World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 37 6196 5754 2964 2702 157 6944

James N. Laditka publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James N. Laditka between 1991 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James N. Laditka published across 34 years, from 1991 to 2024, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2009. 4 of the 160 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2009. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 3 publications
1991 2024

160 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James N. Laditka: publications per year, 1991 to 2024
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 2
2001 6
2002 2
2003 3
2004 7
2005 4
2006 10
2007 11
2008 16
2009 19
2010 8
2011 10
2012 6
2013 4
2014 4
2015 5
2016 4
2017 8
2018 8
2019 5
2020 5
2021 4
2022 3
2023 1
2024 3
Total 160
Download as CSV

James N. Laditka publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James N. Laditka sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 154–163 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 157 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411 157
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

James N. Laditka D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James N. Laditka sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272 37
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

James N. Laditka is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Charlotte in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on health professions, psychology, and social sciences, with a significant emphasis on clinical psychology and general health professions. Their work also covers specialized areas such as safety research, speech and hearing, and public health, environmental, and occupational health.

The main topics explored in their research include family and disability support, adolescent and pediatric healthcare, workplace health and well-being, employment and welfare studies, disability education and employment, suicide and self-harm studies, and occupational health and safety research.

Recent publications by Laditka showcase a broad spectrum of research interests. Notable papers include:

  • Mental health risks of parents of children with developmental disabilities: A nationally representative study in the United States, 2020, published in Disability and Health Journal
  • Severe developmental disability and the transition to adulthood, 2020, published in Disability and Health Journal
  • Psychological distress is more common in some occupations and increases with job tenure: a thirty-seven year panel study in the United States, 2023, published in BMC Psychology
  • Suicide mortality rates in farm-related occupations and the agriculture industry in the United States, 2021, published in American Journal of Industrial Medicine
  • Work-related asthma in the USA: nationally representative estimates with extended follow-up, 2020, published in Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Their frequent coauthors include Sarah B. Laditka, Jessica Hoyle, Ahmed A. Arif, Oluwaseun Adeyemi, and Jan Warren-Findlow. These collaborations have contributed to a range of studies, particularly in disability, mental health, and occupational health.

James N. Laditka has contributed to publications in several journals, with multiple papers appearing in the Disability and Health Journal and Innovation in Aging. Other venues include BMC Psychology, American Journal of Industrial Medicine, and Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

Best Publications

  • Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Adiposity as Mortality Predictors in Older Adults

    Xuemei Sui;Michael J. LaMonte;James N. Laditka;James W. Hardin

  • Access to health care and hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.

    Zahid Ansari;James N. Laditka;Sarah B. Laditka

  • Effect of Exercise on Cognitive Performance in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Review of Intervention Trials and Recommendations for Public Health Practice and Research

    Mark Snowden;Lesley Steinman;Kara Mochan;Francine Grodstein

  • Older adults' perceived physical activity enablers and barriers: a multicultural perspective.

    Anna E. Mathews;Sarah B. Laditka;James N. Laditka;Sara Wilcox

  • Health care access in rural areas Evidence that hospitalization for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions in the United States may increase with the level of rurality

    James N. Laditka;Sarah B. Laditka;Janice C. Probst

  • More may be better: evidence of a negative relationship between physician supply and hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.

    James N. Laditka;Sarah B. Laditka;Janice C. Probst

  • Attitudes About Aging Well Among a Diverse Group of Older Americans: Implications for Promoting Cognitive Health

    Sarah B. Laditka;Sara J. Corwin;James N. Laditka;Rui Liu

  • Hospital utilization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: health outcome disparities associated with race and ethnicity.

    James N Laditka;Sarah B Laditka;Melanie P Mastanduno

  • Prospective study of cardiorespiratory fitness and depressive symptoms in women and men

    Xuemei Sui;James N. Laditka;Timiothy S. Church;James W. Hardin

  • Adult Children Helping Older Parents Variations in Likelihood and Hours by Gender, Race, and Family Role

    James N. Laditka;Sarah B. Laditka

  • Race, Ethnicity and Hospitalization for Six Chronic Ambulatory Care Sensitive Conditions in the USA

    James N. Laditka;Sarah B. Laditka

  • Nonoccupational physical activity by degree of urbanization and U.S. geographic region.

    Jared P. Reis;Heather R. Bowles;Barbara E. Ainsworth;Katrina D. Dubose

  • Patient perceptions of service quality in group versus solo practice clinics

    Herng Ching Lin;Sudha Xirasagar;James N. Laditka

  • ATTITUDES ABOUT AGING AND GENDER AMONG YOUNG, MIDDLE AGE, AND OLDER COLLEGE-BASED STUDENTS

    Sarah B. Laditka;Mary Fischer;James N. Laditka;David R. Segal

  • Perceptions and Beliefs About the Role of Physical Activity and Nutrition on Brain Health in Older Adults

    Sara Wilcox;Joseph R. Sharkey;Anna E. Mathews;James N. Laditka

  • Association between community health center and rural health clinic presence and county-level hospitalization rates for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: an analysis across eight US states

    Janice C Probst;James N Laditka;Sarah B Laditka

  • Cardiorespiratory Fitness as a Predictor of Fatal and Nonfatal Stroke in Asymptomatic Women and Men

    Steven P. Hooker;Xuemei Sui;Natalie Colabianchi;John E. Vena

  • Providing Shelter to Nursing Home Evacuees in Disasters: Lessons From Hurricane Katrina

    Sarah B. Laditka;James N. Laditka;Sudha Xirasagar;Carol B. Cornman

  • Cardiorespiratory fitness as a predictor of dementia mortality in men and women.

    Rui Liu;Xuemei Sui;James N. Laditka;Timothy S. Church

  • Estimated Functional Capacity Predicts Mortality in Older Adults

    Xuemei Sui;James N. Laditka;James W. Hardin;Steven N. Blair

  • Physician supply, physician diversity, and outcomes of primary health care for older persons in the United States.

    James N Laditka

  • CARDIORESPIRATORY FITNESS AND ADIPOSITY AS MORTALITY PREDICTORS IN OLDER ADULTS

    X Sui;M J LaMonte;J Laditka

Frequent Co-Authors

Sarah B. Laditka
Sarah B. Laditka University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Daniela B. Friedman
Daniela B. Friedman University of South Carolina
Bei Wu
Bei Wu New York University
Sara Wilcox
Sara Wilcox University of South Carolina
Steven N. Blair
Steven N. Blair University of South Carolina
Xuemei Sui
Xuemei Sui University of South Carolina
Rebecca G. Logsdon
Rebecca G. Logsdon University of Washington
Joseph R. Sharkey
Joseph R. Sharkey Texas A&M University
Douglas A. Wolf
Douglas A. Wolf Syracuse University
Carol Jagger
Carol Jagger Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in Social Sciences and Humanities grows, flexible online degree programs are making advanced education more accessible. Many students now seek one year masters programs online to accelerate their career growth quickly—ideal for motivated learners wanting to upskill without long commitments.

For those aiming to complete their undergraduate studies faster, accelerated online degree programs offer the chance to earn a bachelor's degree in less time—often at a lower overall cost. This path is especially attractive for working adults or individuals eager to enter the workforce promptly.

Cost is a significant concern, especially in fields like social work. Fortunately, there are several cheap msw programs online that prepare students for meaningful roles while minimizing student debt.

Additionally, those interested in behavioral analysis can explore bcba masters programs, which provide specialized credentials for careers in therapy, advocacy, and support services.

These related online degrees create diverse career pathways, meeting the needs of learners with varying schedules, budgets, and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing James N. Laditka

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles