World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
31
Citations
5300
World Ranking
1075
National Ranking
552

David R. Segal publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Segal sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 184 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

David R. Segal D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David R. Segal sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

David R. Segal is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park, United States. Their research focuses predominantly on Mathematics, with a notable emphasis on several subfields including Geometry and Topology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Algebra and Number Theory, Mathematical Physics, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The scientist's main topics of work encompass:

  • Finite Group Theory Research
  • Rings, Modules, and Algebras
  • Advanced Topology and Set Theory
  • Geometric and Algebraic Topology
  • Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
  • semigroups and automata theory
  • Financial Markets and Investment Strategies

David R. Segal has contributed to several recent papers published in various academic journals and repositories. Notable examples include:

  • "Defining $R$ and $G(R)$" (2022) published in the Journal of the European Mathematical Society
  • "Constructing uncountably many groups with the same profinite completion" (2021) in the New Zealand journal of mathematics
  • "Two Inconsistent Behavioral Biases" (2022) in The Journal of Investing
  • "Finite axiomatizability for profinite groups" (2021) in the Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society
  • "Defining $\mathbb{A}$ in $G(\mathbb{A})$" (2020) hosted on arXiv (Cornell University)

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers, with key co-authors including:

  • Joshua Livnat
  • Katrin Tent
  • Duo Pei
  • Nikolay Nikolov
  • André Nies

Publications by David R. Segal appear in several venues, with multiple contributions made to arXiv (Cornell University) and other journals such as SSRN Electronic Journal, Journal of the European Mathematical Society, New Zealand journal of mathematics, and The Journal of Investing.

Best Publications

  • America's Military Population

    David R. Segal;Mady Wechsler Segal

  • The demographics of military children and families.

    Molly Clever;David R. Segal

  • Recruiting for Uncle Sam: Citizenship and Military Manpower Policy

    David R. Segal

  • The postmodern military : armed forces after the Cold War

    Eliot A. Cohen;Charles C. Moskos;John Allen Williams;David R. Segal

  • The military and the transition to adulthood.

    Ryan Kelty;Meredith Kleykamp;David R. Segal

  • Propensity to Serve and Motivation to Enlist among American Combat Soldiers

    Todd Woodruff;Ryan Kelty;David R. Segal

  • Who Chooses Military Service? Correlates of Propensity and Enlistment in the U.S. Armed Forces

    Jerald G. Bachman;David R. Segal;Peter Freedman-Doan;Patrick M. O'Malley

  • Armed Forces after the Cold War

    Charles C. Moskos;John Allen Williams;David R. Segal

  • Change in Military Organization

    David R. Segal;Mady Wechsler Segal

  • Measuring The Institutional/Occupational Change Thesis:

    David R. Segal

  • Th1e Impact of Multiple Deployments on Soldiers' Peacekeeping Attitudes, Morale, and Retention

    Brian J. Reed;David R. Segal

  • Are Post-Cold War Militaries Postmodern?

    Bradford Booth;Meyer Kestnbaum;David R. Segal

  • On social organization and social control

    David R. Segal;Morris Janowitz;James Burk

  • Peacekeepers and Their Wives: American Participation in the Multinational Force and Observers

    Cynthia Riffe Hancock;David R. Segal;Mady Wechsler Segal

  • Examining the importance of organizational supports on family adjustment to army life in a period of increasing separation

    D. E. Rohall;M. W. Segal;D. R. Segal

  • Changing patterns of drug use among US military recruits before and after enlistment.

    J G Bachman;P Freedman-Doan;P M O'Malley;L D Johnston

  • Distinctive Military Attitudes among U.S. Enlistees, 1976-1997: Self-Selection versus Socialization:

    Jerald G. Bachman;Peter Freedman-Doan;David R. Segal;Patrick M. O'Malley

  • Propensity to Serve in the U.S. Military: Temporal Trends and Subgroup Differences

    David R. Segal;Jerald G. Bachman;Peter Freedman-Doan;Patrick M. O'Malley

  • Status Inconsistency and Ethnoreligious Group Membership as Determinants of Social Participation and Political Attitudes.

    Edward O. Laumann;David R. Segal

  • Towards a Postmodern Military: The United States as a Paradigm

    Charles C. Moskos;Charles Moskos;John Allen Williams;David R. Segal

  • Status Inconsistency, Cross Pressures, and American Political Behavior

    David R. Segal

  • The Iran-Iraq War: A Military Analysis

    David Segal

  • Observations from the Sinai: The Boredom Factor:

    Jesse J. Harris;David R. Segal

  • THE IMPACT OF MILITARY PRESENCE IN LOCAL LABOR MARKETS ON THE EMPLOYMENT OF WOMEN

    Bradford Booth;William W. Falk;David R. Segal;Mady Wechsler Segal

  • Division and Cohesion in Democracy: A Study of Norway.

    David R. Segal;Harry Eckstein

  • Implications for Military Families of Changes in the Armed Forces of the United States

    Mady Wechsler Segal;David R. Segal

  • Attitudes of Citizen-Soldiers Toward Military Missions in the Post-Cold War World:

    David R. Segal;Ronald B. Tiggle

Frequent Co-Authors

Jerald G. Bachman
Jerald G. Bachman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Patrick M. O'Malley
Patrick M. O'Malley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David Knoke
David Knoke University of Minnesota
Lloyd D. Johnston
Lloyd D. Johnston University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Morris Janowitz
Morris Janowitz University of Chicago
Eliot A. Cohen
Eliot A. Cohen Johns Hopkins University
James B. Jacobs
James B. Jacobs New York University
Edward O. Laumann
Edward O. Laumann University of Chicago
James N. Laditka
James N. Laditka University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Sarah B. Laditka
Sarah B. Laditka University of North Carolina at Charlotte

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science can open doors to a wide variety of interdisciplinary careers. For those drawn to government, policy analysis, or advocacy, a degrees for history offers a strong foundation in research, critical thinking, and context for political developments—skills highly valued in the public and nonprofit sectors.

Students interested in data analysis or political modeling may benefit from a math degree online. Mathematical expertise can enhance careers in polling, data science, and policy research.

Political Science graduates often pursue roles in research, information management, or public administration. Exploring online programs for library science is a smart step for those interested in archiving, government libraries, or document management.

If you are looking to link political science with environmental policy, understanding environmental science degree jobs salary can help you gauge prospects in environmental advocacy or policy analysis.

Best Scientists Citing David R. Segal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles