World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
9912
World Ranking
6619
National Ranking
3594

Amy E. Pinkham publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy E. Pinkham sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 232 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Amy E. Pinkham D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy E. Pinkham sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Amy E. Pinkham is affiliated with The University of Texas at Dallas in the United States. Their scholarly contributions primarily span the fields of psychology and medicine, with significant attention to psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and philosophy. The focus of their research includes schizophrenia research and treatment, mental health research topics, mental health and psychiatry, bipolar disorder and treatment, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, functional brain connectivity studies, and psychosomatic disorders and their treatments.

Pinkham's recent publications include:

  • A Longitudinal Investigation of the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Mental Health of Individuals with Pre-existing Severe Mental Illnesses (2020, Psychiatry Research)
  • Autistic Symptoms and Social Cognition Predict Real-World Outcomes in Patients With Schizophrenia (2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry)
  • Self-reported Social Functioning and Social Cognition in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder: Using Ecological Momentary Assessment to Identify the Origin of Bias (2021, Schizophrenia Research)
  • Owner of a Lonely Mind? Social Cognitive Capacity Is Associated with Objective, but Not Perceived Social Isolation in Healthy Individuals (2021, Journal of Research in Personality)
  • Feasibility and Validity of Ecological Momentary Cognitive Testing Among Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment (2022, Frontiers in Digital Health)

Their collaborative work often involves a core group of frequent co-authors, notably Philip D. Harvey, Colin A. Depp, Raeanne C. Moore, David L. Penn, and Robert A. Ackerman.

Amy E. Pinkham has published extensively in various venues, with multiple works appearing in:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin

The research undertaken by Pinkham addresses several complex topics in mental health, focusing particularly on serious mental illnesses such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Their approach includes experimental studies in cognitive neuroscience and psychiatric research, addressing both symptomatology and treatment outcomes. This includes applying ecological momentary assessment strategies to better understand social cognition and functioning in psychiatric populations.

Best Publications

  • Implications for the Neural Basis of Social Cognition for the Study of Schizophrenia

    Amy E. Pinkham;David L. Penn;Diana O. Perkins;Jeffrey Lieberman

  • The Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation Study: Results of the Expert Survey and RAND Panel

    Amy E. Pinkham;David L. Penn;Michael F. Green;Benjamin Buck

  • Neural bases for impaired social cognition in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorders

    Amy E. Pinkham;Joseph B. Hopfinger;Kevin A. Pelphrey;Joseph Piven

  • Neurocognitive and social cognitive predictors of interpersonal skill in schizophrenia

    Amy E. Pinkham;David L. Penn

  • Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Initial Psychometric Study

    Amy E. Pinkham;David L. Penn;Michael F. Green;Philip D. Harvey

  • Social Cognition Psychometric Evaluation: Results of the Final Validation Study.

    Amy E Pinkham;Amy E Pinkham;Philip D Harvey;David L Penn;David L Penn

  • Emotion perception and social skill over the course of psychosis: a comparison of individuals "at-risk" for psychosis and individuals with early and chronic schizophrenia spectrum illness.

    Amy E. Pinkham;David L. Penn;Diana O. Perkins;Karen A. Graham

  • The face in the crowd effect: anger superiority when using real faces and multiple identities.

    Amy E. Pinkham;Mark Griffin;Robert Baron;Noah J. Sasson

  • Social cognition in schizophrenia.

    Amy E. Pinkham

  • Determinants of different aspects of everyday outcome in schizophrenia: The roles of negative symptoms, cognition, and functional capacity.

    Martin T. Strassnig;Tenko Raykov;Cedric O'Gorman;Christopher R. Bowie

  • Evaluating Posed and Evoked Facial Expressions of Emotion from Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

    Daniel J. Faso;Noah J. Sasson;Amy E. Pinkham;Amy E. Pinkham

  • Social cognition, social skill, and the broad autism phenotype:

    Noah J Sasson;Rachel B Nowlin;Amy E Pinkham

  • Social Cognition, Social Competence, Negative Symptoms and Social Outcomes: Inter-relationships in People With Schizophrenia

    Marc Kalin;Sara Kaplan;Felicia Gould;Amy E. Pinkham

  • The benefit of directly comparing autism and schizophrenia for revealing mechanisms of social cognitive impairment

    Noah J. Sasson;Amy E. Pinkham;Kimberly L. H. Carpenter;Aysenil Belger

  • CNTRICS Final Task Selection: Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience–Based Measures

    Cameron S. Carter;M Deanna;Ruben Gur;Raquel Gur

  • Actively paranoid patients with schizophrenia over attribute anger to neutral faces

    Amy E. Pinkham;Amy E. Pinkham;Colleen Brensinger;Christian Kohler;Raquel E. Gur

  • Cognitive empathy contributes to poor social functioning in schizophrenia: Evidence from a new self-report measure of cognitive and affective empathy

    Tania M. Michaels;William P. Horan;Emily J. Ginger;Zoran Martinovich

  • Resting quantitative cerebral blood flow in schizophrenia measured by pulsed arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI

    Amy Pinkham;James Loughead;Kosha Ruparel;Wen Chau Wu

  • Age-related increase of resting metabolic rate in the human brain

    Shin Lei Peng;Shin Lei Peng;Julie A. Dumas;Denise C. Park;Peiying Liu

  • Controlling for Response Biases Clarifies Sex and Age Differences in Facial Affect Recognition

    Noah J. Sasson;Amy E. Pinkham;Jan Richard;Paul Hughett

  • The Other-Race Effect in Face Processing Among African American and Caucasian Individuals With Schizophrenia

    Amy E. Pinkham;Noah J. Sasson;Monica E. Calkins;Jan Richard

  • A Longitudinal Investigation of the Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Mental Health of Individuals with Pre-existing Severe Mental Illnesses.

    Amy E. Pinkham;Robert A. Ackerman;Colin A. Depp;Philip D. Harvey

Frequent Co-Authors

David L. Penn
David L. Penn University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Philip D. Harvey
Philip D. Harvey University of Miami
Noah J. Sasson
Noah J. Sasson The University of Texas at Dallas
Colin A. Depp
Colin A. Depp University of California, San Diego
Ruben C. Gur
Ruben C. Gur University of Pennsylvania
Raquel E. Gur
Raquel E. Gur University of Pennsylvania
James Loughead
James Loughead University of Pennsylvania
Christian G. Kohler
Christian G. Kohler University of Pennsylvania
Kosha Ruparel
Kosha Ruparel University of Pennsylvania
Eric Granholm
Eric Granholm University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in Massachusetts and similar programs across the country can open up a wide array of career opportunities. Many universities now offer flexible online options, making it easier for students to balance studies with other commitments, regardless of location.

When considering your academic journey, it is important to review programs recognized for their quality and outcomes. For example, you can look into the best online psychology master's degree rankings in California or discover comparable options by exploring the best online psychology master's degree rankings in Florida. Each program may offer unique specializations in areas like counseling, clinical psychology, or school psychology.

Online graduate programs are not only academically rigorous but also designed to support diverse career pathways, from mental health services to human resources. In the Midwest, options such as online psychology master's programs in Kansas provide further choices for students seeking accredited virtual learning environments.

Best Scientists Citing Amy E. Pinkham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles