World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 57 3980 3669 2232 2010 132 16376

Rebecca G. Logsdon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rebecca G. Logsdon between 1989 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rebecca G. Logsdon published across 34 years, from 1989 to 2022, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2009. 3 of the 139 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2009. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 6 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 2 publications
1989 2022

139 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rebecca G. Logsdon: publications per year, 1989 to 2022
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 4
1993 1
1994 2
1995 4
1996 1
1997 6
1998 4
1999 7
2000 3
2001 2
2002 4
2003 2
2004 6
2005 4
2006 4
2007 8
2008 6
2009 9
2010 8
2011 8
2012 7
2013 7
2014 5
2015 7
2016 2
2017 6
2018 4
2019 2
2020 1
2021 1
2022 2
Total 139
Download as CSV

Rebecca G. Logsdon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca G. Logsdon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 132 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 132
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rebecca G. Logsdon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rebecca G. Logsdon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 57
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rebecca G. Logsdon is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and has contributed to research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including Human-Computer Interaction, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Rehabilitation, and Geriatrics and Gerontology.

The focus of Logsdon's research includes topics such as Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts, Aging and Gerontology Research, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Frailty in Older Adults, and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, and Quality of Life.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Logsdon encompass:

  • Using Virtual Reality to Improve the Quality of Life of Older Adults with Cognitive Impairments and their Family Members who Live at a Distance (2022, Health Communication)
  • Testing the Feasibility of Virtual Reality With Older Adults With Cognitive Impairments and Their Family Members Who Live at a Distance (2021, Innovation in Aging)
  • Public perceptions about risk and protective factors for cognitive health and impairment: a review of the literature (2020, UNC Libraries)
  • QUALITY OF LIFE IN ADULTS LIVING WITH COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT: DEVELOPMENT OF A UNIVERSAL MEASURE (2022, Innovation in Aging)

Logsdon has frequently collaborated with several researchers, among whom are:

  • Tamara D. Afifi
  • Nancy L. Collins
  • Kyle Rand
  • Christopher D. Otmar
  • Allison P. Mazur

Their publications have appeared in venues including:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • Health Communication
  • UNC Libraries

Best Publications

  • Assessing Quality of Life in Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment

    Rebecca G. Logsdon;Laura E. Gibbons;Susan M. McCurry;Linda Teri

  • Assessment of behavioral problems in dementia: the revised memory and behavior problems checklist.

    Linda Teri;Paula Truax;Rebecca Logsdon;Jay Uomoto

  • Quality of life in Alzheimer's disease: Patient and caregiver reports.

    Rebecca G. Logsdon;Laura E. Gibbons;Susan M. McCurry;Linda Teri

  • Exercise Plus Behavioral Management in Patients With Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Linda Teri;Laura E. Gibbons;Susan M. McCurry;Rebecca G. Logsdon

  • Behavioral Treatment of Depression in Dementia Patients: A Controlled Clinical Trial

    Linda Teri;Rebecca G. Logsdon;Jay Uomoto;Susan M. McCurry

  • Treatment of agitation in AD: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

    Linda Teri;R. G. Logsdon;E. Peskind;M. Raskind

  • Ambulatory physical activity performance in youth with cerebral palsy and youth who are developing typically.

    Kristie F Bjornson;Basia Belza;Deborah Kartin;Rebecca Logsdon

  • Nighttime insomnia treatment and education for Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, controlled trial.

    Susan M. McCurry;Laura E. Gibbons;Rebecca G. Logsdon;Michael V. Vitiello

  • Sleep disturbances in caregivers of persons with dementia: contributing factors and treatment implications.

    Susan M. McCurry;Rebecca G. Logsdon;Linda Teri;Michael V. Vitiello

  • Associations Between Physical Performance and Executive Function in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment: Gait Speed and the Timed “Up & Go” Test

    Ellen L. McGough;Valerie E. Kelly;Rebecca G. Logsdon;Susan M. McCurry

  • Older adults' perceived physical activity enablers and barriers: a multicultural perspective.

    Anna E. Mathews;Sarah B. Laditka;James N. Laditka;Sara Wilcox

  • Characteristics of sleep disturbance in community-dwelling Alzheimer's disease patients

    Susan M. McCurry;Rebecca G. Logsdon;Linda Teri;Laura E. Gibbons

  • Training Community Consultants to Help Family Members Improve Dementia Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Linda Teri;Susan M. McCurry;Rebecca Logsdon;Laura E. Gibbons

  • Anxiety in Alzheimer's Disease: Prevalence and Comorbidity

    Linda Teri;Louise E. Ferretti;Laura E. Gibbons;Rebecca G. Logsdon

  • Anxiety and Alzheimer's disease.

    Louise Ferretti;Susan M. McCurry;Rebecca Logsdon;Laura Gibbons

  • Increasing walking and bright light exposure to improve sleep in community-dwelling persons with Alzheimer's disease: results of a randomized, controlled trial.

    Susan M. McCurry;Kenneth C. Pike;Michael V. Vitiello;Rebecca G. Logsdon

  • Identifying Pleasant Activities for Alzheimer's Disease Patients: The Pleasant Events Schedule-AD

    Linda Teri;Rebecca G. Logsdon

  • The Pleasant Events Schedule-AD: Psychometric Properties and Relationship to Depression and Cognition in Alzheimer's Disease Patients

    Rebecca G. Logsdon;Linda Teri

  • Successful Behavioral Treatment for Reported Sleep Problems in Elderly Caregivers of Dementia Patients: A Controlled Study

    Susan M. McCurry;Rebecca G. Logsdon;Michael V. Vitiello;Linda Teri

  • Quality of life in patients with mild cognitive impairment

    Helena Bárrios;Sofia Narciso;Manuela Guerreiro;João Maroco

  • Evidence-based psychological treatments for disruptive behaviors in individuals with dementia.

    Rebecca G. Logsdon;Susan M. McCurry;Linda Teri

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda Teri
Linda Teri University of Washington
Michael V. Vitiello
Michael V. Vitiello University of Washington
Walter A. Kukull
Walter A. Kukull Washington University in St. Louis
Eric B. Larson
Eric B. Larson University of Washington
Sarah B. Laditka
Sarah B. Laditka University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Daniela B. Friedman
Daniela B. Friedman University of South Carolina
Joseph R. Sharkey
Joseph R. Sharkey Texas A&M University
James N. Laditka
James N. Laditka University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Myron F. Weiner
Myron F. Weiner The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Bei Wu
Bei Wu New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology can open doors to a wide range of related online degrees and career pathways, especially in the field of social work. Many students interested in psychology go on to pursue roles as licensed clinical social workers, counselors, or case managers, all of which typically require additional certification and specific educational backgrounds depending on the state.

For example, North Carolina education requirements for social workers highlight that a bachelor's degree in social work (BSW) is generally the minimum, while advanced positions may demand a master's in social work (MSW). The North Dakota education requirements for social workers also emphasize the importance of accredited degree programs and specific licensing exams.

Understanding social worker education requirements in Ohio and Oklahoma education requirements for social workers is crucial, as each state may differ in terms of coursework, supervised experience, and licensure steps. Prospective students should research state-specific requirements to align their education with their chosen career path in psychology or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Rebecca G. Logsdon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles