zhiqiang Yang;Stephen V. Stehman;Todd A. Schroeder

Frequent Co-Authors

Chengquan Huang
Chengquan Huang University of Maryland, College Park
Samuel N. Goward
Samuel N. Goward University of Maryland, College Park
Eric Vermote
Eric Vermote Goddard Space Flight Center
Warren B. Cohen
Warren B. Cohen Oregon State University
Jean-Claude Roger
Jean-Claude Roger University of Maryland, College Park
Sergii Skakun
Sergii Skakun University of Maryland, College Park
Michael A. Wulder
Michael A. Wulder Natural Resources Canada
Crystal B. Schaaf
Crystal B. Schaaf University of Massachusetts Boston
Robert E. Kennedy
Robert E. Kennedy Oregon State University
Sean P. Healey
Sean P. Healey US Forest Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career paths that match diverse interests and professional goals. For those seeking straightforward academic programs, exploring what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help identify degrees with flexible requirements that still lead to meaningful environmental careers.

If you are drawn to Earth’s physical processes, pursuing a geologist degree online offers specialized knowledge in geology and geosciences, crucial for roles in resource management and environmental consulting.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are in high demand within environmental fields. Enrolling in top gis degree programs equips students with advanced mapping and spatial analysis tools essential for environmental planning and conservation work.

For those interested in leadership and public administration roles related to environmental policy, a one year mpa program can provide intensive training in management, preparing graduates for impactful careers in government or nonprofit sectors focused on sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey G. Masek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles