What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Oceanography
- Climate change
- Paleontology
Oceanography, Arctic, Antarctic sea ice, Ice sheet and Arctic ice pack are his primary areas of study.
His work in Sea ice, Bathymetry, Bathymetric chart, Last Glacial Maximum and Thermohaline circulation are all subfields of Oceanography research.
The Bathymetric chart study which covers Seafloor spreading that intersects with The arctic and Climatology.
His Arctic research incorporates themes from Glacial period, Paleontology and Cenozoic.
He combines subjects such as Cryosphere, Ice stream, Ice-sheet model, Glaciology and Deglaciation with his study of Ice sheet.
As a part of the same scientific family, Martin Jakobsson mostly works in the field of Arctic ice pack, focusing on Ice age and, on occasion, Shelf ice.
His most cited work include:
- Late quaternary ice sheet history of northern Eurasia (1086 citations)
- The International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO) Version 3.0 (710 citations)
- An improved bathymetric portrayal of the Arctic Ocean: Implications for ocean modeling and geological, geophysical and oceanographic analyses (414 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Martin Jakobsson spends much of his time researching Oceanography, Arctic, Paleontology, Bathymetry and Ice sheet.
Martin Jakobsson usually deals with Oceanography and limits it to topics linked to Glacial period and Sediment.
His studies deal with areas such as Continental shelf, Ridge, Pleistocene and Holocene as well as Arctic.
His research on Paleontology often connects related areas such as Ridge.
His Bathymetry study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Hydrography and Seafloor spreading.
His research integrates issues of Ice shelf, Ice stream, Ice-sheet model and Last Glacial Maximum in his study of Ice sheet.
He most often published in these fields:
- Oceanography (59.04%)
- Arctic (36.87%)
- Paleontology (17.59%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2016-2021)?
- Oceanography (59.04%)
- Arctic (36.87%)
- Holocene (9.40%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His scientific interests lie mostly in Oceanography, Arctic, Holocene, Ice sheet and Bathymetry.
His research in Oceanography intersects with topics in Glacier and Glacial period.
His study looks at the relationship between Arctic and fields such as Atmospheric sciences, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.
His work carried out in the field of Ice sheet brings together such families of science as Climate change and Ice shelf, Ice-sheet model.
His Ice shelf research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Iceberg and Sea level.
The various areas that Martin Jakobsson examines in his Bathymetry study include Seafloor spreading, Seabed and Sill.
Between 2016 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- BedMachine v3: Complete Bed Topography and Ocean Bathymetry Mapping of Greenland From Multibeam Echo Sounding Combined With Mass Conservation. (257 citations)
- Ryder Glacier in northwest Greenland is shielded from warm Atlantic water by a bathymetric sill (175 citations)
- The Nippon Foundation-GEBCO Seabed 2030 Project : The Quest to See the World's Oceans Completely Mapped by 2030 (105 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Oceanography
- Climate change
- Paleontology
His scientific interests lie mostly in Oceanography, Ice shelf, Arctic, Bathymetry and Ice sheet.
Many of his studies on Oceanography involve topics that are commonly interrelated, such as Glacier.
His studies in Arctic integrate themes in fields like Storm, Pycnocline, Holocene, Mixed layer and Evaporation.
His study in the fields of Bathymetric chart under the domain of Bathymetry overlaps with other disciplines such as Data collection.
His study in Arctic ice pack extends to Ice sheet with its themes.
His research in the fields of Antarctic sea ice overlaps with other disciplines such as Mass-independent fractionation.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
