World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 132 2303 2145 1302 1194 568 71046

Eric B. Larson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eric B. Larson between 1976 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eric B. Larson published across 50 years, from 1976 to 2025, averaging 15.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2019. 28 of the 760 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1976 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2019. 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 6 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 10 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 8 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 10 publications 1987: 11 publications 1988: 11 publications 1989: 13 publications 1990: 19 publications 1991: 14 publications 1992: 18 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 16 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 15 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 21 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 26 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 32 publications 2021: 31 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 10 publications
1976 2025

760 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eric B. Larson: publications per year, 1976 to 2025
Year Publications
1976 1
1977 2
1978 6
1979 0
1980 6
1981 6
1982 10
1983 5
1984 8
1985 4
1986 10
1987 11
1988 11
1989 13
1990 19
1991 14
1992 18
1993 12
1994 16
1995 12
1996 15
1997 15
1998 12
1999 21
2000 4
2001 7
2002 11
2003 9
2004 20
2005 16
2006 9
2007 13
2008 20
2009 26
2010 17
2011 20
2012 23
2013 24
2014 23
2015 30
2016 23
2017 31
2018 23
2019 33
2020 32
2021 31
2022 19
2023 21
2024 18
2025 10
Total 760
Download as CSV

Eric B. Larson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric B. Larson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 568 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 568
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Eric B. Larson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric B. Larson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 132–133 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 132 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168 132
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Eric B. Larson is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with significant contributions spanning cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, molecular biology, physiology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to dementia and cognitive impairment research, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, functional brain connectivity studies, neural dynamics and brain function, atomic and subatomic physics research, health disparities and outcomes, and hearing loss and rehabilitation.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Eric B. Larson include:

  • Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2024 report of the Lancet standing Commission (2024, The Lancet)
  • Social participation and risk of developing dementia (2023, Nature Aging)
  • Genetic Architecture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the Million Veteran Program (2020, Circulation)
  • Analysis methods for measuring passive auditory fNIRS responses generated by a block-design paradigm (2021, Neurophotonics)
  • Effect of Personalized Risk-Reduction Strategies on Cognition and Dementia Risk Profile Among Older Adults (2023, JAMA Internal Medicine)

Frequent collaborators in their research include Paul K. Crane, C. Dirk Keene, Shubhabrata Mukherjee, Samu Taulu, and Caitlin S. Latimer.

Eric B. Larson has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

The scientist has been recognized by professional organizations, including membership in the National Academy of Medicine since 2007 and membership in the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer's disease

    Jean-Charles Lambert;Jean-Charles Lambert;Jean-Charles Lambert;Carla A Ibrahim-Verbaas;Denise Harold;Adam C Naj

  • Secreted amyloid beta-protein similar to that in the senile plaques of Alzheimer's disease is increased in vivo by the presenilin 1 and 2 and APP mutations linked to familial Alzheimer's disease.

    D. Scheuner;C. Eckman;C. Eckman;M. Jensen;X. Song

  • MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python

    Alexandre Gramfort;Martin Luessi;Eric Larson;Denis A. Engemann

  • MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data

    Alexandre Gramfort;Martin Luessi;Eric Larson;Denis A. Engemann

  • Exercise is associated with reduced risk for incident dementia among persons 65 years of age and older

    E. B. Larson;L. Wang;J. D. Bowen;W. C. McCormick

  • Gene-wide analysis detects two new susceptibility genes for Alzheimer's disease.

    Valentina Escott-Price;Céline Bellenguez;Li-San Wang;Seung-Hoan Choi

  • Clinical empathy as emotional labor in the patient-physician relationship.

    Eric B. Larson;Xin Yao

  • Exercise Plus Behavioral Management in Patients With Alzheimer Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Linda Teri;Laura E. Gibbons;Susan M. McCurry;Rebecca G. Logsdon

  • Cumulative use of strong anticholinergics and incident dementia: a prospective cohort study.

    Shelly L. Gray;Melissa L. Anderson;Sascha Dublin;Joseph T. Hanlon

  • Rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3, and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer's disease

    Rebecca Sims;Sven J. Van Der Lee;Adam C. Naj;Céline Bellenguez;Céline Bellenguez

  • The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI): A practical test for cross-cultural epidemiological studies of dementia.

    E L Teng;K Hasegawa;A Homma;Y Imai

  • Effectiveness of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring, Web Communication, and Pharmacist Care on Hypertension Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Beverly B. Green;Andrea J. Cook;James D. Ralston;James D. Ralston;Paul A. Fishman

  • Older adults' views of "successful aging" how do they compare with researchers' definitions?

    Elizabeth A. Phelan;Lynda A. Anderson;Andrea Z. Lacroix;Eric B. Larson

  • Survival after initial diagnosis of Alzheimer disease.

    Eric B. Larson;Marie Florence Shadlen;Li Wang;Wayne C. McCormick

  • Rising Use Of Diagnostic Medical Imaging In A Large Integrated Health System

    Rebecca Smith-Bindman;Diana L. Miglioretti;Eric B. Larson

  • Association of the Built Environment With Physical Activity and Obesity in Older Persons

    Ethan M. Berke;Thomas D. Koepsell;Anne Vernez Moudon;Richard E. Hoskins

  • Relationship of hearing impairment to dementia and cognitive dysfunction in older adults.

    Richard F. Uhlmann;Eric B. Larson;Thomas S. Rees;Thomas D. Koepsell

  • Hickman Catheter Infections in Patients With Malignancies

    Oliver W. Press;Paul G. Ramsey;Eric B. Larson;Alexander Fefer

  • Clinico-Neuropathological Correlation of Alzheimer's Disease in a Community-Based Case Series

    Alfredo Lim;Debby Tsuang;Walter Kukull;David Nochlin

  • Behavioral Disturbance in Dementia of the Alzheimer's Type

    Linda Teri;Eric B. Larson;Burton V. Reifler

Frequent Co-Authors

Walter A. Kukull
Walter A. Kukull Washington University in St. Louis
Paul K. Crane
Paul K. Crane University of Washington
Linda Teri
Linda Teri University of Washington
James D. Bowen
James D. Bowen University of Washington
Gerard D. Schellenberg
Gerard D. Schellenberg University of Pennsylvania
Thomas J. Montine
Thomas J. Montine Stanford University
James B. Leverenz
James B. Leverenz Cleveland Clinic
Elaine R. Peskind
Elaine R. Peskind University of Washington
David A. Bennett
David A. Bennett Rush University Medical Center
Philip L. De Jager
Philip L. De Jager Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn’t always mean becoming a doctor. There are various online degrees and career pathways related to the healthcare field that offer flexibility, affordability, and solid job prospects.

For those seeking entry-level positions, training as a medical coder is a popular choice. If you want to understand expenses and types of certification, you can find out how much does it cost to become a medical coder.

Nursing is another in-demand field with a range of online options. Prospective students often ask, how much is online nursing school? Affordable programs make it possible to complete your nursing education while balancing other commitments.

If you’re already a registered nurse and want to advance, many nurse practitioner programs are available online, leading to greater autonomy and higher salaries.

For those interested in academia or leadership, pursuing an online phd in nursing enables you to reach the highest levels of the profession and make a broader impact on healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Eric B. Larson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles