World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 33 8203 7608 2719 2404 98 5985

Bernard Coakley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bernard Coakley between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bernard Coakley published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2006. 5 of the 108 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2006. 1991: 4 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 7 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 6 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 1 publication
1991 2025

108 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bernard Coakley: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 4
1992 1
1993 2
1994 2
1995 1
1996 2
1997 0
1998 1
1999 3
2000 1
2001 4
2002 1
2003 4
2004 4
2005 4
2006 8
2007 8
2008 3
2009 4
2010 3
2011 1
2012 7
2013 2
2014 1
2015 6
2016 3
2017 5
2018 3
2019 4
2020 2
2021 1
2022 5
2023 3
2024 4
2025 1
Total 108
Download as CSV

Bernard Coakley publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard Coakley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 98 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404 98
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Bernard Coakley D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard Coakley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379 33
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bernard Coakley is affiliated with the University of Alaska Fairbanks in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within Earth and Planetary Sciences and Engineering, encompassing 22 and 15 publications respectively. The scientist's work focuses on several subfields including Ocean Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, Atmospheric Science, Geology, and Oceanography.

The primary topics of study for Bernard Coakley involve Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, Geological Studies and Exploration, Drilling and Well Engineering, Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics, Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods, Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, as well as Geology and Paleoclimatology Research.

In terms of scholarly output, Bernard Coakley has contributed to various publication venues. Notable among these are Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) at La Trobe University, Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans, Scientific Data, and the Journal of Geoscience Education. The volumes of their work include several papers published in these venues, indicating recurring contributions to both open research platforms and specialized journals.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Bernard Coakley are as follows:

  • The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean Version 4.0, 2020, Scientific Data
  • Using digital outcrops to make the high Arctic more accessible through the Svalbox database, 2020, Journal of Geoscience Education
  • The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean Version 5.0, 2024, Scientific Data
  • A Mesoscale Eddy With Submesoscale Spiral Bands Observed From Seismic Reflection Sections in the Northwind Basin, Arctic Ocean, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • Enhanced Mixing at the Edges of Mesoscale Eddies Observed From High-Resolution Seismic Data in the Western Arctic Ocean, 2023, Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans

Bernard Coakley has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Hans-Uhich Schmincke, P.P.E. Weaver, John V. Firth, J. Baraza, and James F. Bristow. Each of these collaborators is documented in association with ten joint publications, indicating ongoing collaborative research efforts.

Best Publications

  • The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO) Version 3.0

    Martin Jakobsson;Larry Mayer;Bernard Coakley;Julian A. Dowdeswell

  • New grid of Arctic bathymetry aids scientists and mapmakers

    Martin Jakobsson;Norman Cherkis;John Woodward;Ron Macnab

  • Simulation of Foreland Basin Stratigraphy using a diffusion model of mountain belt uplift and erosion: An example from the central Alps, Switzerland

    Hugh Sinclair;B. J. Coakley;P. A. Allen;A. B. Watts

  • New standards for reducing gravity data: The North American gravity database

    William J Hinze;Carlos Aiken;John Brozena;Bernard Coakley

  • A model for the headward erosion of submarine canyons induced by downslope-eroding sediment flows

    Lincoln F. Pratson;Bernard J. Coakley

  • The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean Version 4.0.

    Martin Jakobsson;Larry A. Mayer;Caroline Bringensparr;Carlos F. Castro

  • Ice shelves in the Pleistocene Arctic Ocean inferred from glaciogenic deep-sea bedforms

    Leonid Polyak;Margo H. Edwards;Bernard J. Coakley;Martin Jakobsson;Martin Jakobsson

  • The role of the sediment load in sequence stratigraphy: The influence of flexural isostasy and compaction

    David J. Reynolds;Michael S. Steckler;Bernard J. Coakley

  • Structure of the Dead Sea Pull-Apart Basin From Gravity Analyses

    U. S. Ten Brink;Z. Ben-Avraham;Robin E. Bell;M. Hassouneh

  • The Gakkel Ridge: Bathymetry, gravity anomalies, and crustal accretion at extremely slow spreading rates

    James R. Cochran;Gregory J. Kurras;Margo H. Edwards;Bernard J. Coakley;Bernard J. Coakley

  • Evidence of recent volcanic activity on the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel ridge.

    Margo Edwards;Gregory Kurras;Maya Tolstoy;Delwayne R. Bohnenstiehl

  • Modelling passive margin sequence stratigraphy

    M. S. Steckler;D. J. Reynolds;B. J. Coakley;B. A. Swift

  • The nature of the acoustic basement on Mendeleev and northwestern Alpha ridges, Arctic Ocean

    Vibeke Bruvoll;Yngve Kristoffersen;Bernard J. Coakley;John R. Hopper

  • Glacial geomorphology of the Central Arctic Ocean: the Chukchi Borderland and the Lomonosov Ridge

    Martin Jakobsson;Leonid Polyak;Margo Edwards;Johan Kleman

  • Gravity evidence of very thin crust at the Gakkel Ridge (Arctic Ocean)

    Bernard J Coakley;James R Cochran

  • Seabed erosion on the Lomonosov Ridge, central Arctic Ocean: A tale of deep draft icebergs in the Eurasia Basin and the influence of Atlantic water inflow on iceberg motion?

    Y. Kristoffersen;B. Coakley;Wilfried Jokat;M. Edwards

  • New Gravity Field for the Arctic

    Steve Kenyon;Rene Forsberg;Bernard Coakley

  • Morphology and structure of the Lomonosov Ridge, Arctic Ocean

    James R. Cochran;Margo H. Edwards;Bernard J. Coakley

  • Bathymetry from space: Rationale and requirements for a new, high-resolution altimetric mission

    David T. Sandwell;Walter H. F. Smith;Sarah T. Gille;Ellen Kappel

  • Bathymetry and deep-water exchange across the central Lomonosov Ridge at 88–89°N

    Göran Björk;Martin Jakobsson;Bert Rudels;James H. Swift

Frequent Co-Authors

Yngve Kristoffersen
Yngve Kristoffersen University of Bergen
Martin Jakobsson
Martin Jakobsson Stockholm University
Wilfried Jokat
Wilfried Jokat University of Bremen
John R. Hopper
John R. Hopper Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland
René Forsberg
René Forsberg Technical University of Denmark
Larry A. Mayer
Larry A. Mayer University of New Hampshire
Victoria Pease
Victoria Pease Stockholm University
James R. Cochran
James R. Cochran Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Leonid Polyak
Leonid Polyak The Ohio State University
Elizabeth Miller
Elizabeth Miller Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, but it is also worth exploring complementary online degrees that broaden your skill set. For instance, gaining language skills through a spanish degrees online program can enhance communication abilities, essential for international research and collaboration.

Veterans looking to transition into Earth Science or related fields can find tailored support in a spanish degree online for veterans, which offers flexibility and specialized resources to suit their unique circumstances.

For those interested in combining creative skills with scientific knowledge, earning an online mfa degree provides opportunities in environmental communication, visualization, and media.

Additionally, Earth Science graduates aiming to enter leadership or administrative roles can benefit from a human resource management masters degree online, which equips them with essential management and organizational skills.

Exploring these related degrees online adds flexibility and versatility to your career pathway in Earth Science, allowing you to adapt to a rapidly changing job market.

Best Scientists Citing Bernard Coakley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles