World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
7835
World Ranking
5317
National Ranking
1946

Richard M. Cruse publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Cruse sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 160 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Richard M. Cruse D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Cruse sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard M. Cruse is affiliated with Iowa State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with a substantial number of publications in these fields.

The main fields of study covered by their work include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences

The subfields of study represented in their research are:

  • Soil Science
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology
  • Earth-Surface Processes

The research topics most frequently addressed include:

  • Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Aeolian processes and effects
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Richard M. Cruse include:

  • Morphological characteristics and influencing factors of permanent gully and its contribution to regional soil loss based on a field investigation of 393 km² in Mollisols region of northeast China, 2022, CATENA
  • Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping in Highly Complex Terrain Using Machine Learning Models, 2021, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
  • Impacts of horizontal resolution and downscaling on the USLE LS factor for different terrains, 2020, International Soil and Water Conservation Research
  • Warming-dominated climate change impacts on soil organic carbon fractions and aggregate stability in Mollisols, 2023, Geoderma
  • Unpaved road erosion after heavy storms in mountain areas of northern China, 2021, International Soil and Water Conservation Research

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Richard M. Cruse are:

  • Brian Gelder
  • Chunmei Wang
  • Daryl Herzmann
  • Dennis C. Flanagan
  • Xingyi Zhang

Key venues where their work has appeared multiple times include:

  • Soil Erosion Research Under a Changing Climate, January 8-13, 2023, Aguadilla, Puerto Rico, USA
  • International Soil and Water Conservation Research
  • Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
  • Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
  • CATENA

Best Publications

  • Crop rotations for the 21st century

    D. L. Karlen;G. E. Varvel;Donald Bullock;R. M. Cruse

  • Sustainable Biofuels Redux

    G. Philip Robertson;Virginia H. Dale;Otto C. Doering;Steven P. Hamburg

  • The transcriptional landscape of αβ T cell differentiation

    Michael Mingueneau;Taras Kreslavsky;Daniel Gray;Daniel Gray;Tracy Heng

  • Impact of Biochar on Manure Carbon Stabilization and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

    Natalia Rogovska;David Laird;Richard Cruse;Pierce Fleming

  • Vegetative filter strip effects on sediment concentration in cropland runoff

    C. A. Robinson;M. Ghaffarzadeh;R. M. Cruse

  • Germination tests for assessing biochar quality.

    N. Rogovska;D. Laird;R. M. Cruse;S. Trabue

  • Corn Response to Seed-Row Residue Removal

    T. C. Kaspar;D. C. Erbach;R. M. Cruse

  • Soil erosion control practices in Northeast China: A mini-review

    Xiaobing Liu;Shaoliang Zhang;Shaoliang Zhang;Xingyi Zhang;Guangwei Ding

  • Effect of soil shear strength on soil detachment due to raindrop impact

    R. M. Cruse;W. E. Larson

  • Effects of conservation tillage on corn and soybean yield in the humid continental climate region of Northeast China

    Y. Chen;S. Liu;H. Li;X.F. Li

  • Tillage Effects on Soil Water Retention and Pore Size Distribution of Two Mollisols1

    Unknown

  • Cropping System and Nitrogen Effects on Mollisol Organic Carbon

    C. A. Robinson;R. M. Cruse;M. Ghaffarzadeh

  • The transcriptional landscape of αβ T cell differentiation

    Michael Mingueneau;Taras Kreslavsky;Daniel Gray;Tracy Heng

  • Soil: The Forgotten Piece of the Water, Food, Energy Nexus

    Jerry L. Hatfield;Thomas J. Sauer;Richard M. Cruse

  • Assessing alternative futures for agriculture in Iowa, U.S.A.

    M. V. Santelmann;David S. White;K. Freemark;Joan Iverson Nassauer

  • Sediment removal by prairie filter strips in row-cropped ephemeral watersheds.

    Matthew J. Helmers;Xiaobo Zhou;Heidi Asbjornsen;Randy Kolka

  • Grain yield response of corn, soybean, and oat grown in a strip intercropping system

    Mohammadreza Ghaffarzadeh;Fernando García Préchac;Richard M. Cruse

  • Nutrient removal by prairie filter strips in agricultural landscapes

    Xiaobo Zhou;Matthew J. Helmers;Heidi Asbjornsen;Randall K. Kolka

  • Impacts of fresh and aged biochars on plant available water and water use efficiency

    Deborah Aller;Samuel Rathke;David Laird;Richard Cruse

  • Daily estimates of rainfall, water runoff, and soil erosion in Iowa

    R. Cruse;D. Flanagan;J. Frankenberger;B. Gelder

  • Reservoir Sedimentation and Upstream Sediment Sources: Perspectives and Future Research Needs on Streambank and Gully Erosion

    G. A. Fox;A. Sheshukov;R. Cruse;R. L. Kolar

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew J. Helmers
Matthew J. Helmers Iowa State University
David A. Laird
David A. Laird Iowa State University
Xiaobing Liu
Xiaobing Liu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Stephen Polasky
Stephen Polasky University of Minnesota
Dennis C. Flanagan
Dennis C. Flanagan Agricultural Research Service
Daniel H. D. Gray
Daniel H. D. Gray Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Brent J. Danielson
Brent J. Danielson Iowa State University
Diane Mathis
Diane Mathis Harvard University
Humberto Blanco-Canqui
Humberto Blanco-Canqui University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Douglas L. Karlen
Douglas L. Karlen Iowa State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and skill sets. One valuable option is pursuing gis degree programs, which focus on spatial data analysis critical for environmental monitoring and management.

Public administration plays a significant role in environmental policy and regulation. Online programs like the best online mpa can equip students with leadership skills needed to influence environmental policy-making and implement sustainable initiatives.

Understanding human behavior and social dynamics is also vital in addressing environmental challenges. An online bachelors in sociology provides insight into the social factors impacting environmental conservation and community engagement.

For professionals looking to advance in academia or administration without extensive research demands, online edd no dissertation programs offer a flexible way to gain expertise applicable to educational leadership roles within environmental organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. Cruse

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles