World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2873 2636 1654 1484 195 12691

Brent T. Mausbach publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brent T. Mausbach between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brent T. Mausbach published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 8.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2010. 9 of the 206 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2010. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications
2002 2025

206 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brent T. Mausbach: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 3
2004 3
2005 2
2006 9
2007 16
2008 16
2009 13
2010 22
2011 17
2012 17
2013 14
2014 12
2015 11
2016 6
2017 6
2018 5
2019 4
2020 2
2021 8
2022 5
2023 5
2024 5
2025 4
Total 206
Download as CSV

Brent T. Mausbach publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brent T. Mausbach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 195 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 195
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Brent T. Mausbach D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brent T. Mausbach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Brent T. Mausbach is a researcher affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their scholarly work primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a focus on Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. They also contribute to Sociology and Political Science as well as General Health Professions.

Mausbach's research broadly addresses topics such as Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Health Disparities and Outcomes, Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving, Sleep and Related Disorders, Family Caregiving in Mental Illness, Health, Psychology, and Well-being, and COVID-19 and Mental Health.

Recent published papers include:

  • Healthcare use and costs in adult cancer patients with anxiety and depression (2020, Depression and Anxiety)
  • Interventions to reduce loneliness in caregivers: An integrative review of the literature (2022, Psychiatry Research)
  • Caring for caregivers/care partners of persons with dementia (2021, International Psychogeriatrics)
  • Remotely Administered Resilience- and Wisdom-Focused Intervention to Reduce Perceived Stress and Loneliness: Pilot Controlled Clinical Trial in Older Adults (2022, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry)
  • Development of loneliness and social isolation after spousal loss: A systematic review of longitudinal studies on widowhood (2024, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society)

Frequent collaborators in Mausbach's publications include Andrés Losada-Baltar, Rosa Romero-Moreno, Javier Olazarán, Lucía Jiménez-Gonzalo, and Roland von Känel.

The researcher often publishes in several venues, notably:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • International Psychogeriatrics
  • Aging & Mental Health
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Prediction of Real-World Functional Disability in Chronic Mental Disorders: A Comparison of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

    Christopher R. Bowie;Colin Depp;John A. McGrath;Paula Wolyniec

  • Development of a brief scale of everyday functioning in persons with serious mental illness.

    Brent T. Mausbach;Phillip D. Harvey;Sherry R. Goldman;Dilip V. Jeste

  • The Relationship Between Homework Compliance and Therapy Outcomes: An Updated Meta-Analysis

    Brent T. Mausbach;Raeanne Moore;Raeanne Moore;Scott Roesch;Veronica Cardenas

  • Meta-analysis of the association between cognitive abilities and everyday functioning in bipolar disorder.

    Colin A Depp;Brent T Mausbach;Alexandrea L Harmell;Gauri N Savla

  • Combined cognitive remediation and functional skills training for schizophrenia: effects on cognition, functional competence, and real-world behavior.

    Christopher R. Bowie;Susan R. McGurk;Brent Mausbach;Thomas L. Patterson

  • Mobile interventions for severe mental illness: design and preliminary data from three approaches

    Colin A. Depp;Brent Mausbach;Eric Granholm;Veronica Cardenas

  • Well-being, appraisal, and coping in Latina and Caucasian female dementia caregivers: findings from the REACH study.

    David W. Coon;M. Rubert;N. Solano;B. Mausbach

  • Is Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Associated With Premature Senescence? A Review of the Literature

    James B. Lohr;Barton W. Palmer;Carolyn A. Eidt;Smitha Aailaboyina

  • Treatments for Patients With Dual Diagnosis: A Review

    Quyen Q. Tiet;Brent Mausbach

  • Depression and distress predict time to cardiovascular disease in dementia caregivers.

    Brent T. Mausbach;Thomas L. Patterson;Yaron G. Rabinowitz;Igor Grant

  • Effect of Alzheimer Caregiving Stress and Age on Frailty Markers Interleukin-6, C-Reactive Protein, and D-Dimer

    Roland von Känel;Joel E. Dimsdale;Paul J. Mills;Sonia Ancoli-Israel

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) versus acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for dementia family caregivers with significant depressive symptoms: Results of a randomized clinical trial.

    Andrés Losada;María Márquez-González;Rosa Romero-Moreno;Brent T. Mausbach

  • Augmenting psychoeducation with a mobile intervention for bipolar disorder: a randomized controlled trial.

    Colin A Depp;Colin A Depp;Jenni Ceglowski;Vicki C Wang;Faraz Yaghouti

  • Increased Framingham Coronary Heart Disease Risk Score in Dementia Caregivers Relative to Non-Caregiving Controls

    Roland von Känel;Brent T. Mausbach;Thomas L. Patterson;Joel E. Dimsdale

  • A comparison of psychosocial outcomes in elderly Alzheimer caregivers and noncaregivers.

    Brent T. Mausbach;Elizabeth A. Chattillion;Susan K. Roepke;Thomas L. Patterson

  • Ethnicity and time to institutionalization of dementia patients: a comparison of Latina and Caucasian female family caregivers.

    Brent T. Mausbach;David W. Coon;Colin Depp;Yaron G. Rabinowitz

  • A review of the psychobiology of dementia caregiving: a focus on resilience factors.

    Alexandrea L. Harmell;Elizabeth A. Chattillion;Susan K. Roepke;Brent T. Mausbach

  • Depression as a predictor of adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) in women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Brent T. Mausbach;Richard B. Schwab;Scott A. Irwin

  • A Review of Instruments for Measuring Functional Recovery in Those Diagnosed With Psychosis

    Brent T. Mausbach;Raeanne Moore;Christopher Bowie;Veronica Cardenas

  • Functional adaptation skills training (FAST): a randomized trial of a psychosocial intervention for middle-aged and older patients with chronic psychotic disorders.

    Thomas L. Patterson;Thomas L. Patterson;Brent T. Mausbach;Christine McKibbin;Christine McKibbin;Sherry Goldman;Sherry Goldman

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas L. Patterson
Thomas L. Patterson University of California, San Diego
Igor Grant
Igor Grant University of California, San Diego
Roland von Känel
Roland von Känel University of Zurich
Sonia Ancoli-Israel
Sonia Ancoli-Israel University of California, San Diego
Paul J. Mills
Paul J. Mills University of California, San Diego
Joel E. Dimsdale
Joel E. Dimsdale University of California, San Diego
Colin A. Depp
Colin A. Depp University of California, San Diego
Michael G. Ziegler
Michael G. Ziegler University of California, San Diego
Dilip V. Jeste
Dilip V. Jeste University of California, San Diego
Matthew A. Allison
Matthew A. Allison University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a degree in psychology, you can choose from a variety of online programs that lead to specialized careers in counseling and therapy. Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT) is one of the most in-demand psychology-related fields, offering rewarding career opportunities in both private practice and clinical settings.

To become a therapist, each state has its own educational paths and requirements. For example, if you want to learn how to become an mft in El Paso, you’ll need to complete a graduate psychology or counseling program and fulfill supervised clinical hours. There are specific mft requirements in Fort Wayne as well, which may differ in coursework and examination criteria.

Those interested in other regions can explore Fort Worth mft certification requirements for guidance about licensure and practice in Texas. Similarly, you might want to understand how to become an mft in Fremont if you hope to practice in California.

Exploring online psychology degrees can open doors to these fulfilling career paths while providing the flexibility to meet varied state requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Brent T. Mausbach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles