World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
110
Citations
55655
World Ranking
5469
National Ranking
2945

Daniel Porte publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Porte sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 296 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Daniel Porte D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Porte sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Porte is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields including Physiology, Surgery, and Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism.

The scientist's work concentrates on several main topics, notably:

  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Diet, Metabolism, and Disease

Recent publications by Daniel Porte illustrate engagement with research exploring glucose homeostasis and related physiological processes. One such publication is:

  • "Distinct Roles for Brain and Pancreas in Basal and Postprandial Glucose Homeostasis," published in 2023 by the journal Diabetes.

Collaborations are an important aspect of their research. Frequent co-authors include Kimberly M. Alonge and Michael W. Schwartz. These collaborations contribute to the multidisciplinary approach seen in their work.

The research outputs of Daniel Porte are published primarily in the journal Diabetes, which accounts for their recent documented publication record.

Best Publications

  • Central nervous system control of food intake

    Michael W. Schwartz;Stephen C. Woods;Daniel Porte;Randy J. Seeley

  • Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases in People With Diabetes Mellitus A scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association

    John B. Buse;Henry N. Ginsberg;George L. Bakris;Nathaniel G. Clark

  • Thiazolidinedione use, fluid retention, and congestive heart failure: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association.

    Richard W. Nesto;David Bell;Robert O. Bonow;Vivian Fonseca

  • Signals That Regulate Food Intake and Energy Homeostasis

    Stephen C. Woods;Randy J. Seeley;Daniel Porte;Michael W. Schwartz

  • Chronic intracerebroventricular infusion of insulin reduces food intake and body weight of baboons

    Stephen C. Woods;Stephen C. Woods;Elizabeth C. Lotter;Elizabeth C. Lotter;L. David McKay;L. David McKay;Daniel Porte;Daniel Porte

  • Cerebrospinal fluid leptin levels: relationship to plasma levels and to adiposity in humans.

    Michael W. Schwartz;Elaine R. Peskind;Elaine R. Peskind;Murray Raskind;Murray Raskind;Edward J Boyko;Edward J Boyko

  • Specificity of Leptin Action on Elevated Blood Glucose Levels and Hypothalamic Neuropeptide Y Gene Expression in ob/ob Mice

    Michael W. Schwartz;Denis G. Baskin;Thomas R. Bukowski;Joseph L. Kuijper

  • Diabetes, Obesity, and the Brain

    Michael W. Schwartz;Daniel Porte;Daniel Porte

  • Insulin in the brain: a hormonal regulator of energy balance.

    Michael W. Schwartz;Dianne P. Figlewicz;Denis G. Baskin;Stephen C. Woods

  • The Significance of Basal Insulin Levels in the Evaluation of the Insulin Response to Glucose in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Subjects

    John D. Bagdade;Edwin L. Bierman;Daniel Porte

  • Neural control of the endocrine pancreas.

    S C Woods;D Porte

  • Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma insulin levels in Alzheimer's disease: relationship to severity of dementia and apolipoprotein E genotype.

    Suzanne Craft;Elaine Peskind;Michael W. Schwartz;Gerard D. Schellenberg

  • The effect of epinephrine on immunoreactive insulin levels in man

    Daniel Porte;Alan L. Graber;Takeshi Kuzuya;Robert H. Williams

  • Evidence for a Common, Saturable, Triglyceride Removal Mechanism for Chylomicrons and Very Low Density Lipoproteins in Man

    John D. Brunzell;william R. Hazzard;Daniel Porte;Edwin L. Bierman

  • Relationships between fasting plasma glucose levels and insulin secretion during intravenous glucose tolerance tests.

    Brunzell Jd;Robertson Rp;Lerner Rl;Hazzard Wr

  • Evidence of Cosecretion of Islet Amyloid Polypeptide and Insulin by β-Cells

    Steven E Kahn;David A D'Alessio;Michael W Schwartz;Wilfred Y Fujimoto

  • Saturable transport of insulin from plasma into the central nervous system of dogs in vivo. A mechanism for regulated insulin delivery to the brain.

    G D Baura;D M Foster;D Porte;S E Kahn

  • Insulin and leptin: dual adiposity signals to the brain for the regulation of food intake and body weight.

    Denis G. Baskin;Dianne Figlewicz Lattemann;Randy J. Seeley;Stephen C. Woods

  • Insulin secretion in diabetes mellitus

    Michael A. Pfeifer;Jeffrey B. Halter;Daniel Porte

  • Localization of insulin receptor mRNA in rat brain by in situ hybridization

    Jonathan L. Marks;Daniel Porte;William L. Stahl;Denis G. Baskin

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen C. Woods
Stephen C. Woods University of Cincinnati
Jeffrey B. Halter
Jeffrey B. Halter University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Edwin L. Bierman
Edwin L. Bierman University of Washington
Michael W. Schwartz
Michael W. Schwartz University of Washington
Steven E. Kahn
Steven E. Kahn University of Washington
Denis G. Baskin
Denis G. Baskin University of Washington
John D. Brunzell
John D. Brunzell University of Washington
Daniel M. Dorsa
Daniel M. Dorsa Oregon Health & Science University
Randy J. Seeley
Randy J. Seeley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Scott M. Grundy
Scott M. Grundy The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA doesn’t have to start with a traditional MD program. If you’re considering alternatives, many accredited online degrees offer flexible, affordable ways to enter healthcare fields.

For registered nurses looking to boost their qualifications, some of the most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs provide a direct path to career advancement. Non-nurses interested in a fast track to advanced nursing roles can look into direct entry msn programs for non nurses online, which allow those with a bachelor’s degree in another field to earn a Master of Science in Nursing.

For students seeking less competitive options, there are direct entry nursing programs that have more accessible admissions requirements. Alternatively, if patient care isn’t your goal, a background in healthcare administration is valuable—explore whether can you get financial aid for medical billing and coding to determine your options in this growing field.

Whether your interest lies in clinical practice or healthcare administration, numerous online programs can help you start or advance your career in medicine and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Porte

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles